- Joined
- Apr 27, 2002
- Messages
- 174
Note: Before you respond to the incendiary thread title, I entreat you to understand what it is I am actually asserting. Peruse the ensuing exposition of my perspectives, & perh. you may discover a consonance with these sentiments within the recesses of your own cogitations.
Why Homosexuality Does Not Exist
It is incontrovertible that the attraction in question cannot be attributed to sexual desire, for it emerges prior to the development of such yearnings, often manifesting as early as the tender age of three. Thus I discern a fourfold nature underlying this phenomenon:
1.) A heightened sensitivity to æsthetic beauty, encompassing a superior awareness of beauty in forms other than the feminine.
This accounts for the disproportionate interest in the arts often exhibited by so-called homosexualists, who, on avg., possess a keener perception of beauty than the common observer. Experience with these individuals reinforces this notion, as ea. conforms to the stereotype witho. exception. In our hypersexualised society, it’ all too easy to categorise these sensations as sexual, when, in truth, they are sensual, æsthetic, & erotic in nature, but they are not sexual—as a matter of definition.†
2.) A potent longing for masculine love, frequently stemming from its paucity during the crucial years of psychological development.
This explains the intense love that these individuals feel for members of their own sex, as well as the desire to be loved in return. Owing to the intensity of the sentiment, & its intermixion with æsthetic perspicacity, it is frequently conflated with the equally intense feelings associated with ‘heterosexual’ love (—or rather, sexual love, for the term ‘heterosexual’ is pleonastic: as far as human beings are concerned, to say ‘sexual’ is to say ‘heterosexual.’ If it is not ‘hetero-,’ it is not biological sexuality.)
3.) Masturbatory conditioning, particularly during adolescence, engenders an association between sexually arousing stimuli, OTOH, & the dual desires for masculine love & the perception of objective beauty in the male figure, OTO.
It is evident how these factors may coalesce, culminating in a powerful impetus for conditioning in adolescence as well as mutual conditioning among young men. Hormonal influences unique to this period of life serve as additional motivators.
4.) The societally contrived nature of homosexualist identity as an artificial social construct that never existed until its pathologisation in the Victorian era.
The historical prerequisite for the formation of this identity was the Victorian era's denunciation of the condition as a psychosexual disease & its pathologisation as a psychological disorder by pseudoscientific charlatans. This very pathologisation laid the foundation for the emergence of this identity.
In lieu of engaging forthwith in the refutation of the anticipated counterarguments, a course to which my predisposition generally inclines, I shall, in consideration of the protracted nature of the present exposition, defer to the forthcoming responses of others to present the forementioned arguments, as I am sure they will.
1.) A heightened sensitivity to æsthetic beauty, encompassing a superior awareness of beauty in forms other than the feminine.
This accounts for the disproportionate interest in the arts often exhibited by so-called homosexualists, who, on avg., possess a keener perception of beauty than the common observer. Experience with these individuals reinforces this notion, as ea. conforms to the stereotype witho. exception. In our hypersexualised society, it’ all too easy to categorise these sensations as sexual, when, in truth, they are sensual, æsthetic, & erotic in nature, but they are not sexual—as a matter of definition.†
2.) A potent longing for masculine love, frequently stemming from its paucity during the crucial years of psychological development.
This explains the intense love that these individuals feel for members of their own sex, as well as the desire to be loved in return. Owing to the intensity of the sentiment, & its intermixion with æsthetic perspicacity, it is frequently conflated with the equally intense feelings associated with ‘heterosexual’ love (—or rather, sexual love, for the term ‘heterosexual’ is pleonastic: as far as human beings are concerned, to say ‘sexual’ is to say ‘heterosexual.’ If it is not ‘hetero-,’ it is not biological sexuality.)
3.) Masturbatory conditioning, particularly during adolescence, engenders an association between sexually arousing stimuli, OTOH, & the dual desires for masculine love & the perception of objective beauty in the male figure, OTO.
It is evident how these factors may coalesce, culminating in a powerful impetus for conditioning in adolescence as well as mutual conditioning among young men. Hormonal influences unique to this period of life serve as additional motivators.
4.) The societally contrived nature of homosexualist identity as an artificial social construct that never existed until its pathologisation in the Victorian era.
The historical prerequisite for the formation of this identity was the Victorian era's denunciation of the condition as a psychosexual disease & its pathologisation as a psychological disorder by pseudoscientific charlatans. This very pathologisation laid the foundation for the emergence of this identity.
In lieu of engaging forthwith in the refutation of the anticipated counterarguments, a course to which my predisposition generally inclines, I shall, in consideration of the protracted nature of the present exposition, defer to the forthcoming responses of others to present the forementioned arguments, as I am sure they will.
Last edited: