• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Europe submits voluntarily

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're done.

Just move on.

And remember the time you were so ignorant you thought governments were so saintly they could not possibly commit acts of terrorism.
 
There has to be a war for there to be a war crime.

A terrorist attack is not a war.

Did the US Congress declare war?
 
Stupidity.

The only insane love for governments here is the clown that thinks governments can't commit acts of terrorism.
 
Stupidity.

Only the insane love for governments here is the clown that thinks governments can't commit war crimes.

I never said it.

What I said was an unprovoked attack of a weaker nation by a stronger nation to change the weaker nation's government is state terrorism.

If a nation is at war it's leaders can commit war crimes.

But aggressive attack is not war.

I suppose you think if some unprovoked adult punches a young child in the face that is a fight, not criminal assault.
 
Stupidity.

Your position is deeply immoral.

You just love government.

What is stupidity is the idea that nations cannot commit terrorism.

There is no argument that demonstrates it so I have to wade through ignorant shit for pages.

And the person shitting is crying because I'm saying it stinks.
 
You don't want to admit that government commits war crimes.

It is because you love government.

The topic is terrorism and some ignoramus claiming that nations can't commit terrorism.

An empty claim without any evidence or argument.

Something a three year old might say.

While I provide clear evidence the US State Department definitely believes nations can commit terrorism.

I could provide article after article of people talking about state terrorism.

And there is NOTHING to say they can't.
 
Even when Germany deports criminal fakefugees, they can't seem to make it stick.
Afghanistan sends deported asylum-seeker back to Germany
Deutsche Welle said:
The government of Afghanistan has denied entry to a failed asylum-seeker deported by Germany. The Afghans say the man was turned back at the border as per agreement with the German government because he's mentally ill.
In an article designed to raise the hackles of those worried about foreigners and crime, German daily Bild reported on Thursday that Afghanistan had turned away an Afghan deportee with a long criminal record at its border and sent him back to Germany.
The attempted deportation was carried out earlier this week, but unlike other deportees aboard the plane to Kabul, 23-year-old Mortaza D. was refused entry and flown back to Munich.
That's a rotten agreement if I ever saw one!
If Afghanistan doesn't want him, tough shit, he is an Afghan and thus their responsibility. Germany should not be required to take him back, mental illness or not. Where is it written that Germany and other Western countries are responsible for mentally ill citizens of other countries? Especially when they are also habitual criminals?
 
Violence and mental illness: an overview

Several general conclusions are supported by this brief overview. First, mental disorders are neither necessary, nor sufficient causes of violence. The major determinants of violence continue to be socio-demographic and socio-economic factors such as being young, male, and of lower socio-economic status.

Second, members of the public undoubtedly exaggerate both the strength of the relationship between major mental disorders and violence, as well as their own personal risk from the severely mentally ill. It is far more likely that people with a serious mental illness will be the victim of violence.

Third, substance abuse appears to be a major determinant of violence and this is true whether it occurs in the context of a concurrent mental illness or not. Those with substance disorders are major contributors to community violence, perhaps accounting for as much as a third of self-reported violent acts, and seven out of every 10 crimes of violence among mentally disordered offenders.

Finally, too much past research has focussed on the person with the mental illness, rather than the nature of the social interchange that led up to the violence. Consequently, we know much less than we should about the nature of these relationships and the contextual determinants of violence, and much less than we should about opportunities for primary prevention (30). Nevertheless, current literature supports early identification and treatment of substance abuse problems, and greater attention to the diagnosis and management of concurrent substance abuse disorders among seriously mentally ill as potential violence prevention strategies (25).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525086/
 
What does that have to do with anything? Alleged mental illness should not prevent deportation of an illegal migrant with a long criminal history.
 
Show me one time I said nations cannot commit war crimes.

You have said over and over they can't commit terrorism.

They can do both.

Any human can do both.

None are miraculously unable.

But when one nation not under attack attacks another with the goal of changing the government that is a massive act of terrorism, not a war crime.

Aggressive war IS terrorism. It is state terrorism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom