fromderinside
Mazzie Daius
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 15,945
- Basic Beliefs
- optimist
*For entertainment purposes only.In fewer than three months Finland did the unthinkable, abandoning decades of military neutrality. The dramatic turnaround demonstrates how the Russian propaganda machine has turned out not to be a dangerous brown bear, but rather a squawking, ineffective lame duck.
This Russian failure tells us much about both the power and limits of digital disinformation - and how to combat it.
First, Russia’s information war targeted domestic audiences. Russian citizens live in their own Kremlin-controlled media bubble. It sells right-wing nationalist lies, drawing on a deep reservoir of historical memories about Western invasions and painting the Ukrainians as Nazis. Attempts to use these messages to influence foreign audiences lack credibility.
Finland is a particularly tough target for disinformation. We long have ranked near the top of most indexes, not just in education but also press freedom, gender equality, social trust - and happiness. It’s difficult to gain traction by painting our successful country as a failure.
History courses teach Finns how Russia fomented a civil war after the country’s 1917 declaration of independence or how Russia attacked us in 1939. More recently, we watched with dismay as Russia attempted to export misinformation about issues such as immigrants flooding into Finland, the European Union ripping off Finns to pay for profligate southern Europeans, and NATO acting as an aggressor rather than a defensive alliance. For almost all Finns, stories about Finnish authorities taking custody of children from Russian families in Finland ring false.
Second, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his government flooded the Internet with well-calculated messages that dominated Finland’s media space. Finns compared Zelensky’s straight talk with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s puffed-up lies. They listened to youngsters singing folk songs for peace. They read reports of Russian war crimes. They saw Ukrainian pictures of destroyed Russian tanks.
And third, just as important, Finland’s government began building strong information defenses. After Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, President Sauli Niinisto called on every Finn to take responsibility for the fight against false information. A year later, Finland brought in American experts to advise officials on how to recognize fake news.
The country’s education system, long ranked at the top of international comparisons, was reformed to emphasize media literacy. A Finnish fact-checking agency Faktabaari (FactBar) developed a much admired digital literacy “toolkit” for elementary to high school students.
After my former staffer at Finnish Broadcasting, Jessikka Aro, conducted an open-source investigation on Russia-linked disinformation campaigns, she became the target of a Russian smear campaign, accused of being everything from a CIA spy to a drug dealer. Two pro-Putin operatives were convicted of defamation.
We need now to go on the offensive. Western media have jump-started to offer high-quality neutral journalism and reporting in the Russian language. Examples of this are the Finnish and Estonian public service broadcasters and the leading dailies in Finland, Sweden, and Denmark. Their independent reporting is followed by many Russians and is causing cracks in the Kremlin facade. These reports are not propaganda. They are independent truth-telling operations.
As a NATO member Finns will continue to be pragmatic. We want to be a good neighbor to Russia. We will respect Russia as our neighbor. But it will take time. Trust in Russia will need a generation or two to be re-built.
The Finnish approach to both the physical and digital information threat is built on solid cornerstones: credible military capability and deep integration with the West. Our NATO membership train is on a fast track, and we expect a vigorous reaction from Russia. There could be an increase in military activity, cyber-attacks, and extensive propaganda warfare. But I’m not worried. We’re prepared.
I can't find any vote for Sweden.Opponents to the application included some lawmakers from the Left Alliance, part of Finland's five-party coalition, among them Markus Mustajarvi who challenged the decision with a counter proposal resulting in it being put to the vote.
"Our border would become the border between the military alliance and Russia. New tensions would not be a risk only during the application process but rather a new and permanent condition of our foreign and security policy," he said.
Early on Tuesday, the foreign affairs committee decided to join the state leadership in proposing to parliament that the Nordic country should apply for membership.
"Having heard a very large number of experts and having received the opinions of 10 (parliamentary) committees, the foreign affairs committee agrees with the government that Finland should apply for membership in NATO. This decision is unanimous," chairman Jussi Halla-aho told reporters.
No. Just showing your inconsistency in dealing with Ukrainian "nazis" and the Russian "nazis". I don't actually care that the Wagner group founder has SS tattoos, or that the Russian deputy prime minister had political rallies with swastika-carrying nationalist groups. What matters is the evil shit they have done, not their tattoos.Jayjay,
Whataboutism much?
Nobody is saying that. Azov's nazi and far-right connotations are well known and published in the media, nobody in the west thinks that it's not problematic. But it's a civilian problem, that every country has. In war time, what kind of politics or tattoos you have don't matter. Russia is the aggressor, and is committing horrendous atrocities in the territories it occupies. Anyone who fights them is doing a good deed. The regular Russian army on the other hand has committed far worse atrocities in Bucha and elsewhere, than the Azov in its entire existence.I only recognize Rogozin 20-25 years ago.
