• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Ashley Madison hack

 
 
 
Loren Pechtel said:
More on the Ashley Madison database:

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944

Looks like it was almost all men looking, not women responding. It's looking more and more like it was basically a scam.
Click to expand...

That's hilarious. AM might have recovered, but that's the coop-the-grass (as my grandpa used to say). Dudes talking to other dudes pretending to be women, and dudes messaging fake female accounts set up by dudes working for AM. Sounds like there as as much vagina at Ashley Madison as there is at a boy's Catholic school.

It goes to show that the online hook-up culture ain't what it's made out to be.
 
Loren Pechtel said:
More on the Ashley Madison database:

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944

Looks like it was almost all men looking, not women responding. It's looking more and more like it was basically a scam.
Click to expand...

I didn't read the entire article, but it doesn't surprise me. I've seen databases of female dating profiles for sale. A long time a go I joined some smaller dating sites on a free trial and I'd always get "winks" or what were supposed to be women flirting with me. The catch was always that I had to pay to respond. It just reeked of a scam.
 
Bacillus anthracis said:
That's hilarious. AM might have recovered, but that's the coop-the-grass (as my grandpa used to say). Dudes talking to other dudes pretending to be women, and dudes messaging fake female accounts set up by dudes working for AM. Sounds like there as as much vagina at Ashley Madison as there is at a boy's Catholic school.

It goes to show that the online hook-up culture ain't what it's made out to be.
Click to expand...

AM won't recover, but I bet the people behind it are already planning their next site. Maybe they will take bitcoin and advertise that no personal details can be hacked. That would be perfect because there wouldn't be any charge backs.
 
These men who paid money at this site got something for their money.

They got to walk around fantasizing about the sex with a stranger just around the corner.

Better than anti-depressants.
 
TSwizzle said:
DrZoidberg said:
This is what feminists call "the oppression of the patriarchy". The rules (ie social norms) are set up so the women always is to blame. That's why conservatives. They want to conserve these rules. Why there exists female conservatives boggle the mind. Only masochism can explain that. Which is why it's so amusing that convervatives try to claim they're squeeky clean and vanilla. The evidence suggests that they're mostly perverts.
Click to expand...

There's nothing perverted about wanting/having regular sex. And by regular I mean two/three times a week. I can understand men looking elsewhere if his wife has just totally lost interest. I think the pervy/creepy thing is where these religious fools expect their wife to put out at anytime that suits him. Im sure I saw a trailer for a program about it.
Click to expand...

Having general rules about sex which should apply to everybody is by definition perverted. Human sexuality is complex. We're wildly different. The religious "compromise" is to enforce sexual norms that suit nobody. So we're all equally screwed. It's important to understand that men are just as much victims of the oppression of the patriarchy as women. Men are just above women in the hierarchy. But they're just as much slaves to the system. The patriarchal system has no winners. Men just lose slightly less than women.
 
Yes, it appears to be a total scam and these 30mil are most certainly dumbest of the bunch.
What surprises me is AM being so dumb. They should have known that once DB is leaked it's a matter of time before people realize it was a scam. They can and should go to prison now.
 
So does this mean what I think it means? The Duggar son was flirting online with guys? The Duggar boy reads more like a character created by Kurt Vonnegut.
NobleSavage said:
Loren Pechtel said:
More on the Ashley Madison database:

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944

Looks like it was almost all men looking, not women responding. It's looking more and more like it was basically a scam.
Click to expand...

I didn't read the entire article, but it doesn't surprise me. I've seen databases of female dating profiles for sale. A long time a go I joined some smaller dating sites on a free trial and I'd always get "winks" or what were supposed to be women flirting with me. The catch was always that I had to pay to respond. It just reeked of a scam.
Click to expand...
Yeah, why pay for that when you get hot women with the same name repeatedly trying to get you click on their link to friend up on Facebook! :D
 
DrZoidberg said:
TSwizzle said:
There's nothing perverted about wanting/having regular sex. And by regular I mean two/three times a week. I can understand men looking elsewhere if his wife has just totally lost interest. I think the pervy/creepy thing is where these religious fools expect their wife to put out at anytime that suits him. Im sure I saw a trailer for a program about it.
Click to expand...

