• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Don't the Democrats have a better candidate than Hillary Cllnton?

donald-trump.jpg


To be fair, if you want to get fucked, Trump is your guy.
I'd prefer Lewinsky.

Monica isn't running Derec. Seems you don't get what you want very often, eh?
 

She is Brian Williams of politics. ;)



It is obvious to the most casual observer that this made up story does not make her a "pathological liar".
nor corrupt, nor has any apparent health issues.
She has been on warfarin since her blood clot/concussion three years ago. Before that, she was on a weaker anticoagulant since the 90s, when she had a previous blood clot. That's not a picture of health.
People live long lives on these drugs.
Trump takes one, too.
You claim she's a weak candidate while the majority of scientists, military generals, economists, Fortune 100 CEOs, Newspaper editorial boards all overwhelmingly endorse her.
How much of that is that they like Hillary vs. that they really dislike Trump?
There has been a campaign of personal attacks on Trump much more severe than anything ever directed at Hillary. Some of it justified, some not.
Says the guy who posted the monica lewinsky picture.
You're becoming a cartoon of yourself, Derec.
 
How much of that is that they like Hillary vs. that they really dislike Trump?
Their motives do not matter given the choices.
There has been a campaign of personal attacks on Trump much more severe than anything ever directed at Hillary.
Utter nonsense. The bullshit about Clinton's health and Benghazi outweigh all the attacks on the Donald combined.
 
We have an absurd situation where Donald Trump might be the next President of the United States.If that happens I think a lot of the balmce should be with the Democrats for putting up a widely mistrusted, disliked liability as their candidate.

Surely any one who was even remotely popular could beat Trump?

Bullshit. The blame will rest solely with the American voters who continually show that they will believe anything they are told. There is no-one in either party better qualified to be POTUS than Clinton.
 
We have an absurd situation where Donald Trump might be the next President of the United States.If that happens I think a lot of the balmce should be with the Democrats for putting up a widely mistrusted, disliked liability as their candidate.

Surely any one who was even remotely popular could beat Trump?

Bullshit. The blame will rest solely with the American voters who continually show that they will believe anything they are told.

Ah, but the politicians KNOW that. And Debbie and the rest of the DNC knew that when they put a lid on Bernie and sat on it.

There is no-one in either party better qualified to be POTUS than Clinton.

Also doesn't matter - the electorate will believe what they're told. And apparently, when they're told contradictory things, they believe that which is most repeated. That's why Trump habitually repeats his lies three or four times whenever he speaks. It works.
 
There is no-one in either party better qualified to be POTUS than Clinton.

Seriously?

Your country is FUBAR then. Truly FUBAR. She's the best you've got?
Coming from the land that elected Steven Harper that is fucking hilarious.

More importantly, the best person on paper may not necessarily be the best person for a job.
 
To be fair, if you want to get fucked, Trump is your guy.

Oh for fuck's sake, Derec, really?
What a shallow and stupid remark to make. Even MORE shallow and stupid to post someone else saying. Are you 12?

what is wrong with you?

Not surprising he would post that. He and Trump are two peas in a pod when it comes to their disdain for women. If their husband cheats on them it has to be their fault.
 
There is no-one in either party better qualified to be POTUS than Clinton.

Seriously?

Your country is FUBAR then. Truly FUBAR. She's the best you've got?

She is the best we have on the ballot. Yes, it's FUBAR.

Ah, but the politicians KNOW that. And Debbie and the rest of the DNC knew that when they put a lid on Bernie and sat on it.
Thank you for illustrating my point.

You can certainly blame the electorate for being stupid. Or you can blame the DNC for being stupid and devious.
 
You can certainly blame the electorate for being stupid. Or you can blame the DNC for being stupid and devious.
Voters have proven to be stupid on many occasions. Bernie Sanders lost his bid for the nomination regardless of the DNC.

Sanders voters also prove my point. Almost 20% of them say they will vote for Johnson. It's hard to imagine anything more stupid than that. Trump probably has more in common with Sanders than Johnson. Johnson is about as far from Sanders politically as one can get. Voting Green would make more sense, although politically they would still be stabbing Bernie in the back, since voting for anyone but Clinton is the same as voting for Trump, which means all the policies that Sanders fought for will never come to pass if Trump gets elected-it's going to be tough even if Clinton gets elected with a republican congress, but at least she will appoint judges who may reinstate McCain Feingold, and allow us to enact better campaign finance reform if we ever get a progressive congress.

It's frustrating being a progressive when you realize that you will never get a majority because a significant proportion of your fellow progressives are too stupid to even understand that libertarians have nothing in common with us.

Except weed.
 
Back
Top Bottom