• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Discipline for children

Been meaning to post this:
I have dear friends who spank their kids, and I always try to talk to them about the science of it. They always respond with, "I know what's best for my kids, just like you know what's best for yours." Which is exactly what I'd say if someone told me that I was doing it wrong. Every kid is different. Every kid has their needs.
However, during those discussions, I'd say there is science that backs up doing something other than spanking. They'd always ask for specifics. I never had them. Until now. So here's an infographic explaining what 36,000 people and 88 studies found.
The biggest takeaway for me? Even if you spank with control, discipline, and good intent, your kids are more likely to have depression and engage in aggressive behavior in adulthood.

http://www.upworthy.com/the-science...pens-to-spanked-kids-when-they-grow-up?c=ufb1

Eyup. Win an argument, lose a friend. My favorite way to go through life. How about comforting the parent for becoming so stressed. You know you mean by his/her need to spank, but you say, it must be difficult on you to have to spank your child. Now if he/she pops off as proud to do it you have another challenge. How would you keep it positive now?
 
I see this thread is still going strong. Not surprising, given the subject matter. But this irks me in this thread:

Having been a child that received timeouts as discipline, spanked as discipline, and hit just because my mother was angry, I think your statement is full of crap.
I notice that you draw a distinction between being spanked as discipline and being hit because your mother was angry. I presume, therefore, that a difference does exist?

Yes, there is a distinction. And the distinction is this:

Emily Lake said:
The problem that I have with your approach throughout this discussion, as well as the approach of many other people, is that you continue to treat any and all spankings as if they are indistinguishable in effect from the most abusive beatings imaginable. And yet you simultaneously seem to assume that all non-physical punishments are completely benign and non-damaging. You repeatedly cast all spankings as "beating" and "hitting", but you cast confinement as nothing more than "time-outs" as if nothing more severe is even imaginable.

Emily Lake nails it with that quote.

It is no secret that I abused as a child. I was routinely beaten, sometimes bloody. To put that on the same level with my friends who had an occasional spanking to keep them in line is absurd. I'll go a step further - I think it's asinine.

Of all the people I've counseled over the years, the some of the ones showing the most emotive damage and dysfunction came from parents who neglected them. Their parents did not give hugs or have overt expressions of love. They used time-outs like weapons. There was one man I met who could not handle being touched - not because he was ever spanked, but simply because his parents had been so intellectually sterile that their discipline was isolation, the withholding of physical affection and an unfair restriction of activities that his brother "the favorite child" enjoyed - an invisible form of abusive neglect that is deemed acceptable in most households simply because it leaves no marks.

Secondly, all kids are not created equal. There are children in this world that do not respond to easy methods of discipline. They require tough love and a drill sergeant mentality. A few of them will even need a physical tussle or two before they reach adulthood. I have several male friends who admit to this - they were so out of line that it took their father or mother actually smacking them silly to snap them out of it. These same friends ended up in the military because they could not function without that kind of hardline discipline to make them better people. And they say out of their own mouths, "Yes, that's what I needed at the time."

Personally, I think parenting is a hard enough job without equating the average parent with villainy. We are not all calm and collected people 24/7. We're human. And as parents, most of us are just learning without anybody to tell us a damn thing. The children do not come here with instruction manuals. And often most of us are unprepared for the emotional and physical toll children cause.

The way I see it, a toddler is not severely damaged by a time out or a swat on the behind. They will remember neither in the coming years. Damage enters the picture when discipline and anger are fused in a toxic mixture. A teenager with bulima might never have been struck, for example, but she will recall all too well the parent who says she is fat with anger and restricts desserts at dinner. To make it plain, I am simply not willing to say a mother with three kids who swatted her toddler after she'd been awake for six weeks breastfeeding is on par with the parent who smacks the kid just for the hell of it. Same goes for the father who comes home after a 12 hour shift to the 7 year old that gets mouthy and slaps him for it. Shit happens. Again, we're human.

I don't see hard lines here. All I see is gray. Perhaps this makes me an unwise parent, given my background. But I find aspects of this discussion tedious for the reasons I've given above.

...and yet it works when nothing else will.

Works? Killing the child also "works"...
And this comment in particular...:confused: Are you for real?
 
I must have lived in special places because it has not been common in my experience.

FYI 1: Toddler tantrums: taming the terrible twos http://www.kidspot.com.au/Toddler-B...-taming-the-terrible-twos+5973+27+article.htm An 'let's ignore this event' comes when the child is looking directly at you when it screams and thrashes about. Be sure to be a caring parent by attending to things that may have precipitated this.

FYI 2 Temper Tantrums: Help, My Kid Won't Calm Down! Practical advice for parents http://www.aboutourkids.org/article...id_won039t_calm_down_practical_advice_parents

Obviously there are enough of us here for such to be well studied, even treated in social and developmental psychology classes to the point of having specialists who specialize on these wee little one complexes.
I don't see how any of this indicates such behavior is "common".
 
This is not a description of a toddler tantrum:

What do you do when they're six, and they repeatedly throw kicking-screaming-meltdowns when they don't get their way? When they throw things and break things and call their parents names and refuse to stay in their room? When they respond with "I don't have to do what you tell me"?

But even if it were, note that the articles you posted were very clear that "spanking" is NOT the answer. :shrug:

...and yet it works when nothing else will.

Works? Killing the child also "works"...
Not so. Dead children won't do their chores, or go to bed, or pretty much do anything they're supposed to.
It is just a matter of how you measure.
There is more that should enter than just being obediant.
 
This is not a description of a toddler tantrum:

What do you do when they're six, and they repeatedly throw kicking-screaming-meltdowns when they don't get their way? When they throw things and break things and call their parents names and refuse to stay in their room? When they respond with "I don't have to do what you tell me"?

But even if it were, note that the articles you posted were very clear that "spanking" is NOT the answer. :shrug:

...and yet it works when nothing else will.

Works? Killing the child also "works"...
Not so. Dead children won't do their chores, or go to bed, or pretty much do anything they're supposed to.
It is just a matter of how you measure.
There is more that should enter than just being obediant.

We are discussing the efficacy of disciplinary methods.

But if you prefer to discuss child-rearing as a whole, dead children fail by most measures. They don't learn or grow, they don't socialize, they fail to become productive, loving adults, and worst of all they never even consider supporting you in your dotage. Except maybe as an ottoman, but you need to have them stuffed or they smell up the place.
 
We are discussing the efficacy of disciplinary methods.

But if you prefer to discuss child-rearing as a whole, dead children fail by most measures. They don't learn or grow, they don't socialize, they fail to become productive, loving adults, and worst of all they never even consider supporting you in your dotage. Except maybe as an ottoman, but you need to have them stuffed or they smell up the place.

Yes, we are discussing the efficacy of disciplinary methods.

The biggest takeaway for me? Even if you spank with control, discipline, and good intent, your kids are more likely to have depression and engage in aggressive behavior in adulthood.

When the data were analyzed to compare the pre- to post intervention changes in compliance for spanking with those for time-outs to take the baseline differences into account, spanking was not found to be more effective than time-outs at increasing children’s immediate compliance to mothers’ commands (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2013).

Parents discipline to achieve not just short-term compliance but long-term changes in behavior. Several studies have examined whether spanking is effective in achieving long-term compliance or promoting the development of conscience, variously operationalized as obedience to commands, resistance to temptation, and evidence of conscience or guilt. More spanking is associated with less long-term compliance and evidence of conscience (Gershoff, 2002; Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2013)

does spanking reduce children’s aggression? The answer is, clearly and definitively, no. In all 27 of he relevant studies, spanking was associated with more, not less, aggression in children (Gershoff, 2002).
spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression over and above initial levels. In none of these longitudinal studies did spanking predict reductions in children’s aggression over time; in other words, spanking was not effective at achieving parents’ desired goal of reducing children’s aggression. Spanking consistently predicted increases in children’s aggression over time, regardless of how aggressive children were when the spanking occurred.

http://www.endhittingusa.org/resour...king-and-child-development-elizabeth-gershoff
 
Last edited:
When the Child is an Adult

and in a position to discipline the adult, let each blow be repaid ten for one. Let blows of the paddle be repaid with blows of the bastinado, let bruises be repaid with broken bones. Let spanking be repaid with whipping, that lawful revenge may be attained.

Readers of the above may discern, I do not approve of corporal punishment. DJ goes further. She approves of the use of 'stand your ground' methods by children against adults. "The adult attacked me with a paddle, a weapon. I was in fear for my life. I used lethal force to defend myself"

Eldarion Lathria
 
FYI 1: Toddler tantrums: taming the terrible twos http://www.kidspot.com.au/Toddler-B...-taming-the-terrible-twos+5973+27+article.htm An 'let's ignore this event' comes when the child is looking directly at you when it screams and thrashes about. Be sure to be a caring parent by attending to things that may have precipitated this.

FYI 2 Temper Tantrums: Help, My Kid Won't Calm Down! Practical advice for parents http://www.aboutourkids.org/article...id_won039t_calm_down_practical_advice_parents

Obviously there are enough of us here for such to be well studied, even treated in social and developmental psychology classes to the point of having specialists who specialize on these wee little one complexes.
I don't see how any of this indicates such behavior is "common".

If a behavior is treated by a certified professional class across several societies he behavior is common.
 
Yes, we are discussing the efficacy of disciplinary methods.

The biggest takeaway for me? Even if you spank with control, discipline, and good intent, your kids are more likely to have depression and engage in aggressive behavior in adulthood.

When the data were analyzed to compare the pre- to post intervention changes in compliance for spanking with those for time-outs to take the baseline differences into account, spanking was not found to be more effective than time-outs at increasing children’s immediate compliance to mothers’ commands (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2013).

Parents discipline to achieve not just short-term compliance but long-term changes in behavior. Several studies have examined whether spanking is effective in achieving long-term compliance or promoting the development of conscience, variously operationalized as obedience to commands, resistance to temptation, and evidence of conscience or guilt. More spanking is associated with less long-term compliance and evidence of conscience (Gershoff, 2002; Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2013)

does spanking reduce children’s aggression? The answer is, clearly and definitively, no. In all 27 of he relevant studies, spanking was associated with more, not less, aggression in children (Gershoff, 2002).
spanking predicted increases in children’s aggression over and above initial levels. In none of these longitudinal studies did spanking predict reductions in children’s aggression over time; in other words, spanking was not effective at achieving parents’ desired goal of reducing children’s aggression. Spanking consistently predicted increases in children’s aggression over time, regardless of how aggressive children were when the spanking occurred.

http://www.endhittingusa.org/resour...king-and-child-development-elizabeth-gershoff

So society pays a price for being a society governed from the top down . So what.

Your turn.
 
Back
Top Bottom