• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Merged Gaza just launched an unprovoked attack on Israel

To denote when two or more threads have been merged
Simple observation of current events and the last 50 years.

A key problem is Iran maintaining a policy of the destruction of Israel. They fund the militant sarnies,

Israelis not going away. Jordan and Israel made peace. Normalization was stating with Arabs before the war.

The only thing tat works in the region is force. Iran has to be deterred for lasting peace.
Most conflicts in the area you'll find Iran playing puppet master. Yet the world keeps blaming the Jews and turning a blind eye to Iran's actions. Look under the streetlight!!!
 
“Shithole.”

Meanwhile, urban centers, written law, astronomy, mathematics, trade networks, and libraries all originated in that same stretch of land. But sure, centuries of colonial borders, coups, and foreign interference have nothing to do with it. :rolleyes:

Oh and, while the “modern state” you’re praising (really just a synonym for Western-style civilization) was stumbling through its Dark Ages, it was Arab and Persian scholars who preserved and expanded the works of Greece and Rome. Surely something happened over time with these same people to get us here, and it can’t only be about them.

EDIT: And by “these same people,” I include the Jewish communities that were part of that same civilizational fabric. Their early laws, ethics, and scholarship shaped the region too.
They used to be the center of progress in the world. But now the area has become a shithole because Islam is being used as a tool for power. And the war in EastAsia (Israel) has been very useful for distracting the population.

Showing what something was doesn't mean it still is that! Things can get better, things can get worse.
 
Morals Dr Z?

What about the long running Israeli seizure of Palestinian land for Israeli settlers?

What about the founding of Israel itself by force taking land? That is where the conflict today began.

The brutality of Hams is an issue, in the news they are executing Palestinians. But it all began with Jews taking land owned by others.

West Bank Jewish settlers have forced Palestinians off their land at gunpoint.

All predicated by a 2000 year old claim to the land given by a god.
Excuse me,it all began with Jews BUYING land about 75 years before Israel was founded. Yes, the horror that Jews might buy land, and actually gain some sort of political control over land containing mosques built on old Jewish holy sites precipitated a moral panic that is still going on, and was the principle objection to Jewish immigration to pre-mandatory Palestine.

It didn’t start in 48 thats for sure, and no bull about everyone living in wonderful harmony until the bad Zionists came. Nope nope nope
Actually the Brits but the kibosh on Jews buying land as I understand it.

Regardless Israel was founded by seizing prime land they could not pay for.

I read a book on the run up to the founding. There were militant Jewish factions fighting each other. Both Jews and Arabs committed atrocious. Menachem Begin future leader of Israel was a terrorist bomber.

ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing

Please do not try ad tell me the Jews were innocents in all of it. It all happ0ened before I was born not for me to judge morally. What I do look at is what Israel did to Palestinians post formation of Israel.

As we speak Israel is expanding colonization of the West Bank displacing Palestinians. A slow decades long cultural genocide.

A little known story. An American Jewish officer post WWII was given the nod to go to Palestine. He is credited with restructuring the Jewish militants into an army. Killed by friendly fire.


David Daniel "Mickey" Marcus (February 22, 1901 – June 10, 1948) was a United States Army colonel, later Israel's first general, who was a principal architect of the U.S. military's World War II civil-affairs policies,[1][2] including the organization of the war-crimes trials in Germany and in Japan.[1]

He assisted Israel during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, one of the well-known Israeli Machal soldiers, becoming Israel's first modern general[2][3] (Hebrew: Aluf). He was killed by friendly fire. He was portrayed by Kirk Douglas in the 1966 Hollywood movie Cast a Giant Shadow, which focused on his role in the war.[4]

Look at the total tonnage of ordnance expended on Gaza, a very small area. Palestinians had no where to go, shooting fish in a barrel. If the bombing campaign was not genocide I do not know what is.
The destruction of Gaza has not destroyed Hamas, it destroyed the peool and their homkes.

Bomb a school, hospital, or home Israel says there were terrorists. It is not a militarily canpai8gn it is a terror campaign.

As the war p[regressed reporting from Israel showed the army was getting frustrated seieing no military goal. Some soldiers began refuting to fight.l


It all comes around to Netanyahu keeping his political power. He tried to eliminate judicial review of the legislature, backed off due to popular opposition. It would be like Trump getting rid of SCOTUS.
 
Islam happened.

The 19th–20th-century European imperial policies are what turned a historically advanced, interconnected region into the fragmented map you see today, and your grand historical takeaway is just “Islam happened.” Brilliant. Funny how no one mentions that what we now call “radical Islam” largely took shape after European colonization, coups, and proxy wars tore apart the same societies that once led the world in science and philosophy.

Colonize people, erase their history, sell them weapons, then act shocked when “Islam happens.” :ROFLMAO: I guess "Islam happens" is just a creative way of naming the harvest of an empire’s planting.
Islam has been a problem for a long, long time. It's just in the past the problem was mostly local and when everyone in an area is on the same side there is little trouble. The developing technology has turned local issues into global ones. But even before the colonial era: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_corsairs The reality is colonialism is rarely the main problem in an area, just an excuse to avoid addressing internal issues.
 
Simple observation of current events and the last 50 years.

A key problem is Iran maintaining a policy of the destruction of Israel. They fund the militant sarnies,

Israelis not going away. Jordan and Israel made peace. Normalization was stating with Arabs before the war.

The only thing tat works in the region is force. Iran has to be deterred for lasting peace.
Most conflicts in the area you'll find Iran playing puppet master. Yet the world keeps blaming the Jews and turning a blind eye to Iran's actions. Look under the streetlight!!!
Agree.

Trying to eliminate Hamas does not solve the problem. With Hussein gone Iran is the bad actor in the region.

Lebanon has been described as user militarily occupation funded by Iran.

Hamas gets a paycheck and the elite probably live pretty good. If they give up power they have to get day jobs.
 
Islam happened.

The 19th–20th-century European imperial policies are what turned a historically advanced, interconnected region into the fragmented map you see today, and your grand historical takeaway is just “Islam happened.” Brilliant. Funny how no one mentions that what we now call “radical Islam”

There is no such thing as “radical islam” it’s just islam.
No. I have been in some of the places that are now the trouble spots of the world--they weren't back then. Backwards, yes. Islam, but not radical Islam. A bit of respect for religious codes and you would have no trouble. (Same as you wouldn't walk into a church here in a bikini.)
 
The point is you pretend that "MSF" must be a good guy. We have one case where it is clearly shown they were a very bad guy.
You are never going to be able to produce a useful (or even rational) opinion on any moral issue while you insist on clinging to your insane insistence that "good guy" and "bad guy" are categories that are in some way sensible.

There are literally and exactly zero entities that can be included in either set; Your use of them indicates a degree of ignorance about the human condition that disqualifies you from even the possibility that you might have a useful opinion.

Fucking stop it, and grow up.

TV westerns of the 1960s are not the acme of moral philosophy. In real life, nobody wears a hat colour-coded to his moral worth.

There are not now, and have never been, "good guys". Only a simpleton (or a religious enthusiast, but I repeat myself) would even give credence to the possibility that there were.
 

Fair points on Iran’s influence, but this reads like a snapshot without the wider lens. Regional policy isn’t just theology or aggression, it’s survival my dude. Everybody in that hood is playing defense disguised as offense. Iran funds the Houthis to contain Saudi power, not overthrow it. Lebanon isn’t occupied, it’s fractured. And Iran’s anti-Israel stance is political theatre mixed with deterrence, not an invasion plan. The Middle East isn’t some avengers comic book where good guys fight the forces of evil bruh burh. It’s a chessboard where everyone’s a pawn and a player.
The Saudis were not harming Iran, Iran chose to fund a proxy war to hurt the Saudis.

If it wasn't Iran behind the messes over there why do you always find Iranian fingers in the pie? Why should we ignore the one consistent factor with all the Middle East and Africa trouble? (Pakistan/Afghanistan is separate.)
 
Back on topic, I’m honestly trying to understand how Hamas managed to secure the bodies of the hostages for nearly two years amid constant bombardment. Were they able to move them each time they relocated, or did they have a location that somehow stayed protected the whole time? Gaza’s so densely monitored it’s hard to picture how that could go undetected for so long. The reason I ask is because part of the deal involves returning all the hostages, dead or alive , and given Hamas’s history, it’s hard to see why they’d prioritize safeguarding remains. Maybe Israel already knew where the hostages were and chose to strike anything deemed militant in hopes of pressuring Hamas to release them.

Reports are saying Hamas still hasn’t turned over all the hostages, maybe they’re scrambling to find remains they left behind somewhere along the way.
I doubt they did more than simply keep track of where. And it appears that they didn't actually do a very good job of that.
 
Back on topic, I’m honestly trying to understand how Hamas managed to secure the bodies of the hostages for nearly two years amid constant bombardment. Were they able to move them each time they relocated, or did they have a location that somehow stayed protected the whole time? Gaza’s so densely monitored it’s hard to picture how that could go undetected for so long. The reason I ask is because part of the deal involves returning all the hostages, dead or alive , and given Hamas’s history, it’s hard to see why they’d prioritize safeguarding remains. Maybe Israel already knew where the hostages were and chose to strike anything deemed militant in hopes of pressuring Hamas to release them.
IIRC from that first big hostage release under Biden many of the hostages were kept in home of sympathetic Palestinian families and were actually treated quite well by those families.
Maybe some were, but haven't you been paying attention to the horrors that have been visited upon the hostages?

This whole thing was basically Biden 2.0, the same agreement.

135 hostages (if my math and source is correct) released under Biden. 20 released under Trump. Yet Trump gets all the credit.
I don't think either is actually very relevant.
There is speculation that when Trump and Netanyahu met before the election they agreed to not negotiate for more releases until Trump was elected to keep Biden from having another win.
I see no reason to think this. If it were about not helping Biden it would have happened months ago.
Reports are saying Hamas still hasn’t turned over all the hostages, maybe they’re scrambling to find remains they left behind somewhere along the way.
I haven't heard that but considering how many dead people are still under the rubble of those destroyed buildings it would not surprise me if hostages are not buried among them along with dead captors.
How many are under the rubble? You're taking Hamas' word for it on that. Somehow there are 10,000--and the count doesn't change. That makes no sense--as time goes on the death count of any mass calamity drops as duplicates are resolved. We saw the same thing with the twin towers--10,000 missing, but it actually turned out to be about 2,500. It's a Hamas fabrication, just like basically everything else they say. Most things were evacuated before the bombs fell, there's little reason to think there's any great number in the rubble.
 
I would like to note that it was diplomacy, not genocide, that saved these final survivors of the horror. In particular, American influence. Any American president could have chosen to do as Trump has done. Violence freed 8 hostages. 3 were murdered by their rescuers. 168 were rescued by conference. Let the lesson be clear.
Yet how much better if the hostages were never taken in the first place.
Let the lesson be clear.

All that killing and destruction for what purpose or aim? (aiming at both Hamas and Israel)
It's not Israel that chose 10/7.

And it's not really Hamas, either. The prime mover is Iran.
 
Palestinians do not have the ability for stable self rule.
That is one of the most vile statements of casual and thoughtless racism it has ever been my misfortune to see.

It doesn't have to be racism. It can also just be an observation about the social realities of Gaza at the moment. There can be cultural factors not linked to race, to make Steve's statement true right now.
Exactly. This isn't about race. It's about culture and about the utterly ruthless manipulation by the puppetmasters that are funding the mess.
 
Back on topic, I’m honestly trying to understand how Hamas managed to secure the bodies of the hostages for nearly two years amid constant bombardment. Were they able to move them each time they relocated, or did they have a location that somehow stayed protected the whole time? Gaza’s so densely monitored it’s hard to picture how that could go undetected for so long. The reason I ask is because part of the deal involves returning all the hostages, dead or alive , and given Hamas’s history, it’s hard to see why they’d prioritize safeguarding remains. Maybe Israel already knew where the hostages were and chose to strike anything deemed militant in hopes of pressuring Hamas to release them.
IIRC from that first big hostage release under Biden many of the hostages were kept in home of sympathetic Palestinian families and were actually treated quite well by those families.
Maybe some were, but haven't you been paying attention to the horrors that have been visited upon the hostages?

This whole thing was basically Biden 2.0, the same agreement.

135 hostages (if my math and source is correct) released under Biden. 20 released under Trump. Yet Trump gets all the credit.
I don't think either is actually very relevant.
There is speculation that when Trump and Netanyahu met before the election they agreed to not negotiate for more releases until Trump was elected to keep Biden from having another win.
I see no reason to think this. If it were about not helping Biden it would have happened months ago.
Reports are saying Hamas still hasn’t turned over all the hostages, maybe they’re scrambling to find remains they left behind somewhere along the way.
I haven't heard that but considering how many dead people are still under the rubble of those destroyed buildings it would not surprise me if hostages are not buried among them along with dead captors.
How many are under the rubble? You're taking Hamas' word for it on that. Somehow there are 10,000--and the count doesn't change. That makes no sense--as time goes on the death count of any mass calamity drops as duplicates are resolved. We saw the same thing with the twin towers--10,000 missing, but it actually turned out to be about 2,500. It's a Hamas fabrication, just like basically everything else they say. Most things were evacuated before the bombs fell, there's little reason to think there's any great number in the rubble.
Who said 10,000? Sources I've posted here say Hamas does not count the missing as dead.
 
Palestinians do not have the ability for stable self rule.
That is one of the most vile statements of casual and thoughtless racism it has ever been my misfortune to see.

It doesn't have to be racism. It can also just be an observation about the social realities of Gaza at the moment. There can be cultural factors not linked to race, to make Steve's statement true right now.
Exactly. This isn't about race. It's about culture and about the utterly ruthless manipulation by the puppetmasters that are funding the mess.
Really, it's this.
Unfortunately for the Palestinians in general, and the Gazans in a particular, they are being used as cannon fodder/human shields.

Violent Muslim supremacists are the real problem. No amount of blaming Zionists is going to help.
Tom
 
I would like to note that it was diplomacy, not genocide, that saved these final survivors of the horror. In particular, American influence. Any American president could have chosen to do as Trump has done. Violence freed 8 hostages. 3 were murdered by their rescuers. 168 were rescued by conference. Let the lesson be clear.

I agree that there was no genocide. But I think you are naive if you think Israels military action played no part in getting the hostages freed.

I think the final hostages were freed because Hamas is now strugling to stay in power in Gaza. I think they did it out of necessity. Why are their power fadingin Gaza? Certainly it's because of Israels military actions.
We saw that gang fight--the fact that it happened says a lot about the lack of Hamas control.

And we have the GHF undermining their whole aid-based control. Killing people going for aid wasn't enough to derail it, it had to be stopped lest they fall entirely. Even if that means giving up the hostages.
 
But claiming Islam “forbade the mixing of Muslims with Zoroastrians” or that “the Quran was a Zoroastrian product” is a huge leap. The early Islamic empires absorbed knowledge from conquered regions precisely because the Qur’an encouraged the pursuit of knowledge and reflection on creation , that’s why translation projects like the House of Wisdom thrived under Muslim patronage. The scholars weren’t just preserving Zoroastrian or Greek thought; they were building on it, debating it, correcting it, and producing original work in astronomy, optics, mathematics, and medicine.
Fundamentally, it comes down to whether science is saying things they object to.

We've seen it with multiple religions--when science says something they don't like they go anti-science. And once they go down that path they attack the messenger (science in general) even when it doesn't conflict with their faith.

This isn't in any way unique to Islam. Christianity has been guilty of it on multiple occasions.
 
Palestinians do not have the ability for stable self rule.
That is one of the most vile statements of casual and thoughtless racism it has ever been my misfortune to see.

It doesn't have to be racism. It can also just be an observation about the social realities of Gaza at the moment. There can be cultural factors not linked to race, to make Steve's statement true right now.
Exactly. This isn't about race. It's about culture and about the utterly ruthless manipulation by the puppetmasters that are funding the mess.
Really, it's this.
Unfortunately for the Palestinians in general, and the Gazans in a particular, they are being used as cannon fodder/human shields.

Violent Muslim supremacists are the real problem. No amount of blaming Zionists is going to help.
Tom
If "violent Muslim supremacists" are the real problem, slaughtering thousands of innocent people who aren't "violent Muslism supremacists" is not going to help solve the problem. In fact, I am not seeing any evidence whatseover that slaughtering thousands of people who are "violent Muslim supremacists" is helpful.

Have you noticed how the most powerful nations in the world keep losing wars to ragtag bands of angry religious extremists? You really think it's because their main strategy of killing lots of people was sound, they just didn't kill enough? Next time, they'll be able to kill enough bad guys and peace will reign? How is losing war after bloody war to extremist pseudo-Muslim militias supposed to make anyone safer?
 
I would like to note that it was diplomacy, not genocide, that saved these final survivors of the horror. In particular, American influence. Any American president could have chosen to do as Trump has done. Violence freed 8 hostages. 3 were murdered by their rescuers. 168 were rescued by conference. Let the lesson be clear.
I wonder what will save the next batch of Israeli civilians kidnapped by Gazan militants.
The clear lesson is that violent Muslim supremacists can kidnap civilians and their supporters, like you, will rally to their cause!
Tom
Leave ‘Muslim’ out of it. Like every other conflict, it’s all motivated by money and power, hiding under a cloak of religion.
There are two parts to what he said.

Yes, like every other conflict it's about power (money is a means to power).

But what he was referring to is how much the left supports one of the viler organization on Earth. Why do you bend over backwards to avoid blaming them for what they have done??
 
I wonder what will save the next batch of Israeli civilians kidnapped by Gazan militants.
The clear lesson is that violent Muslim supremacists can kidnap civilians and their supporters, like you, will rally to their cause!
Tom
More than 10,800 posts into this thread, not one of them in support of Muslim supremacists, and you can say ^this^ with a straight face?
When you make excuses for it you are supporting it.

She was wearing a miniskirt? Obviously she wanted it and it wasn't rape! Of course you don't buy that--but it's basically the same thing with this war.
 
Teh Grauniad will print any old rubbish

Many of the 90 bodies of Palestinians returned to Gaza by Israeli authorities under the ceasefire deal showed signs of torture and execution, including blindfolds, cuffed hands and bullet wounds in the head, according to doctors’ accounts. “Almost all of them had been blindfolded, and had been bound up and they had gunshots between the eyes. Almost all of them had been executed,” said Dr Ahmed al-Farra, the head of Nasser hospital’s paediatric department.

Teh Grauniad
It's not that they'll print any old rubbish, it's that if they want access to report from Gaza they have to report what Hamas wants them to report.
 
Back
Top Bottom