And we all know that whatever military does is automatically a great idea.Not even in the military that preaches unit cohesiveness is this a rule.
Oh yes, sexual violence (or metaphors using it) are perfectly politically correct if the intended victim is a man.[tweet by some feminazi]
Yeah, go talk to Canada about vote splitting and its affect on the Parliament in Ottawa.If he has a plurality, it should depend on what kind of plurality. Do the moderates combined have a majority? Ranked choice voting would solve this.
Polls like this one shed some light on why "moderates" is not a useful category to pit against a single candidate:
View attachment 26233
Which is why he is polling well below 50% in the primaries?You're not wrong. But that knife slices both ways. Bernie never claimed to be the unity candidate
In your own words, Sanders wanted to "fuck over" the real winner last time, and not just the plurality winner.
Sanders didn't deserve to win in 2016. He didn't have the most votes or the movement he has today, and the electorate was not in the place it is now with regard to what he's proposing.
nonsensical post by someone
Which is why he is polling well below 50% in the primaries?Sanders didn't deserve to win in 2016. He didn't have the most votes or the movement he has today, and the electorate was not in the place it is now with regard to what he's proposing.
How am I like this? You said the "electorate was not in the place it is now". This is implying electoral mandate... and getting under 30% in Iowa and NH (a next door primary) isn't a mandate. You keep talking about this huge movement that doesn't exist. Less than 50% polled are supporting candidates with a "M"4A plan.Which is why he is polling well below 50% in the primaries?Sanders didn't deserve to win in 2016. He didn't have the most votes or the movement he has today, and the electorate was not in the place it is now with regard to what he's proposing.
THERE ARE 8 CANDIDATES HOW ARE YOU REALLY LIKE THIS
How am I like this? You said the "electorate was not in the place it is now". This isTHERE ARE 8 CANDIDATES HOW ARE YOU REALLY LIKE THISimplying electoral mandate... and getting under 30% in Iowa and NH (a next door primary) isn't a mandate. You keep talking about this huge movement that doesn't exist. Less than 50% polled are supporting candidates with a "M"4A plan.a man made of straw that I will now stab viciously
How am I like this? You said the "electorate was not in the place it is now". This isTHERE ARE 8 CANDIDATES HOW ARE YOU REALLY LIKE THISimplying electoral mandate... and getting under 30% in Iowa and NH (a next door primary) isn't a mandate. You keep talking about this huge movement that doesn't exist. Less than 50% polled are supporting candidates with a "M"4A plan.a man made of straw that I will now stab viciously
Hiatus time. See you all when Bernie wins
Oh yes, sexual violence (or metaphors using it) are perfectly politically correct if the intended victim is a man.[tweet by some feminazi]
She has a problem with phrases like "grabbing women by the pussy", but is perfectly fine with violence to penisises. Typical feminazi double standards.
I really hated what she did because what we definitely do not need is more political correctness and witch hunts in US politics.Those were exactly my impressions, as well. I liked Warren's performance a lot. She really exposed the flaw in Bloomberg's strategy of buying his way onto that stage.
That is true. He entered the race late and has not been through the baptism of fire that the previous eight debates had been for the rest of the field since the Summer.He had no experience in handling the kind of back-and-forth that the rest of the candidates were familiar with.
As far as I understand the issue, there have been no allegations that MRB abused anybody. All she had against him personally is that he back in the day used some mildly off-color languageIt wasn't about her "me too" issue that he had non-disclosure agreements with women he had allegedly abused--an incredible flaw for Democratic candidates--
I think this has hurt his primary electability far more than his general election electability. The sanctimonious feminist vote that Warren channeled in that barrage is far more concentrated in the former. On the other hand, I am sure there are many men who saw his side too, and there are many men voting in the Dem primaries.but "electability".
So Warren will attack the men, but will defend the woman. She has been more and more gender-based since the clash between her and Bernie two debates ago and is in real danger of becoming a "vote for me because I am a woman" candidate.More importantly, Warren came to Klobuchar's defense, when she was being unfairly attacked for failing a reporter's "gotcha" test on whether she recalled the name of the president of Mexico.
I do not think Klob did well at all. She seemed very frazzled in her exchange with Pete. Warren drew blood, but that will help Biden more than anybody else. Warren's own campaign is still on life support I think.Klobuchar and Warren did quite well in the debate.
I think his point about experience being about more than just a butt in a committee chair for x years was a good one. I liked his zinger about Mondale, but I fear that will hurt him in Minnesota. Btw, had no idea he was still alive. Maybe he could be Veep again - Sanders/Fritz 2020!Buttigieg was OK, but he didn't really have anything of much substance to contribute and still didn't know quite how to handle Klobuchar's pointed references to his lack of experience.
Except Hindenburg was an accident. This was more like USS Arizona.Bloomberg did his best impression of the Hindenburg going down in flames.
No one said that. The person who wins at that convention is the one who ends with the nomination via the established process. All but one candidate said 'let the process work".Does anybody want to talk about how every candidate except the one who is winning said that the party should fuck over whoever wins at the convention
He was no more rude to her than she was to him in previous debates. But I guess it's ok if you are a woman.Pete was just rude to Amy and when he wasn't busy being rude to Amy (I mean: adolescent eye rolls and all!) then he sounded like he had a well rehearsed but terribly flawed speech prepared for debate club.
No surprise you think that. You would default to praising the women on the stage no matter what.Warren and Klobuchar gave the best, most detailed responses.
You do not know that Trump wasn't just using it rhetorically. Besides, feminists are not known to be cool with metaphorical violence toward women at the same time as they employ metaphorical violence toward men.Uh, what? No. Actually grabbing women by the nether regions and then bragging about it is not the same as metaphorically saying someone was punched in the genitalia because they lost an argument. Your post looks ludicrous trying to equate the two.
Plurality < Majority. If the majority of delegates agree to nominate a candidate other than Sanders, then what's wrong with that? Of course, there will be protests if Bernie doesn't get the nomination, but that is beside the point.Seriously, can we? It's great when almost all the candidates running for the DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOMINATION unanimously express their willingness to subvert the will of the people and install whoever reminds them of the last person who lost. Do they realize that Milwaukee will be the epicenter of a national protest that will shut down the fucking country if Bernie gets a plurality of delegates but is denied the nomination...?
...
If someone gets the plurality, who other than that person should be the nominee based on the will of the voters? By definition, no one got more votes than the plurality winner, so anyone they pick will satisfy FEWER people than the plurality winner. ...
Wow, that one breaks every irony meter from the past, the present and in the future.He was no more rude to her than she was to him in previous debates. But I guess it's ok if you are a woman.Pete was just rude to Amy and when he wasn't busy being rude to Amy (I mean: adolescent eye rolls and all!) then he sounded like he had a well rehearsed but terribly flawed speech prepared for debate club.
No surprise you think that. You would default to praising the women on the stage no matter what.Warren and Klobuchar gave the best, most detailed responses.