laughing dog said:
Unsurprisingly, you have no clue what I think about conservatives. Most of my family and in-laws are conservative. Some conservatives are thoughtful, considerate and generous people. Others are not. Some are villains, some are misguided, some are right about some matters and wrong about others (like most people of all ideological stripes).
I do have a clue what you tend to think of right-wingers, and a lot more than a clue, because I have your posts, in which you describe what you think about them. Okay, so you know that some conservatives are thoughtful, considerate and generous people. Great! But on the basis of your regular posting here, you still got the vast majority of them wrong (and yes, some are villains; some left-wingers are as well).
laughing dog said:
I am sorry you cannot parse simple English. Plainly stated, it means for you to adopt your own suggestion and wait a couple of years before posting again in this thread.
I can understand English reasonably well; as you should know, misunderstandings on this boards are ubiquitous, even among native English speakers, and your suggestion was not clear.
That said, my suggestion was not to stop posting now, but to come back in a couple of years regardless of when the ongoing discussion in this thread stops. But if I remember and I'm still posting on this website, I will come back and to see what happened with the predictions that teachers would stop teaching.
laughing dog said:
Of course it is idiotic. No one remotely familiar with the USA or its history knows it would be idiotic to teach US history without slavery.
Of course that it would be idiotic to do so. But what you called 'idiotic' was not "to teach US history without slavery". Rather, what you called an "idiotic strawman" is the point I was making. Which was not at all a strawman, or an idiotic reply. Remember that our exchange on the matter began when you replied to my reply to Jimmy Higgins. Look at his reply when I asked for an example of what teachers would stop teaching:
LOL. Mass homicide spike because of murder hornets. Makes as much sense as pinning it on George Floyd's murder. I’m trying to figure out if Trausti is saying that police departments refused to adequately do their jobs if they were going to be scrutinized for the occasional murder of unarmed...
iidb.org
Also, for further context, he was replying to a question I asked Loren Pechtel; later he replied that they would stop teaching whatever a nebulous "the right" doesn't want taught.
laughing dog said:
The issue is how to approach the issue of slavery. I will use two movies about the pre-Civil War South to provide a simple example. The first is Song_of_the_South which presents slavery as a relatively benign institution, and 12_Years_a_Slave_(film) which does not. Both are hypothetical examples of a presentation of slice of "history" of the slavery in the USA.
I did not watch "Song_of_the_South". I did watch "12 Years a Slave". But iirc, while based on a true story, that was fiction. I would expect that teachers would teach history, rather than movies. Still, let me ask you: are you claiming that teachers today teach history by showing children "12 Years a Slave" or similar movies, and that due to SB148, they'll stop doing so?