• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Epstein, Kiddies, And Trump. Oh, My

She was a victim of circumstances.
That's not what the article was implying, and you know it.

IMHO, it is sleazy for men of Gaetz’s age snd higher to buy sex from teenagers. Certainly without such sleazes, the demand for teenage prostitues would be much less,
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers?
What if this chick had given a false age of 20? Would Gaetz not have been "sleazy" any more? Or would you still find some reason to condemn him?

I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
 
She was a victim of circumstances.
That's not what the article was implying, and you know it.
I know she was a victim of circumstances.
IMHO, it is sleazy for men of Gaetz’s age snd higher to buy sex from teenagers. Certainly without such sleazes, the demand for teenage prostitues would be much less,
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers?
I wrote “teenagers”. She claimed to be 18. I stand by my statement.
What if this chick had given a false age of 20? Would Gaetz not have been "sleazy" any more? Or would you still find some reason to condemn him?
There are plenty of reasons to think Matt Gaetz is sleazy. Do you need a list?

I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
I know I didn’t say anything like that because I have no idea about your “whataboutism”.
 
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers who look like children?
Added the bit you "forgot" to include in your rhetorical question.

With that clause restored, the answer is clearly "yes".

It's perhaps, in some circumstances, not immoral. In some jurisdictions, it's not illegal. But yes, it's absolutely and unquestionably sleazy.
 
I find it quite hypocritical that Gaetz is mercilessly attacked for this while we are told on this forum that a Democratic state legislator getting child porn of 5 year olds (!) is not a big deal because New Hampshire is a small state.
Are these things both being done by the same poster, or do you just not know what "hypocritical" even means?
 
She claimed to be an adult. Is it "sleazy" to seek out adult sex workers who look like children?
Added the bit you "forgot" to include in your rhetorical question.
Why do you say that she looked like a "child" - to the point of falsifying my comment? Does she have Hutchinson-Gilford or something?
'
Be specific. Or are you simply assuming?
 
Are these things both being done by the same poster, or do you just not know what "hypocritical" even means?
To use the term so beloved by that particular poster, you are part of his "Ilk".

But let me ask you specifically, do you agree with him that Stacie-Marie Laughton is not a big deal, but that Matt Gaetz is?
 
Back
Top Bottom