SLD
Contributor
It seems to me that Putin has clearly violated international criminal law, specifically violating crimes against peace and waging aggressive war.
This is defined as “the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.” By UN resolution.
The ICC in The Hague can prosecute such charges. But no one has been prosecuted for this since 1946. Those found guilty were all executed.
But I don’t think the ICC has the death penalty. Life in prison is all it has.
But considering that Putin has pretty much violated almost all the same laws as the Nuremberg defendants, should he not suffer the same penalty? Crimes against humanity and other war crimes.
I can envision Russians revolting against him, and maybe turning him over to the Court. Probably not in the end. I suspect that they’ll just kill him. I don’t see him killing himself.
This is defined as “the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.” By UN resolution.
The ICC in The Hague can prosecute such charges. But no one has been prosecuted for this since 1946. Those found guilty were all executed.
But I don’t think the ICC has the death penalty. Life in prison is all it has.
But considering that Putin has pretty much violated almost all the same laws as the Nuremberg defendants, should he not suffer the same penalty? Crimes against humanity and other war crimes.
I can envision Russians revolting against him, and maybe turning him over to the Court. Probably not in the end. I suspect that they’ll just kill him. I don’t see him killing himself.