Derec
Contributor
People living in $4M houses in LA are more likely to be Democrats though.I’m thinking there are a lot of high figure GQP donors affected,
People living in $4M houses in LA are more likely to be Democrats though.I’m thinking there are a lot of high figure GQP donors affected,
Not so sure about that. They didn't get voted out for spending billions of dollars to build a high speed rail between Merced and Bakersfield. We sure do need a high speed train between two California shithole cities.I’m sure that if the government would try to invest the money it would take to prepare for such a fire they would be voted out for wasteful spending.
To say that Southern California has a "rainy season" would be a rather severe exaggeration. But it's true this isn't the time of year when wildfires were at their most dangerous, in past decades. The climate has changed in some fundamental and permanent ways. CALFire and the Forest Service know it too, but they're working with scraps compared to what they really need to adapt our response system and better educate the public on what they need to do. Actually the public is a pretty serious problem here, too - the mood in this country is angry defiance of anything the government proposes, no matter how simple, obvious, and life-saving. You can't tell ME what days to burn trash on my property and when not to, dammit!Yup, it's actually the rainy season there right now. Yet no rain.It seems to me that addressing wildfires at all requires recognition that the climate has changed in ways that greatly exacerbate fire risk, and a willingness to spend taxpayer money on improving and expanding public safety. Within this thread, you are generally a supporter of a political party that rejects uncensored scientific study of the climate, income taxation, and more than a bare minimum of public spending. You're attempting to portray these wildfires as exclusively the result of Democratic policy, but they seem to me to be a failure of both policy and education, which go far beyond any question of partisan policy. There is no party that believes in supporting fire prevention or preparation if it comes at a significant cost or requires specialized knowledge. Especially during the times of year when there aren't many big fires yet but elections are around the corner.
Those who live there (for instance, the more than two million people who live along that route) may not disagree thatNot so sure about that. They didn't get voted out for spending billions of dollars to build a high speed rail between Merced and Bakersfield. We sure do need a high speed train between two California shithole cities.I’m sure that if the government would try to invest the money it would take to prepare for such a fire they would be voted out for wasteful spending.
Depends which neighborhood. But yes, it is true that Democrats are usually more materially prosperous in life than their Republican counterparts. The latter should spend more time than they do pondering why that might be, instead of just pointlessly griping about it and throwing matches at our pretty houses.People living in $4M houses in LA are more likely to be Democrats though.I’m thinking there are a lot of high figure GQP donors affected,
Not so sure about that. They didn't get voted out for spending billions of dollars to build a high speed rail between Merced and Bakersfield. We sure do need a high speed train between two California shithole cities.
Yep. That was Jerry Brown's little pet project, because as he said, "I likes trains". It was all a total scam regarding the claims of ridership volume, initial cost and financial sustainability. It would have been better for everyone if he satiated his love for trains by buying himself a Lionel train set and setting it up in a spare bedroom. I also think he wanted a legacy of something big for California so he could compete with the big infrastructure projects (e.g. State Water Project) that were started under his father's administration. I get a sick feeling in my stomach whenever I think about how much money is being spent on that boondoggle while our budget deficit continues to skyrocket.Not so sure about that. They didn't get voted out for spending billions of dollars to build a high speed rail between Merced and Bakersfield. We sure do need a high speed train between two California shithole cities.
The people of California did vote to borrow billions to build HSR. But they are easily fooled into voting for these things. They never seem to learn. They keep voting for stupid things. Like Newsom for example.
It would just be so terrible to complete a major infrastructure project successfully!
They've done quite a lot of work on it, actually! There's a route, around 400 miles of which has been acquired and cleared through environmental review. Around 120 miles of rail are currently in the process of being laid. A little over half of the bridges and viaducts needed for the central section are completed, and most of the others are in some stage of construction. The project has also poured $18 billion dollars into the California economy, $7 billion of which were direct wages to California workers. Is it late and overbudget? Yes, but if it were up to you knuckleheads it wouldn't be on time or under budget, it just wouldn't exist at all. So no one would have any work, dreams, or even food on the table, and we'd never join the 20th century, late or otherwise.It would just be so terrible to complete a major infrastructure project successfully!
But they haven't delivered anything!! ffs they have spent billions of dollars since 2008 and delivered fuck all! And there is no sign of anything meaningful being delivered.
Why do you defend this shit?
They've done quite a lot of work on it, actually!It would just be so terrible to complete a major infrastructure project successfully!
But they haven't delivered anything!! ffs they have spent billions of dollars since 2008 and delivered fuck all! And there is no sign of anything meaningful being delivered.
Why do you defend this shit?
There's a route, around 400 miles of which has been acquired and cleared through environmental review. Around 120 miles of rail are currently in the process of being laid.
Is it late and overbudget?
Yes, but if it were up to you knuckleheads it wouldn't be on time or under budget, it just wouldn't exist at all.
In short, fuck your talentless, penniless future, I want one with nice things in it.
California has one of the most complex water collection and delivery systems in the world, which has allowed one of the great world cities to be built and thrive in what is naturally an isolated desert basin. Said system includes more than 1300 reservoirs, that cumulatively store 20 million acre-feet of water and irrigate an agricultural zone which produces fully 12% of the national agricultural supply from less than 40 million acres of land, much of which was also desert or itinerant alkaline lakebed before our canal system was contructed to turn it into a horticultural paradise. You live in a land of wealth, creativity, and technological miracles, and you hate it for no rational reason.Good because we don't fucking need it!! You know what we do need? Reservoirs, build them rather than a dumb vanity project. The voters in California were duped again.
Disneyland was also an innovative, highly lucrative California construction project, which continues to reap considerable dividends for this state and others. Go back to the Middle Ages with your anti-future, anti-intellectual, anti-prosperity nonsense.lol, boo-hoo, you sound like an ill tempered toddler that has just been told they can't go to Disneyland.
California has one of the most complex water {snip}Good because we don't fucking need it!! You know what we do need? Reservoirs, build them rather than a dumb vanity project. The voters in California were duped again.
You live in a land of wealth, creativity, and technological miracles, and you hate it for no rational reason.
Thank fuck Brown and Newsom weren't the ones in charge of that project or we'd still be waiting on it opening.Disneyland was also an innovative, highly lucrative California construction project, which continues to reap considerable dividends for this state and others. Go back to the Middle Ages with your anti-future, anti-intellectual, anti-prosperity nonsense.
Well, another Lake Mead would be nice.So I guess we don't need any more reservoirs?California has one of the most complex water {snip}Good because we don't fucking need it!! You know what we do need? Reservoirs, build them rather than a dumb vanity project. The voters in California were duped again.
Yeah, they should have spent those billions on Santa Monica.I have a problem with a multi billion dollar failed vanity project.
Not really, if you ask me. But the state is also pursuing the construction of two new reservoirs, and the repair or upgrade of several more. A fact for which they are being savagely attacked by the right wing press at the moment! (Owing to the Santa Ynez Reservoir being under repair and therefore empty when the Palisade fire started). Apparently, you all are so fucking stupid that you think reservoirs sould only be built, never maintained, repaired, or improved. Would you agree? Is it a "waste of money" to fix things when they break?So I guess we don't need any more reservoirs?
In July I went from NYC to Buffalo and back, 9 hours each way, overnight. It only makes that trip once a day, so it was packed.only having fucking Greyhound buses to get around on? I mean have you ever actually ridden on one?