Having general rules about sex which should apply to everybody is by definition perverted. Human sexuality is complex. We're wildly different.
Click to expand...

I realise human sexuality is complex and varies hugely. What rules ? I didn't say two/three times a week or whatever was a rule it's more an average or is typical for a married (or not) heterosexual couple. Sometimes it's more sometimes it's less, depending on age etc. Some married couples are swingers, out dogging or whatever floats their boat.

DrZoidberg said:
The religious "compromise" is to enforce sexual norms that suit nobody. So we're all equally screwed.
Click to expand...

No we are not. Sexual norms form naturally. The typical "kafflic" has sex before marriage and uses birth control.

DrZoidberg said:
It's important to understand that men are just as much victims of the oppression of the patriarchy as women. Men are just above women in the hierarchy. But they're just as much slaves to the system. The patriarchal system has no winners. Men just lose slightly less than women.
Click to expand...

In some parts of the world no doubt.
 
TSwizzle said:
No we are not. Sexual norms form naturally. The typical "kafflic" has sex before marriage and uses birth control.
Click to expand...

And xenophobia is also natural. That doesn't make it good.

TSwizzle said:
DrZoidberg said:
It's important to understand that men are just as much victims of the oppression of the patriarchy as women. Men are just above women in the hierarchy. But they're just as much slaves to the system. The patriarchal system has no winners. Men just lose slightly less than women.
Click to expand...

In some parts of the world no doubt.
Click to expand...

Ok, I'll bite. Name a place where it doesn't apply? This is true even in super-feminist Sweden
 
Jolly_Penguin said:
Josh Duggar isn't too uncommon a name. He should just say it isn't him. Wrong Josh Duggar.
Click to expand...

He had two accounts linked to addresses either he owned or his family owned.

Trying to deny the obvious I regard as more embarrassing than admitting the truth. Take, for example, the number of men who show up to emergency with objects lodged in their anus.

Isn't it more embarrassing to try to sustain an obvious falsehood that you were hanging curtains while naked, then stepped on a rollerskate and landed in such a way that you happened to land on an object that had lube on it for unrelated reasons?
 
untermensche said:
These men who paid money at this site got something for their money.

They got to walk around fantasizing about the sex with a stranger just around the corner.
Click to expand...

Rather appropriate for the type of man who thinks his wife owes him "access" and that it is her fault he cheats on her.
 
Rhea said:
And if he wants it, by golly, vows or no vows, lies or no lies, he should get it! [/sarcasm]
Really - if he wants sex more and isn't getting it enough, then he has two honorable options:
1. say he's unsatisfied with the amount of sex and ask for ways to increase it or permission to seek it elsewhere
or
2. say he's unsatisfied with the amount of sex and ask for a divorce so that he can seek it elsewhere if #1 doesn't pan out.

Seeking sex elsewhere without permission and in violation of vows is not one of the honorable options.
Click to expand...

Why is a divorce an honorable option? Isn't that the biggest violation of the wedding vows?
 
Blahface said:
Rhea said:
And if he wants it, by golly, vows or no vows, lies or no lies, he should get it! [/sarcasm]
Really - if he wants sex more and isn't getting it enough, then he has two honorable options:
1. say he's unsatisfied with the amount of sex and ask for ways to increase it or permission to seek it elsewhere
or
2. say he's unsatisfied with the amount of sex and ask for a divorce so that he can seek it elsewhere if #1 doesn't pan out.

Seeking sex elsewhere without permission and in violation of vows is not one of the honorable options.
Click to expand...

Why is a divorce an honorable option? Isn't that the biggest violation of the wedding vows?
Click to expand...

Depends on what you promised in your vows, isn't it? Many people are coming up with their own vows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom