No. Libertarians recognize the government as a legitimate mediator of disputes. It's anarchy that doesn't get it about the need for the rule of law.That's my point. Without a central government in power, warlords and gangs, or wealthy oligarchs, will take control. Communism and Libertarianism both assert, as you say, that only good comes from anarchy or a weak or non-existent stable government.
Some who call themselves libertarians do, but others don't. Next up: defining who is or is not a 'true' libertarian?No. Libertarians recognize the government as a legitimate mediator of disputes. It's anarchy that doesn't get it about the need for the rule of law.That's my point. Without a central government in power, warlords and gangs, or wealthy oligarchs, will take control. Communism and Libertarianism both assert, as you say, that only good comes from anarchy or a weak or non-existent stable government.
It seems to me a reasonable approximation of libertarianism has been tried and made to work, once, starting in 1882 when the prohibitions against women owning property in Britain were abolished and ending in 1916 when conscription was imposed. After the war ended the UK didn't go back to libertarianism because most people didn't like it.Libertarianism shares one aspect with communism in that it looks good on paper, but no one has ever managed to make it work. Libertarianism depends upon the majority of people having property and a common stake in the stability of the society.
Every system requires more than one thing. The problem with the modern version of libertarianism is it attracts people who have a basically selfish nature. Any system requires some degree of compromise and cooperation(why should I pay for schools when I don't have children?), something to which libertarians are generally adverse.Libertarianism would require that more than “most of the people” having property and a stake in the stability of the society. With a small fraction of violators, the whole thing crashes.
IOW it would require a change in basic human nature. A corrupt sociopath just got almost half the vote, QED
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "libertarian", here. What is it, and more importantly, why do you think it applies to Haiti? I doubt that most Haitians feel like their personal rights are being maximized by the system under which they currently live. Some of the lakous are effectively under control of vicious warlords who place extreme restrictions on work and movement. Other districts and the rural highlands are a bit less firmly controlled, but I've not heard of any regions practicing what I would recognize as a libertarian style of government. Have you?Doesn't the mere existence of the collapsed state of Haiti refute libertarianism, just in itself? Here we have a living example of what can happen to an area when all government fails.