The rest is first, not known. Second, definitely not in any commanding position and I highly doubt are even in Donbas right now. Whereas your nazis were murdering russian and ukrainian population just a few weeks ago. Not to mention 8 years since 2014. And they ARE in commanding positions. They are 100% fucking nazis with swastika and Hitler tattoos and are in Ukrainan armed forces. Russian army does not have any of that shit. Moreover, unlike your governments Russian does not condone that shit. Yes, your governments literally say "nazis are good because they fight russians"
No, it's not. The openly nazi movement that brandishes swastikas and idolizes Hitler is fringe, but Russia is most certainly extremely nationalist, up to the highest level of government.Rogozin early on was a nationalist, so was........ Navalny. Now-days, as I explained to you before, nationalist movement is more fringe than in Finland.
So let's see... refugees from Ukraine who were forced intoSpeaking of nazis. Early in the conflict, russian refugees from ukrainian controlled Eastern Ukraine who ended up in Russia would often fight with refugees from DNR/LNR saying that Russia attacked them. After a while and a lot of new refugees from ukrainian controlled territories had came in, all these fights stopped, because newly arrived refugees explained to them in no uncertain terms that it is Ukrainian army who is bombing and murdering their own population. Nobody in Ukraine actually believes western propaganda garbage.
Not sure if they even had a vote? I think the process is different in Sweden, and doesn't require a vote in the parliament. Maybe @DrZoidberg can enlighten us.Finland's parliament votes yes to NATO | Reuters
Yes 188, no 8, absent(?) 3
I can't find any vote for Sweden.Opponents to the application included some lawmakers from the Left Alliance, part of Finland's five-party coalition, among them Markus Mustajarvi who challenged the decision with a counter proposal resulting in it being put to the vote.
"Our border would become the border between the military alliance and Russia. New tensions would not be a risk only during the application process but rather a new and permanent condition of our foreign and security policy," he said.
Early on Tuesday, the foreign affairs committee decided to join the state leadership in proposing to parliament that the Nordic country should apply for membership.
"Having heard a very large number of experts and having received the opinions of 10 (parliamentary) committees, the foreign affairs committee agrees with the government that Finland should apply for membership in NATO. This decision is unanimous," chairman Jussi Halla-aho told reporters.
Not sure if they even had a vote? I think the process is different in Sweden, and doesn't require a vote in the parliament. Maybe @DrZoidberg can enlighten us.Finland's parliament votes yes to NATO | Reuters
Yes 188, no 8, absent(?) 3
I can't find any vote for Sweden.Opponents to the application included some lawmakers from the Left Alliance, part of Finland's five-party coalition, among them Markus Mustajarvi who challenged the decision with a counter proposal resulting in it being put to the vote.
"Our border would become the border between the military alliance and Russia. New tensions would not be a risk only during the application process but rather a new and permanent condition of our foreign and security policy," he said.
Early on Tuesday, the foreign affairs committee decided to join the state leadership in proposing to parliament that the Nordic country should apply for membership.
"Having heard a very large number of experts and having received the opinions of 10 (parliamentary) committees, the foreign affairs committee agrees with the government that Finland should apply for membership in NATO. This decision is unanimous," chairman Jussi Halla-aho told reporters.
Speaking of nazis. Early in the conflict, russian refugees from ukrainian controlled Eastern Ukraine who ended up in Russia would often fight with refugees from DNR/LNR saying that Russia attacked them. After a while and a lot of new refugees from ukrainian controlled territories had came in, all these fights stopped, because newly arrived refugees explained to them in no uncertain terms that it is Ukrainian army who is bombing and murdering their own population. Nobody in Ukraine actually believes western propaganda garbage.
The next guy is likely to be worse.Putler is dying of cancer. I assume that once he's dead, that Russian military will return home (hopefully take all the Russian dead soldiers with you also).
Maybe. But he'll have far less resources to play with. Far less weapons. He'll have far less allies. And he'll have a country heading into bankruptcy. Eventually no one will want the products that Russia can sell (gas and oil). And he'll have enemies in Ukraine that Russia created rebuilding and with a hate for Russia that will last generations. I don't think that the future bodes well for Russia.The next guy is likely to be worse.Putler is dying of cancer. I assume that once he's dead, that Russian military will return home (hopefully take all the Russian dead soldiers with you also).
By coincidence, I just listened to a reporter interviewing a Russian speaking Estonian woman who parroted exactly what Barbos said above. That Ukraine is bombing itself. We are arming Ukraine with the weapons that Ukraine is using to destroy their own cities. Unbelievable. And she has access to western media. In fact, Russian TV is currently banned in Estonia. The interview was on a BBC podcast, "The documentary" dated May 18. Putler has created a sick demented cult in Russia in which it appears, that people will believe in despite common logic and facts. To have a large powerful country with people who are so deluded is truly scary. The west is going to be at war with Russia for a long time....No. Just showing your inconsistency in dealing with Ukrainian "nazis" and the Russian "nazis". I don't actually care that the Wagner group founder has SS tattoos, or that the Russian deputy prime minister had political rallies with swastika-carrying nationalist groups. What matters is the evil shit they have done, not their tattoos.Jayjay,
Whataboutism much?
Nobody is saying that. Azov's nazi and far-right connotations are well known and published in the media, nobody in the west thinks that it's not problematic. But it's a civilian problem, that every country has. In war time, what kind of politics or tattoos you have don't matter. Russia is the aggressor, and is committing horrendous atrocities in the territories it occupies. Anyone who fights them is doing a good deed. The regular Russian army on the other hand has committed far worse atrocities in Bucha and elsewhere, than the Azov in its entire existence.I only recognize Rogozin 20-25 years ago.
The rest is first, not known. Second, definitely not in any commanding position and I highly doubt are even in Donbas right now. Whereas your nazis were murdering russian and ukrainian population just a few weeks ago. Not to mention 8 years since 2014. And they ARE in commanding positions. They are 100% fucking nazis with swastika and Hitler tattoos and are in Ukrainan armed forces. Russian army does not have any of that shit. Moreover, unlike your governments Russian does not condone that shit. Yes, your governments literally say "nazis are good because they fight russians"
No, it's not. The openly nazi movement that brandishes swastikas and idolizes Hitler is fringe, but Russia is most certainly extremely nationalist, up to the highest level of government.Rogozin early on was a nationalist, so was........ Navalny. Now-days, as I explained to you before, nationalist movement is more fringe than in Finland.
So let's see... refugees from Ukraine who were forced intoSpeaking of nazis. Early in the conflict, russian refugees from ukrainian controlled Eastern Ukraine who ended up in Russia would often fight with refugees from DNR/LNR saying that Russia attacked them. After a while and a lot of new refugees from ukrainian controlled territories had came in, all these fights stopped, because newly arrived refugees explained to them in no uncertain terms that it is Ukrainian army who is bombing and murdering their own population. Nobody in Ukraine actually believes western propaganda garbage.concentrationfiltration camps were told "in no uncertain terms" by their captors that they should not blame Russia for bombing them, and they magically changed their opinion and saw the light!
You do realize what that sounds like?
You're probably correct. If the Russians were really smart, they'd help the west in sending more weapons to Ukraine so that the Ukrainians could further hammer Odsea.While @barbos has rendered himself NWRT, it is interesting that they let him show back up here.
I wonder if he still thinks Russia won’t invade Ukraine. I see they’re now saying they don’t want Odesa, so that’s probably the next target.
… unless Trump manages to cheat his way back into power. Putler is probably hoping to hang on by his fingernails until that happens. If/when it does, Russia will become the good guy, while the Ukranian and American public will be the villains, along with the people of any remaining democracy. NATO will be gone, the EU will fragment and the Global Dictator Community will rejoice.The west is going to be at war with Russia for a long time....
… unless Trump manages to cheat his way back into power. Putler is probably hoping to hang on by his fingernails until that happens. If/when it does, Russia will become the good guy, while the Ukranian and American public will be the villains, along with the people of any remaining democracy. NATO will be gone, the EU will fragment and the Global Dictator Community will rejoice.The west is going to be at war with Russia for a long time....
I wonder if Barbos is literally working for the Russian propaganda departement. It would explain his continual support for Russia
Why do you think that? I'm not seeing evidence that his views are in the minority. I hear interview after interview of Russians (some in eastern Europe) agreeing that the Ukrainians are attacking themselves. The BBC interviews are very interesting. I think that it's a mistake to make many assumptions of what the Russian people believe. We don't have any honest way to gauge their majority opinion. However, to assume that the Russian people all want peace, and that the war will crumble after the Putler government collapses, is dangerous. It creates complacency. I think that there's a very good chance that a majority of Russians want to restore Mother Russia through war. And the west should prepare for the worst. Very much hope that I'm wrong by the way.....I wonder if Barbos is literally working for the Russian propaganda departement. It would explain his continual support for Russia
Russia is currently a Stalinist state. For me that explains everything. There were thousands of protestors arrested across Russia when Ukraine was invaded. They were treated as criminals and threatened with long prison sentences. What else should we expect from the Russian population given such authoritarian methods? There are plenty of kooks in this country and we're a functioning democracy.By coincidence, I just listened to a reporter interviewing a Russian speaking Estonian woman who parroted exactly what Barbos said above. That Ukraine is bombing itself. We are arming Ukraine with the weapons that Ukraine is using to destroy their own cities. Unbelievable. And she has access to western media. In fact, Russian TV is currently banned in Estonia. The interview was on a BBC podcast, "The documentary" dated May 18. Putler has created a sick demented cult in Russia in which it appears, that people will believe in despite common logic and facts. To have a large powerful country with people who are so deluded is truly scary. The west is going to be at war with Russia for a long time....