• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Handgun, yes or no....?

Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

I noticed I countered your statement.
 
Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

I noticed I countered your statement.

Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?
 
Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?

5 will get you 10 that it will be some snide variation of, "I've already answered that but I won't say where - it's not my fault you can't read my riddles".
 
Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

I noticed I countered your statement.

Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?

Eh, I read Jason's question to refer to legal gun owners.
 
Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?

5 will get you 10 that it will be some snide variation of, "I've already answered that but I won't say where - it's not my fault you can't read my riddles".

You're mistaking the context. Easy to do, there are only a couple tricks I've seen that one do, but here I'm saying the bet for 10 is going to be "I am going to vigorously demand that you offer the proof because what you offered has nothing to do with proof for reasons I will not explain".

*You could probably blindly make that bet in any thread, though, and have even money, I'll grant. But these aren't hard cards to count.
 
Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?

Eh, I read Jason's question to refer to legal gun owners.

I read Jason's question the way Jason stated it.
 
So yes, that is how Zipr thinks gun owners behave. He found one example, and he had to go back three years and of course he had to accuse a minority, so that is how gun owners behave.

Take a sane citizen, put a gun into their hand, and that sane citizen suddenly becomes a slavering psychopath. Take that gun away, and that slavering psychopath suddenly becomes a sane citizen again.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.
 
Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

I noticed I countered your statement.

Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?
Never.
 
There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

Now here's a statement I would like to see answered: when was the last time Harvestdancer ever acknowledged that someone put up what they asked, and admitted they were wrong?

Never.

Ironically it was Jahryn who asked the question, when the last time I was berated for not answering a question it was because I asked Jahryn a question and didn't get any answer. As to be expected, laughing dog said I never do what I did one post above his.
 

Ironically it was Jahryn who asked the question, when the last time I was berated for not answering a question it was because I asked Jahryn a question and didn't get any answer. As to be expected, laughing dog said I never do what I did one post above his.

Well, I guess there's a first time for everything.
 
So yes, that is how Zipr thinks gun owners behave. He found one example, and he had to go back three years and of course he had to accuse a minority, so that is how gun owners behave.

Take a sane citizen, put a gun into their hand, and that sane citizen suddenly becomes a slavering psychopath. Take that gun away, and that slavering psychopath suddenly becomes a sane citizen again.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

I don't really care. You made a point. I refuted it with evidence.
 
So yes, that is how Zipr thinks gun owners behave. He found one example, and he had to go back three years and of course he had to accuse a minority, so that is how gun owners behave.

Take a sane citizen, put a gun into their hand, and that sane citizen suddenly becomes a slavering psychopath. Take that gun away, and that slavering psychopath suddenly becomes a sane citizen again.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

I don't really care. You made a point. I refuted it with evidence.

My point was "is this how Zipr thinks gun owners behave?", your refutation (sic) was "yes this singular incident does represent how Zipr thinks gun owners behave."

And of course you didn't answer my question about background checks and followup to the story. Time for everyone to blame me for not answering a question I asked you and you refused to answer.
 
So yes, that is how Zipr thinks gun owners behave. He found one example, and he had to go back three years and of course he had to accuse a minority, so that is how gun owners behave.

Take a sane citizen, put a gun into their hand, and that sane citizen suddenly becomes a slavering psychopath. Take that gun away, and that slavering psychopath suddenly becomes a sane citizen again.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

I don't really care. You made a point. I refuted it with evidence.

My point was "is this how Zipr thinks gun owners behave?", your refutation (sic) was "yes this singular incident does represent how Zipr thinks gun owners behave."

And of course you didn't answer my question about background checks and followup to the story. Time for everyone to blame me for not answering a question I asked you and you refused to answer.

Now you're misrepresenting what you said. Unsurprising.
 
Is that how you think gun owners behave?

Hm, that is what I wrote a few pages ago.

My point was "is this how Zipr thinks gun owners behave?", your refutation (sic) was "yes this singular incident does represent how Zipr thinks gun owners behave."

And of course you didn't answer my question about background checks and followup to the story. Time for everyone to blame me for not answering a question I asked you and you refused to answer.

Now you're misrepresenting what you said. Unsurprising.

What I wrote was:

Is that how you think gun owners behave?

Hm. It looks like I asked if that was how you think gun owners behave. Let's check again.

Is that how you think gun owners behave?

Yep. So of course you want to change what I asked. I fully expect someone to change that for me now.
 
Well, good. I have always felt I have a right, given to me by Jesus' pop, to carry a Glock into Chuck E. Cheese. Next time Dolli Dimples won't play the Muppets theme song, I'll bust a cap in her hippo ass.

Is that how you think gun owners behave?

Is that how you think gun owners behave?

Obviously some do.

[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/NxOMs5yEzTs[/YOUTUBE]

Poor Jason...
 
Poor Jason...

You ducked the question again. I suppose that's why you said "Poor Jason", because you know you don't answer questions.

I'm not sure what sort of point you think you made. You found a singular three year old data point to support your beliefs about gun owners in general. Congratulations. It is a good first step. Probably also your beliefs about minorities in general since the video featured a minority.

You're probably going to keep dodging instead of answering the question.

Then people will dog-pile me for not answering a question that I asked you.
 
Poor Jason...

You ducked the question again. I suppose that's why you said "Poor Jason", because you know you don't answer questions.

I'm not sure what sort of point you think you made. You found a singular three year old data point to support your beliefs about gun owners in general. Congratulations. It is a good first step. Probably also your beliefs about minorities in general since the video featured a minority.

You're probably going to keep dodging instead of answering the question.

Then people will dog-pile me for not answering a question that I asked you.

As I said, obviously some do. I didn't say anything about gun owners in general.
 
Poor Jason...

You ducked the question again. I suppose that's why you said "Poor Jason", because you know you don't answer questions.

I'm not sure what sort of point you think you made. You found a singular three year old data point to support your beliefs about gun owners in general. Congratulations. It is a good first step. Probably also your beliefs about minorities in general since the video featured a minority.

You're probably going to keep dodging instead of answering the question.

Then people will dog-pile me for not answering a question that I asked you.

As I said, obviously some do. I didn't say anything about gun owners in general.

You ducked the question again.

Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

Stop ducking the question. It is what you do all the time in every thread.

Also:
Me: Is this how gun owners behave?
You: This one did so yes.

There is a plural in what I wrote. Think about that.

Also, stop ducking my question.
 
As I said, obviously some do. I didn't say anything about gun owners in general.

You ducked the question again.

Fascinating. You had to go back three years to find an example. Do you have any follow up to that story? Did that guy pass the background check that has been in place in decades?

I notice you picked a black guy for your example.

There, I acknowledged Zipr's single data point. Now will he answer my question about if this guy passed his background check? What was the follow up to this story?

No, he won't answer, and he'll say his non-answer is me not answering. Again.

Stop ducking the question. It is what you do all the time in every thread.

Also:
Me: Is this how gun owners behave?
You: This one did so yes.

There is a plural in what I wrote. Think about that.

Also, stop ducking my question.

I have no interest in your question and I'm not required to answer any question. If you think there's more pertinent information in that story that relates to the thread, post it.

Personally, I just think you're projecting.
 
Back
Top Bottom