• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Gaza isn't occupied

Loren Pechtel

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2000
Messages
51,540
Location
Nevada
Gender
Yes
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
You know why things really suck in Gaza? Rent to own cell phone contracts.
 
http://www.ejiltalk.org/european-court-decides-that-israel-is-not-occupying-gaza/

court said:
According to widespread expert opinion physical presence of foreign troops is a sine qua non requirement of occupation(2) , i.e. occupation is not conceivable without “boots on the ground” therefore forces exercising naval or air control through a naval or air blockade do not suffice(3) .

Now, can we have an end to the claims that it's occupied?

Okay, so now what?
 
Now, can we have an end to the claims that it's occupied?

Gaza isn't occupied in the same sense that a prison isn't occupied. The idea is to keep the inmates contained and control their resources, not to join them in there.
 
Who said anything about Gaza. The settlers aren't that dumb. Parts of Gaza used to be colonised. Israel moved out of Gaza (and the Sinai Peninsular) under a peace agreement with Egypt in 1979. Israel continues to build settlements in the West Bank. The Court of International Justice stated these are illegal (2004). Many Israelis believe these are illegal. Unfortunately the Settlers believe God to be an estate agent who gave them the land. Gaza is heavily blockaded instead. Israel blew its chance of peace by continuing its colonial policies to appease the extremists who hold the sway of power in its coalition governments. Such extremists played into the hands of Islamic extremists.

Think Gaza in the same way the Romans thought of Scotland. It was too troublesome to occupy so they built a wall around it.
 
Last edited:
This is a court ruling that didn't even look at the situation in Gaza.

This is merely wishful thinking on the part of apologists of Israeli brutality and oppression.
 
This is a court ruling that didn't even look at the situation in Gaza.

This is merely wishful thinking on the part of apologists of Israeli brutality and oppression.

This was the ruling against Israeli settlements. As I mentioned the Israelis pulled out its settlements from Gaza in 1979 so this would not be featured.
 
Now, can we have an end to the claims that it's occupied?

Gaza isn't occupied in the same sense that a prison isn't occupied. The idea is to keep the inmates contained and control their resources, not to join them in there.

QFT.

It is a distinction without a difference. It like the difference between whether there are guys permanently in your house threatening you with guns versus "merely" surrounding your house threatening you with guns, controlling every movement and kicking in the door and shooting people whenever it wants.
 
This is a court ruling that didn't even look at the situation in Gaza.

This is merely wishful thinking on the part of apologists of Israeli brutality and oppression.

This was the ruling against Israeli settlements. As I mentioned the Israelis pulled out its settlements from Gaza in 1979 so this would not be featured.

Israel has repeatedly launched massive military attacks of the people in Gaza.

Constantly sending in the military and killing people is no different from having the military in place.
 
This is a court ruling that didn't even look at the situation in Gaza.

This is merely wishful thinking on the part of apologists of Israeli brutality and oppression.

So? The key point is that you can't have an occupation without boots on the ground. No boots, no occupation.

- - - Updated - - -

This was the ruling against Israeli settlements. As I mentioned the Israelis pulled out its settlements from Gaza in 1979 so this would not be featured.

Israel has repeatedly launched massive military attacks of the people in Gaza.

Constantly sending in the military and killing people is no different from having the military in place.

Israel has repeatedly responded to attacks from Gaza.
 
Israel has repeatedly launched massive military attacks of the people in Gaza.

Constantly sending in the military and killing people is no different from having the military in place.

Israel has repeatedly responded to attacks from Gaza.

You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.
 
Interesting

http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Features/The-lost-Palestinian-Jews
According to amateur historian Tsvi Misinai, many Jews and Palestinians share not only DNA, but also customs and even names.

We are of the same race and blood, and cooperation will bring great prosperity to the land," wrote Emir Faisal to Felix Frankfurter in 1917. Faisal was known for his affinity to the Zionists who had begun streaming to the Holy Land; in 1919, he signed a cooperation agreement with Chaim Weizmann, to whom he wrote that he was "mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people." But Faisal's proclamations of kinship with the Jews were more than lip service to a commonly held belief, says Tsvi Misinai, who knows perhaps more about the origins of the modern Palestinians than anyone. "Faisal's paternal line was Hashemite," he says, "meaning he was directly descended from Muhammad. But the mother of his maternal grandfather, King On, was descended from a family of forced Jewish converts to Islam that immigrated to the east bank of the Jordan, later returning to one of the villages west of the Jordan
......

After years of research, Misinai says that he can declare with certainty that nearly 90 percent of all Palestinians are descended from the Jews. "And what's more, about half of them know it," he says. Not only that, many Palestinians retain Jewish customs, including mourning rituals, lighting Shabbat or memorial candles and even wearing tefillin
 
Israel has repeatedly responded to attacks from Gaza.

You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.

You're wrong. God told them it's okay. Anyway see my post above.

However if there was peace in the area, the Israelis would be an asset to the region for engineering, IT and a whole host of other things. In fact the cost of purchasing property would have been cheaper than going to war over it.
 
I'd go with the "prison" label rather than the "occupation" label.

Either way, there is a lot of suffering thereabouts.
 
So? The key point is that you can't have an occupation without boots on the ground. No boots, no occupation.

What is the point of this semantic game? Sure, its not an occupation and more of a concentration camp. Does that make it somehow less bad?

A lot of people on here keep referring to Gaza as occupied. I was proving they are wrong.
 
Israel has repeatedly responded to attacks from Gaza.

You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.

Hamas repeatedly has boots on the ground in Israel. Does that mean Hamas is occupying Israel also? And IDF is a resistance movement against said occupation?

Words have meanings. Twisting them to mean whatever supports your political opinion doesn't change what's actually happening.
 
You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.

Hamas repeatedly has boots on the ground in Israel. Does that mean Hamas is occupying Israel also? And IDF is a resistance movement against said occupation?

Words have meanings. Twisting them to mean whatever supports your political opinion doesn't change what's actually happening.

Jayjay: Tell me more about this Hamas occupation of Israel.:eating_popcorn: Let's see their checkpoints and night house searches...source please! When you isolate a population and control everything that happens to them you are occupying them. Israel is actually very much worse than occupying Gaza.
 
You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.

Hamas repeatedly has boots on the ground in Israel. Does that mean Hamas is occupying Israel also? And IDF is a resistance movement against said occupation?

Words have meanings. Twisting them to mean whatever supports your political opinion doesn't change what's actually happening.

Hamas is disputing land which the settlers are taking in the West Bank. Hamas is not taking Israeli land. So there is a difference. Hamas is not able to efficiently control the very militant groups who every so often fire rockets. As I understand it is in some kind of negotiations with Israel to extend the current truce, and Egypt will allow Palestinians to enter Egypt for 3 days from Gaza.

http://www.worldtribune.com/2015/06...-tensions-with-palestinian-authority-simmers/
 
You mean it has repeatedly responded to resistance of it's oppression.

Troops on the ground repeatedly.

An occupation.

Hamas repeatedly has boots on the ground in Israel. Does that mean Hamas is occupying Israel also? And IDF is a resistance movement against said occupation?

Words have meanings. Twisting them to mean whatever supports your political opinion doesn't change what's actually happening.

The actions of Hamas are reactions to decades of Israeli oppression and theft.

This doesn't mean that all actions of Hamas are justified only that they are the natural reaction to oppression.

You oppress long enough and something like Hamas is likely to arise.
 
Back
Top Bottom