bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 34,300
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
The unanimous decision of the full bench of the High Court effectively rules that the jury failed to give adequate weight to the exculpatory evidence provided by defence. That evidence demonstrates that the claims of Pell’s accuser are most likely either;
Deliberately fabricated falsehoods
Sincerely mistaken honest beliefs
Mental delusion/fantasy
You forgot "true", which remains the most likely explanation. The law sets a very high burden of proof on the prosecution, and two of three courts accepted that this burden had been met.