• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Democratic idiots

Status
Not open for further replies.
laughing dog said:
Your explanation reflects your idiosyncratic view of "concentration: and "left wing". Or to put it another way - does the race and gender influence your "judgment" as to who is left wing fringe or is there is an actual concentration of blacks and women in the "left wing fringe".
Click to expand...
Clearly the latter. Just look at the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. There are some white men there, but relatively few. The lopsidedness is even stronger when looking at the Squad. No white man is member of that "elite" unit.

Does your silence on the "right wing fringe" (except when called out about it) which is overwhelmingly white also reflect the demographic lopsideness of it?
Click to expand...
No, it reflects the fact that their dumbfuckery is more than adequately covered on this forum already.
Dumbfuckery by left-wing Democrats is not, hence this thread. And note that instead of acknowledging that SJL is a loon, you are still playing the race card.

Unfortunately for you, your posting history here does engender your "Trust me".
Click to expand...
I have criticized white men too. For example, I have criticized Biden a lot. I have criticized Bill de Blowjob when he was a very incompetent mayor of NYC - I like Eric Adams far better. I have criticized and ridiculed β when he was considered hot by the media. And many others.
And wtf is this "my girl" crapola?
Click to expand...
You seem very invested in defending her.

"My ilk" points out the racism and bigotry of the posts of your "ilk".
Click to expand...
There is no racism or bigotry in my posts. There is racism in playing the race card every time a black leftist is criticized.
 
RVonse said:
[Do you know any stupid white people practicing law?
Click to expand...
Yes. Louie Gohmert - former Texas congressman comes to mind. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley come to mind as well. Or How about Trump's lawyers who argued that as President he could legally have political assassinated.
 
Angry Floof said:
Kamala has not demeaned herself in any way and your blatantly misogynist degradation of a woman who obviously did NOT jack off her boyfriend in a theater like Boebert did with her "family values" is a spectacular display of HYPOCRISY.
Click to expand...
One gave a handy to her boyfriend. The other was a sugar baby to a powerful politician who appointed her to state boards.

There is a difference, but both are making fun of a politician's sexual history. If one is fair game, the other should be too.
 
GenesisNemesis said:
Everyone should be criticized. But oddly you only focus on black people. It's just a strange fixation.
Click to expand...
I do not only focus on black people. I have criticized and ridiculed white people too. But I get attacked with race card playing whenever I dare criticize or ridicule somebody black. No matter how much they deserve criticism and ridicule.

I have been focusing on the left, because idiocy on the right is more than well covered by others in other threads. And blacks are disproportionately represented among Democratic politicians, esp. on the far left. But that does not mean it's wrong to ridicule and criticize those politicians when appropriate.

Do you think SJL did not say something incredibly stupid? Do you think that she should not get ridiculed for it just because of her skin hue? What if the same thing had been said by Trump? How fast would it have been posted on this forum?
 
Derec said:
laughing dog said:
Your explanation reflects your idiosyncratic view of "concentration: and "left wing". Or to put it another way - does the race and gender influence your "judgment" as to who is left wing fringe or is there is an actual concentration of blacks and women in the "left wing fringe".
Click to expand...
Clearly the latter. Just look at the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. There are some white men there, but relatively few. The lopsidedness is even stronger when looking at the Squad. No white man is member of that "elite" unit.

Does your silence on the "right wing fringe" (except when called out about it) which is overwhelmingly white also reflect the demographic lopsideness of it?
Click to expand...
No, it reflects the fact that their dumbfuckery is more than adequately covered on this forum already.
Click to expand...
Ah, you feel the need for "whataboutism" in order to promote DEI.
Derec said:
Dumbfuckery by left-wing Democrats is not, hence this thread. And note that instead of acknowledging that SJL is a loon, you are still playing the race card.
Click to expand...
Bullshit.
Derec said:
Unfortunately for you, your posting history here does engender your "Trust me".
Click to expand...
I have criticized white men too. For example, I have criticized Biden a lot.
Click to expand...
And some of your best friends are black?
Derec said:
And wtf is this "my girl" crapola?
Click to expand...
You seem very invested in defending her.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension failure. I have not said a thing about what she has said.
Derec said:
"My ilk" points out the racism and bigotry of the posts of your "ilk".
Click to expand...
There is no racism or bigotry in my posts. There is racism in playing the race card every time a black leftist is criticized.
Click to expand...
It is the persistent choice of your targets that points to the bigotry and racism.
 
Derec said:
Angry Floof said:
Kamala has not demeaned herself in any way and your blatantly misogynist degradation of a woman who obviously did NOT jack off her boyfriend in a theater like Boebert did with her "family values" is a spectacular display of HYPOCRISY.
Click to expand...
One gave a handy to her boyfriend. The other was a sugar baby to a powerful politician who appointed her to state boards.

There is a difference, but both are making fun of a politician's sexual history. If one is fair game, the other should be too.
Click to expand...
Or the difference might be evidence. No matter how much conjecture you pull out of your ass, Lauren Boebert has proved herself publicly, on video, to be a hypocritical lowlife, as well as just not too bright. None of this applies to Kamala Harris.
 
Derec said:
Another thing. When we talk about people in Congress, dumbfuckery is strongly correlated with ultrasafe districts. SJL represents a D+23 district, MTG represents a R+22 one. It just happens that ultrasafe districts for Democrats are almost always in urban areas and often have black representatives, just like Republican ultrasafe districts tend to be in rural areas represented by whites.
Click to expand...
Never thought about that but you're right. The nuts are mostly in the extreme districts.
 
laughing dog said:
RVonse said:
[Do you know any stupid white people practicing law?
Click to expand...
Yes. Louie Gohmert - former Texas congressman comes to mind. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley come to mind as well. Or How about Trump's lawyers who argued that as President he could legally have political assassinated.
Click to expand...

Also Rudy Giuliani. Sydney Powell...Bill Barr....Brett Kavanaugh...Tom Cotton ... Lindsey Graham ...Rick Scott ... Mitch McConnell ... Mitt Romney ... Mike Johnson ... Matt Gaetz ... Roy Moore ... Jim Jordan ...

and more:
Dan Sullivan (R-AK)
Roger Wicker (R-MS)
Bill Hagerty (R-TN)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
Mike Rogers (R-AL)
Robert Aderholt (R-AL)
Mo Brooks (R-AL)
Andy Biggs (R-AZ)
Ken Buck (R-CO)
Doug Lamborn (R-CO)
Gus Bilirakis (R-FL)
Greg Steube (R-FL)
Darin LaHood (R-IL)
Andy Barr (R-KY)
Tom Emmer (R-MN)
Michelle Fischbach (R-MN)
Trent Kelly (R-MS)
Michael Guest (R-MS)
Jason Smith (R-MO
Mark Amodei (R-NV)
Lee Zeldin (R-NY)
Andrew Garbarino (R-NY)
Tom Reed (R-NY)
John Katko (R-NY)
Chris Jacobs (R-NY)
Dan Bishop (R-NC)
Kelly Armstrong (R-ND)
Steve Chabot (R-OH)
Bob Latta (R-OH)
Mike Turner (R-OH)
Dave Joyce (R-OH)
Cliff Bentz (R-OR)
Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA)
Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA)
Joe Wilson (R-SC)
William Timmons (R-SC)
Tom Rice (R-SC)
Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN)
John Rose (R-TN)
David Kustoff (R-TN)
Michael McCaul (R-TX)
Chip Roy (R-TX)
John Carter (R-TX)
Ben Cline (R-VA)
Morgan Griffith (R-VA)
Bryan Steil (R-WI)
Glenn Grothman (R-WI)
Liz Cheney (R-WY)
 
Derec said:
Toni said:
Keeping track of electrons is not such a big deal.
Click to expand...
That's the heart of the matter - the mechanisms. Mechanisms dictate what reactions happen under what circumstances. It's a lot easier to remember those things when you understand why and how they are happening.
Way back in the day, a lotta organic students about died having to memorize the nomenclature.
Click to expand...
Yes, there is memorization. Suffixes, prefixes, orders of precedence. But far less than many other fields.
(R)-2,3-dimethylbutanoic acid or whatever is not that hard compared to remembering Frankfuter v. McAndrews from 1987 or some other obscure case.
Practicing the law is about language and meaning and precedent. That’s not actually bullshit but being well spoken is helpful
Click to expand...
It is when trying to convince a jury of something you know is not true - like that OJ did not do it.
But I see you discount my opinion just because I am critical of the completely outdated jury system.
Click to expand...
Ohhhh, but I thought that you thought that knowing all of that case law was easy?

