*Sigh* I never said that and you know it full well. Both men and women can be good or bad. The problem is that our society is biased in favor of women (female privilege) in many areas which allows evil women to thrive.
Some definitely do. As do some whites. Attack a cop, expect to get shot. As simple as that. Michael Brown never deserved the support he got.
I own my words. I do not own your mischaracterization of them.
Derec said:
Derec said:
Derec said:
That's the way I was raised.
No you don't.
Care to take vote on that?
Well yeah. You clearly aren't getting the point. I was hoping the larger font would make it harder to go in one "ear" and out the other.
When there are virtually never any trials, that gives the impression of no due process.
Most black deaths at the hands of the police have also not led to rioting.
Which very likely wouldn't be happening if 1) video didn't pop up and 2) there wasn't this level of unrest due to the apparent lack of due process. There are people here who still think shooting an unarmed man in the back is acceptable.
Well, you are just generally for burning the wheat fields.
I get the point, such as it is, that you were trying to make.
Going to trial for political expediency when there is not sufficient evidence against the cop is the exact opposite of due process.
That's because most are not questionable at all, except for hardcore black supremacist like those writing for rags like San Francisco Bay View.
Or some other evidence. But you need evidence to prosecute.
It depends on the circumstances. BLM types wave the word "unarmed" around as if it was synonymous with "harmless". Michael Brown was unarmed. So what? He still attacked the police officer.
No, BLM is as got as they can use the fire to "fry [pigs] like bacon".
As much as I disliked the way they heckled Bernie Saunders (because I wanted to hear what he had to say), the tactic was actually very effective. Since the two incidents, Bernie Saunders has made racism and disparity in policing a far more visible part of his campaign. Same with Hilary Clinton. Time will tell if anything more meaningful results, but for now BLM has most certainly succeeded in getting people (including us here) to at least discuss/argue about the issue.
Such a tactic is only effective if the candidates allow it to be. Unfortunately neither Bernie nor Hillary showed the testicular fortitude to stand up to BLM.
None of what I wrote was false.
He was waving it before. If the gun still had the orange tip there likely would not have been a 911 call in the first place.
I agree the cops acted hastily. But you, and others keep harping that he was an innocent kid playing. However, given his size and realistic look of the weapon it certainly did not look like a kid playing.
I am just trying to provide some facts and explanation why the tragedy happened. When people think "12 year old shot while playing" they usually do not imagine a 5'7" 190 lbs person with a realistic looking gun. Very different image, don't you think?
BLM spent comparatively little time on Tamir Rice anyway. They prefer to defend actual thugs.
Why should anyone "stand up" against what is right? In my opinion, it is those who try to malign and sideline the Black Lives Matter movement who lack "the testicular fortitude to stand up" for what is right... or they are racists... whichever.
