• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Gay Activist Dies By Suicide After LGBT Mob Hounds Him For Protesting Drag Queen Story Hour

Obviously there was much more going on in this guys head than bullying. He took his life less than 24 hours after the library protest took place.

Not to mention that he did exactly the same thing, bullying, to the drag queens that you complain about. Only he did it much more forcefully and scared and upset a bunch of kids in the process.

He did not bully anybody. He protested. He waited until the story time was over and he protested. Protesting isn't bullying, unless he was physically intimidating and violent, which he wasn't.

But the hundreds of messages on his social media dogpiling him and telling him he was a worthless piece of shit who should kill himself, THAT was bullying.

Some of the mob who bayed for his blood deleted their hatred after the fact of his suicide. Others doubled down and celebrated his death.

Obviously the only fair thing to do is to call in the Ultimate Arbiter of BOOO-lee-ying, Princess Malaria.

malaria.jpg

Another throwaway thread from the usual source...
 
It's very strange to me how drag queens claim they are men, but they just like dressing up as women. Then we have trans women who insist they are women because they like to dress up as women. Then we have trans women who dress up like men and still say they are women.

A lot of them claim they are breaking down gender norms, but is dressing like a stereotypical woman really breaking down gender norms? Sounds like it's enforcing the norms.

This stuff can hurt your brain trying to think about the inconsistency of it all.
Given how poorly you appear to think about these issues, I suggest you stop thinking about them to relieve your pain.

In my view the optics seem more like, "Half's making great points. Rather than think about them, I will ridicule him."

They do consistently ridicule and goad you (edited), and ignore the points you try to make, but that doesn't mean you made a good case or had good points. It just means they aren't addressing them.

I agree that bullying is wrong no matter what the ideology of the bully is. Yes, it can happen from the virtue signalling left, just as it so often happens from the virtue signalling right. Nobody has a monopoly on this shitty behaviour.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In my view the optics seem more like, "Half's making great points. Rather than think about them, I will ridicule him."

They do consistently ridicule and goad you (consistency edit), and ignore the points you try to make, but that doesn't mean you made a good case or had good points. It just means they aren't addressing them.

I agree that bullying is wrong no matter what the ideology of the bully is. Yes, it can happen from the virtue signalling left, just as it so often happens from the virtue signalling right. Nobody has a monopoly on this shitty behaviour.

The difference is that the left criticizes bullying when a person is targeted for being different, such as leading a group of hateful bigots to go yell at people in a library that they shouldn't be allowed to be around children because they don't dress according to gender norms. In contrast, the right criticizes "bullying" when those same bullying bigots trying to deny people their human rights are told what pieces of shit bigots they are for trying to harm other people for being different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom