bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 40,430
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
If there's a way to get the swatter on a murder charge, do so. It should be a felony to make deliberate false report/accusation of a felony. The state isn't your proxy for carrying out vendettas; it needs to be punished severely.
Actually, the state IS your proxy for carrying out vendettas. That's how you persuade people to abandon vendettas in favour of civilization - you arrange for the state to do the punishing of offences on behalf of the victims, in an open, measured, and well thought through manner, so that all can see that justice was done. If you have a grievance against another citizen, you are supposed to make the state your proxy, by outlining the grievance to the police, who then decide what action, if any, to take; and/or by testifying in a court of law, which then makes a determination about who, if anyone, is in the wrong, and what form any compensation or punishment should take.
When the state stops being open, measured, and well thought through in its actions against suspected criminals, it is no longer fit for purpose. The job of the police is to bring suspects to trial with minimum force, and while it may, very occasionally, be necessary for them to use lethal force, this should not be routine.
As soon as it is considered reasonable, normal, or routine for police to employ lethal force, you have failed at your attempt to impose civilization. And at that point, vendettas such as these can once again take place - with the police as unwitting tools, making things worse, rather than better.
Every instance where a suspect is killed by police is an instance of justice being denied; Every such instance is BY DEFINITION an instance of the killing of an innocent person*, and should be treated as such.
In a civilized country, nobody would have been killed by police in this situation even if the reports made by Swautistic were not purely fictional.
Of course, none of that implies that Swautistic is not guilty of murder in this case, just as much as he would be had he hired an assassin. He took a course of action that he hoped, and had a reasonable expectation, would lead to somebody's death.
*All suspects, no matter how apparently obvious it is that they are guilty of a crime, are innocent, until and unless convicted in a court of law. A suspect killed by police is an innocent killed by police, under the definitions of these terms as used in law by civilized nations.