Maybe I misunderstood?

What I have learned is that what is relatively simple and straightforward to some people can be really hard for others.
 
Toni said:
Ohhhh, but I thought that you thought that knowing all of that case law was easy?
Maybe I misunderstood?
Click to expand...
Requiring a lot of memorization is not the same as intellectual rigor in my book.
Again, I do not think it is coincidence that among formally highly educated people lawyers tend to say the stupidest shit - like Moon being made of gases.
 
Don2 (Don1 Revised) said:
Also Rudy Giuliani. Sydney Powell...Bill Barr....Brett Kavanaugh...Tom Cotton ... Lindsey Graham ...Rick Scott ... Mitch McConnell ... Mitt Romney ... Mike Johnson ... Matt Gaetz ... Roy Moore ... Jim Jordan ...
Click to expand...
In their defense, none of them seem to believe that Moon is made of gas.
Also, it shows just how partisan you and others are - you are only able to acknowledge stupidity in Republicans.
 
Last edited:
Angry Floof said:
Or the difference might be evidence. No matter how much conjecture you pull out of your ass, Lauren Boebert has proved herself publicly, on video, to be a hypocritical lowlife, as well as just not too bright. None of this applies to Kamala Harris.
Click to expand...
I do not disagree that she is not too bright (but probably bright enough to know that Moon is rocky, not gaseous).
But if you say that sexual comments about Kamala Harris are not appropriate, then the same should hold for Lauren Boebert. And, for that matter, for Donald Trump as well.
 
laughing dog said:
Ah, you feel the need for "whataboutism" in order to promote DEI.
Click to expand...
It's not "whataboutism", nor DEI.
But the mentions of Republicans every time some stupid statement by a lefty Democrat is mentioned is whataboutism.
Reading comprehension failure. I have not said a thing about what she has said.
Click to expand...
You are defending her indirectly by deflecting and playing the race card.
That you have not said a thing about what she said is the problem. Not only for this discussion, but in general.
You usually do not engage with the topic at hand, but instead deflect.

It is the persistent choice of your targets that points to the bigotry and racism.
Click to expand...
Bogus accusations of racism and bigotry are a thought-terminating cliché and the last refuge of somebody who has run out of cogent arguments.
As you admitted, you have nothing to contribute about what SLJ actually said, so instead you focus on her skin color.

Politicians are fair game for criticism and ridicule no matter their party, their race or their gender.
 
Derec said:
Angry Floof said:
Or the difference might be evidence. No matter how much conjecture you pull out of your ass, Lauren Boebert has proved herself publicly, on video, to be a hypocritical lowlife, as well as just not too bright. None of this applies to Kamala Harris.
Click to expand...
I do not disagree that she is not too bright (but probably bright enough to know that Moon is rocky, not gaseous).
But if you say that sexual comments about Kamala Harris are not appropriate, then the same should hold for Lauren Boebert. And, for that matter, for Donald Trump as well.
Click to expand...
Were the comments about Lauren only about her being a woman? Or were they tied to her actual, known behavior?
 
Angry Floof said:
Were the comments about Lauren only about her being a woman? Or were they tied to her actual, known behavior?
Click to expand...
So was Heels Up Kamala. It was well known that she was in a sugar relationship with Willie Brown and that he put her on state boards in return.
 
GenesisNemesis said:
Derec said:
GenesisNemesis said:
Ah Derec is still ranting about black people I see?
Click to expand...
Should black people not be criticized? Is it only ok to say bad things about white people? That's quite racist on your part.
Click to expand...
Everyone should be criticized. But oddly you only focus on black people. It's just a strange fixation.
Click to expand...

Let's be fair. While he does seem to hate on black women especially, he also rants about Hispanic women and Muslim women.

He pretends not to be a Trumplicker, but faced with a choice between a half-black woman for V.P. who slept with a black Democrat and a voluptuous tall First Lady of European ancestry, there's little doubt which he'll choose. Credible rumors that Melania was working as a high-priced call-girl when she met Donald just add to her allure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom