Wiploc
Veteran Member
Back in post 106, you say the argument is valid, but now you're saying they left out a premise? Can both be true?
Yes, both can be true, because the test for the worth of an argument is not its validity, but its soundness. An argument can be valid even if its premises are bullshit and the argument is enthymemetic.
I'm confused. How can an argument be valid if it leaves out premises?