I mean, that has been a claim made; but rather the claim that Robert Sapolski does not exist rather than "because free will says".
Believing the self, and as such believing any delineated token, does not really exist, would lead to that conclusion.
Then, the hard determinist sees in Robert Sapolski only the original chaos which took part in him as it was then; it ignores all the growth and change in the middle that's part of the result.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.