• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

England headed for A Caliphate

The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.

"Devolved into". Marx invented the word "Marxism" to describe the stuff the French kept doing.

Yeah, French rioters often have the goal to bring down the regime, and often succeed. Perhaps this time they'll get an emperor or a king again? Their rioting rarely works out the way they envisioned it.

French modern history is fascinating. The funny thing is that out of UK and France, the UK used to be the stable one. Times change
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.

"Devolved into". Marx invented the word "Marxism" to describe the stuff the French kept doing.

Yeah, French rioters often have the goal to bring down the regime, and often succeed.

Not for a long time.

Perhaps this time they'll get an emperor or a king again? Their rioting rarely works out the way they envisioned it.

They will get an Ayatollah after the useful idiot lefties and malcontents have been disposed of.

French modern history is fascinating. The funny thing is that out of UK and France, the UK used to be the stable one. Times change

Who will topple first, England or France I wonder.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.
Yeah, the far right's ever present list of boogeymen.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.

"Devolved into". Marx invented the word "Marxism" to describe the stuff the French kept doing.

Yeah, French rioters often have the goal to bring down the regime, and often succeed.

Not for a long time.

Perhaps this time they'll get an emperor or a king again? Their rioting rarely works out the way they envisioned it.

They will get an Ayatollah after the useful idiot lefties and malcontents have been disposed of.

How do you envisage that happening? There's an awful lot of steps that needs to happen first.


French modern history is fascinating. The funny thing is that out of UK and France, the UK used to be the stable one. Times change

Who will topple first, England or France I wonder.

I think neither. I see the last dying remnants of the woke giving it one last shot. There is already a strong conservative reaction brewing. That's what I think will happen.
 
Is an urgent need of the billionaire class to have plenty of people on the edge of starvation, desperate to serve them for a crust.

Billionaires need people who can afford <or desperately need> to buy what they're selling.
FIFY
Can you remind me who desperately needs Starlink,...

who desperately needs Starlink,
Billionaires waging war, mostly.
or an electric car,
Musk.
So, not people on the edge of starvation, then.

or a PowerWall,
I don’t even know what. Power wall is.
It's a big battery. Basically the same technology as in a Tesla electric car, just stationary, to supply backup power to a house during outages instead of powering a car.

or her satellite launched on a Falcon 9
Power wall is a “she”?
:consternation2: Dude. The antecedent of "she" in my sentence was "who". You claimed billionaires urgently need all these people on the edge of starvation who desperately need what the billionaires are selling, so I'm asking you who they are. You say there are plenty, so you should be able to give us an example of one. I'm calling your hypothetical person in desperate need "her" because I'm calling Musk "him" and I wanted the pronouns to be distinguishable.

Sounds more like something that billionaires need people to be able to afford rather than desperately need.
I know, right? That's why I said that. "Billionaires need people who can afford to buy what they're selling." Musk needs rich people who can afford the expensive batteries he sells. Then you changed what I wrote to "Billionaires need people who can afford <or desperately need> to buy what they're selling." and said "FIFY". Why did you do that? Why do you think that's fixing an error on my part? How do you figure Musk needs people who desperately need big batteries but can't afford them? What does he need them for?

None of the above, afaict, addresses the dynamic I pointed out.
You didn't point out a dynamic! You asserted one. So I looked where you pointed, and there's no dynamic there, no population of desperately needy folks who Musk urgently needs to be on the edge of starvation. If they really exist, point them out.

can you explain how Musk makes money from her desperately needing what she doesn't buy from him?
Nope. Can explain that. I don’t even know who or what “she” is.
The fact remains that poor* people are rich people’s greatest asset.
So, proof by blatant assertion, then. You appear to be assuming you don't need to provide evidence for your claim because I should recognize it as obviously correct, and assuming it's obviously correct because Musk has billions of dollars so he must have impoverished somebody to the tune of billions of dollars, and assuming that inference is obviously correct because economics is a zero-sum game.

* a relative term
Is "on the edge of starvation" also a relative term?
 
  • Love
Reactions: WAB
Who the fuck still uses woke as a term in fucking 2026? Those tired old retards really need to shut the fuck up.

I do. Today I see a clear split in the left. One side is the gender queer theory intersectional postmodernists, known by their critics as "woke" and the good old regular liberal/socialist progressive types who care about stuff like class consciousness. I'm the second type.

I think the fourth wave intersectional feminist path the left started down in the late 90'ies was a mistake. The people who don't think it was a mistake I call "woke".

I care about the left and I care about progressive values. I personally think wokeness will be completely dead in 10 years and it'll be seen as a collective insanity.

This is a bit of a tangent, but something that really annoys me is, I don't think going on about how guilty white people are helps anything.

First off, I think its wrong holding people responsible for something they didn't do.

Secondly, we're all decendants of horrible people somewhere in the family tree. The past was an awful place.

And thirdly it's insulting a huge group of people we'd like to have as allies. A white working class European is not more priviliged than a middle-class Nigerian. Obviously. Zeroing in on race to this degree (like the woke do) infantilises us all.
That rant makes you as relevant as Bill Maher.
 
Who the fuck still uses woke as a term in fucking 2026? Those tired old retards really need to shut the fuck up.

I do. Today I see a clear split in the left. One side is the gender queer theory intersectional postmodernists, known by their critics as "woke" and the good old regular liberal/socialist progressive types who care about stuff like class consciousness. I'm the second type.

I think the fourth wave intersectional feminist path the left started down in the late 90'ies was a mistake. The people who don't think it was a mistake I call "woke".

I care about the left and I care about progressive values. I personally think wokeness will be completely dead in 10 years and it'll be seen as a collective insanity.

This is a bit of a tangent, but something that really annoys me is, I don't think going on about how guilty white people are helps anything.

First off, I think its wrong holding people responsible for something they didn't do.

Secondly, we're all decendants of horrible people somewhere in the family tree. The past was an awful place.

And thirdly it's insulting a huge group of people we'd like to have as allies. A white working class European is not more priviliged than a middle-class Nigerian. Obviously. Zeroing in on race to this degree (like the woke do) infantilises us all.
That rant makes you as relevant as Bill Maher.

Yeah, I know. Which is one of the big problems in the world right now. Certainly for the politics. The left has been completely corrupted by woke. Their echo chambers are deaf to any leftist voice of reason. And they're so intolerant. If you don't buy into the whole pomo package you're labelled as a fascist, racist, homophobe etc. It's so extreme. I hope it dies as soon as possible
 
That rant makes you as relevant as Bill Maher.

Yeah, I know. Which is one of the big problems in the world right now. Certainly for the politics. The left has been completely corrupted by woke. Their echo chambers are deaf to any leftist voice of reason. And they're so intolerant. If you don't buy into the whole pomo package you're labelled as a fascist, racist, homophobe etc. It's so extreme. I hope it dies as soon as possible
Good luck with that. The Girondists and the Mensheviks hoped for the same. "Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children."
 
The left has been completely corrupted by woke.
Oh really?
🙄
I am completely corrupted by a right wing characterization of most of those who oppose fascism?
YOU and your ilk are completely corrupted by that right wing trope, to which you have become enthusiastically and stupidly addicted. .
 
Is "on the edge of starvation" also a relative term?
Not only is it that, it is also subjective.
A farsighted billionaire doesn’t have literally starving minions - they get fucking weak if you deprive them of food. Fear of deprivation will suffice to keep ‘em working, as long as it’s credible.
Have you never been food-insecure? It’s a powerful motivator, B.

.As a relative term, “starvation” can mean literally insufficient caloric intake to maintain biological function, or it can mean getting kicked out of the billionaire club.
 
That rant makes you as relevant as Bill Maher.

Yeah, I know. Which is one of the big problems in the world right now. Certainly for the politics. The left has been completely corrupted by woke. Their echo chambers are deaf to any leftist voice of reason. And they're so intolerant. If you don't buy into the whole pomo package you're labelled as a fascist, racist, homophobe etc. It's so extreme. I hope it dies as soon as possible
Good luck with that. The Girondists and the Mensheviks hoped for the same. "Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children."

Hmm. Well. I don't know if you have noticed but Marx won all over the world. There's not a single country on Earth today that isn't in part socialist and follow some socialist principles. Marxism became so all pervasive that we've become blind to what ideas come from Marx.

That's the reality today. There's no serious debate anywhere about removing all socialist programmes. All discussions isn't "if", but "how much".

I don't see any risk in any country that socialism is going anywhere. Me personally, I think Europe right now would benefit from a bit less socialism. I think we've gotten a bit fat and lazy the last 50 years.

The problem with the Mensheviks were that they were in Russia. Labour in the UK (the same type of socialists) are doing just fine. Its the same with all liberal/social democratic parties all over the west.

The Girondists only temporarily lost. Girondist type socialists are now ruling France

So I am not sure what you are talking about?

I'd say socialist dominance is pretty unthreatened at the moment. I'd say its so unthreatened in Europe, at the moment, that it hampers economic growth.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.

"Devolved into". Marx invented the word "Marxism" to describe the stuff the French kept doing.

Yeah, French rioters often have the goal to bring down the regime, and often succeed.

Not for a long time.

Perhaps this time they'll get an emperor or a king again? Their rioting rarely works out the way they envisioned it.

They will get an Ayatollah after the useful idiot lefties and malcontents have been disposed of.

How do you envisage that happening? There's an awful lot of steps that needs to happen first.


French modern history is fascinating. The funny thing is that out of UK and France, the UK used to be the stable one. Times change

Who will topple first, England or France I wonder.

I think neither. I see the last dying remnants of the woke giving it one last shot. There is already a strong conservative reaction brewing. That's what I think will happen.

Woke? Woke is not what the war is about. This is a war for Western civilization against the islamic hordes. A war that has been waged by islam since its inception.
 
The UK has really taken a dark turn down woke lane. It's just getting crazier and crazier. Can someone explain wtf has happened to the UK and why it's like this now? I can't think of any country as polarised as the UK now.

It's not just the UK. It's all across Europe (except Poland of course which has resisted mass immigration). Germany, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Denmark. Have you seen what is going on in France?!!

French people rioting is not news and nothing that started with immigration. You make it sound like the French ever stopped rioting.

Sure, it didn't start with immigration but it has now devolved into far left, Marxist, anarchist and muslim migrants attacking the French republic with the intent of destroying it. They might be a tad early to actually succeed in that goal but that cheque is in the post fella.

"Devolved into". Marx invented the word "Marxism" to describe the stuff the French kept doing.

Yeah, French rioters often have the goal to bring down the regime, and often succeed.

Not for a long time.

Perhaps this time they'll get an emperor or a king again? Their rioting rarely works out the way they envisioned it.

They will get an Ayatollah after the useful idiot lefties and malcontents have been disposed of.

How do you envisage that happening? There's an awful lot of steps that needs to happen first.


French modern history is fascinating. The funny thing is that out of UK and France, the UK used to be the stable one. Times change

Who will topple first, England or France I wonder.

I think neither. I see the last dying remnants of the woke giving it one last shot. There is already a strong conservative reaction brewing. That's what I think will happen.

Woke? Woke is not what the war is about. This is a war for Western civilization against the islamic hordes. A war that has been waged by islam since its inception.

I think the western wokes are enabling the Islamists. Islam is partly an imperialistic ideology. It needs to be managed somehow. Islam is also a victimhood culture. So Muslims are cool with the project of their ever expansion of the caliphate being stopped. They get to moan about it = win. In the west, the Muslims are really not trying that hard.

But we need to stop them. Non-Muslims need to put down our foot and stop tolerating their agressive behaviour. Muslims are basically continuosly poking at the social fabric to see what they can get away with.

This is where wokes come in. Western bleeding heart liberals are enabling the Islamists. Instead of pushing back they're bending over backwards to make excuses for the Islamists.

But Islam is also a lot of other things. Its a complex faith. I just mentioned the two aspects relevant for this discussion
 
Yeah, I know. Which is one of the big problems in the world right now. Certainly for the politics. The left has been completely corrupted by woke. Their echo chambers are deaf to any leftist voice of reason. And they're so intolerant. If you don't buy into the whole pomo package you're labelled as a fascist, racist, homophobe etc. It's so extreme. I hope it dies as soon as possible
Good luck with that. The Girondists and the Mensheviks hoped for the same. "Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children."

Hmm. Well. I don't know if you have noticed but Marx won all over the world. There's not a single country on Earth today that isn't in part socialist and follow some socialist principles. Marxism became so all pervasive that we've become blind to what ideas come from Marx.

That's the reality today. There's no serious debate anywhere about removing all socialist programmes. All discussions isn't "if", but "how much".
What are you smoking? Of course you're equivocating on the word "socialist"; I guess that's become pretty much de rigueur -- but equivocating on the word "Marx" is over the top. No, Marx has not won all over the world; he's won in Cuba and in North Korea and in the halls of university literary criticism departments. The principles you're labeling "socialist" that every country in the world follows are not ideas that come from Marx; they're ideas from the various competing currents within 19th-century leftist ideology that Marx spent his career opposing. Marx's version of "socialism" was all about abolishing private ownership of the means of production and doing away with the profit motive. The so-called "socialism" that has become all-pervasive is all about financing social programs, a safety net, and income flattening by harnessing the profit motive -- by leaving private ownership of the means of production intact and taking a cut of its profits. That's the opposite of Marx's ideas. Out of all the socialist ideas that have "won all over the world", which ones do you imagine came from Marx?

The Girondists only temporarily lost. Girondist type socialists are now ruling France
:consternation2: Again, what are you smoking? "Girondist type socialist" is a contradiction in terms. The Girondists were free-marketeers -- they're called leftists because they were for the main leftist program of the day: abolishing the monarchy. Talk of socialism at all at that stage of the Revolution is a bit anachronistic -- they were guillotined in 1793, whereas recognizably socialist ideology didn't really show up there until the late 1790s -- but the Girondists were even opposed to the proto-socialist policies like price controls the revolutionary government was starting to put in place.

So I am not sure what you are talking about?
I was talking about the tendency of revolutionary movements to become dominated by their extremists, and the tendency of their moderates to wind up sent into exile or to gulags like the Mensheviks, or just liquidated like the Girondists. Expecting the leftist echo chamber ever to stop being deaf to any leftist voice of reason is a hope without much of a track record to base that hope on.

I'd say socialist dominance is pretty unthreatened at the moment. I'd say its so unthreatened in Europe, at the moment, that it hampers economic growth.
Ya think??? The problem with a golden goose is there are always more people trying to force the goose to lay golden eggs faster than people trying to keep the goose alive.
 
Back
Top Bottom