Do Gods Exist?

[RIS]

You don't have data, you have a meaning that you have taken out of context, engaged in the fallacy of equivocation, and anyone who disagrees you gaslight.

You have no real argument. The only way you can win the argument is if everyone on the forum is uninformed enough to make the same conclusion as you based upon a number of faulty premises I have laid out. Deny, defend, but never define.

Imagine having a forum on UFOs insisting that the only ones you could talk about are spaceships.

Unidentified.

 

[pood]

You don't have data, you have a meaning that you have taken out of context, engaged in the fallacy of equivocation, and anyone who disagrees you gaslight.

You have no real argument. The only way you can win the argument is if everyone on the forum is uninformed enough to make the same conclusion as you based upon a number of faulty premises I have laid out. Deny, defend, but never define.

Faulty premises, from a guy who says the ruler of North Korea is “literally a god.”

In your “meaning of the bible” thread Learner wondered if you are a Jehovah’s Witness. Are you?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

You don't have data, you have a meaning that you have taken out of context, engaged in the fallacy of equivocation, and anyone who disagrees you gaslight.

You have no real argument.

Of course, I do. You have come into the forum using senses of the word god inconsistent with the implied context of the forum. You even gave ridiculous examples no one on the planet would consider to be gods in this context, like: "money." You cannot take the forum out of context in order to say "See? That was easy! What is it you idiots don't understand?!" That's just the fallacy of equivocation followed by some gaslighting.

The only way you can win the argument is if everyone on the forum is uninformed enough to make the same conclusion as you based upon a number of faulty premises I have laid out. Deny, defend, but never define.

You are the one trying to define things and you did so using out of context senses of the word "god."

Imagine having a forum on UFOs insisting that the only ones you could talk about are spaceships.

Imagine a SETI website that has a forum entitled "The Existence of Aliens" and someone like you comes along posting:
Thread title: "Do Aliens Exist?"
Post#1: "Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion."
Post#5: "Melania Trump is an alien. She exists."
Post#7:

Oxford Dictionary definition of Alien:

1. an (intelligent) being not from the earth
2. a person who is not a citizen of the country in which they live or work

 

[RIS]

Imagine a SETI website that has a forum entitled "The Existence of Aliens" and someone like you comes along posting:
Thread title: "Do Aliens Exist?"
Post#1: "Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion."
Post#5: "Melania Trump is an alien. She exists."

Well, is that wrong? Imagine the definition of an axenophobe was one who doesn't believe or lacks belief in Melania or aliens.

Oxford Dictionary definition of Alien:
1. an (intelligent) being not from the earth
2. a person who is not a citizen of the country in which they live or work

It's irresponsible for a scientist to withhold data. Why did you expurgate that?

 

[RIS]

Faulty premises, from a guy who says the ruler of North Korea is “literally a god.”

Kim Jong Un is a God in North Korea (Source: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Imagine a SETI website that has a forum entitled "The Existence of Aliens" and someone like you comes along posting:
Thread title: "Do Aliens Exist?"
Post#1: "Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion."
Post#5: "Melania Trump is an alien. She exists."

Well, is that wrong?

Yes it is wrong because a SETI website comes with a context of extra-terrestrial beings, i.e. SETI is an acronym an their content would be about such, not immigrants. So, sense#2 would be taking it out of context. If you don't get that, then we can all see the problem here. Also, you attributed the post to pood. This is getting very bizarre.

 

[DBT]

Equivocation is a thing.

 

[Elixir]

Yes it is wrong because a SETI website comes with a context of extra-terrestrial beings

So, she’s only an extraterrestrial alien when she jumps. Or is on a flying airplane. She still exists. Webster says.
Are we having fun yet?

 

[pood]

Faulty premises, from a guy who says the ruler of North Korea is “literally a god.”

Kim Jong Un is a God in North Korea (Source: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

Do you think he is a god in No. 1 or No. 2 definitions in Oxford? A yes/no would suffice instead of bafflegab.

 

[pood]

Imagine a SETI website that has a forum entitled "The Existence of Aliens" and someone like you comes along posting:
Thread title: "Do Aliens Exist?"
Post#1: "Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion."
Post#5: "Melania Trump is an alien. She exists."

Well, is that wrong? Imagine the definition of an axenophobe was one who doesn't believe or lacks belief in Melania or aliens.

Oxford Dictionary definition of Alien:
1. an (intelligent) being not from the earth
2. a person who is not a citizen of the country in which they live or work

It's irresponsible for a scientist to withhold data. Why did you expurgate that?

Why are you wrongly quoting me, and then responding to yourself?

 

[aupmanyav]

Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion.

Bad home-page. Does not give the purpose in the first instance. And who has the time to search through?

 

[RIS]

Imagine a SETI website that has a forum entitled "The Existence of Aliens" and someone like you comes along posting:
Thread title: "Do Aliens Exist?"
Post#1: "Yes. Piece of cake. Don't understand the confusion."
Post#5: "Melania Trump is an alien. She exists."

Well, is that wrong? Imagine the definition of an axenophobe was one who doesn't believe or lacks belief in Melania or aliens.

Oxford Dictionary definition of Alien:
1. an (intelligent) being not from the earth
2. a person who is not a citizen of the country in which they live or work

It's irresponsible for a scientist to withhold data. Why did you expurgate that?

Why are you wrongly quoting me, and then responding to yourself?

Typo. The quote was meant to apply to all manufacturers of dairy food products.

I mean @Don2 (Don1 Revised) I was responding to myself because there was a lag in the quality of the discourse. Normal service will resume as soon as possible.

 

[RIS]

Bad home-page. Does not give the purpose in the first instance. And who has the time to search through?

Patience is one of the most important virtues for developing mindfulness and concentration.

 

[RIS]

Do you think he is a god in No. 1 or No. 2 definitions in Oxford? A yes/no would suffice instead of bafflegab.

No. 3. I've pointed it out, what? Three times?

 

[Jarhyn]

You don't have data, you have a meaning that you have taken out of context, engaged in the fallacy of equivocation, and anyone who disagrees you gaslight.

You have no real argument. The only way you can win the argument is if everyone on the forum is uninformed enough to make the same conclusion as you based upon a number of faulty premises I have laid out. Deny, defend, but never define.

Imagine having a forum on UFOs insisting that the only ones you could talk about are spaceships.

Unidentified.

Dude, I linked you to a whole page of definitions, and I notice that you continue to fail to actually use them... Or any definitions at all... When discussing any such concept.

 

[Jarhyn]

Also, really? It's absolutely insane to argue the existence of God based on a definition that has nothing to do with creation, administration, or privileges within a system or simulation.

It is semantically non-sequitur.

 

[Elixir]

God stories exist.
Yaaaawn.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

I stand corrected.