Not talking of the Government of India policy for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but I hold NATO's expansion policy to be equally responsible for initiating and prolonging it.
NATO expansion policy is a country may join or leave as it sees fit to do. NATO is a threat to Russia only in as much as countries Russia would take by some means of force are welcome. That is the crux of it.
I did, in my post https://iidb.org/threads/how-should...vasion-of-ukraine.25317/page-785#post-1197836
True. Ukraine should think of dissociating with it. The arms aid is not going to end the war. I do not see peace between Ukraine and Russia on the horizon.
Arms to Ukraine won't stop the war. But they do lead to fewer Ukrainians being killed and less land stolen. Do you not see this? When arms are slowed down to Ukraine, their soldiers can't fight off the invading Russians. Less arms to Ukraine leads to more Ukrainians killed; Putler to become more aggressive. The only way to stop this war is to stop the invaders from moving forward. Russia has stated their terms over and over: complete surrender.True. Ukraine should think of dissociating with it. The arms aid is not going to end the war. I do not see peace between Ukraine and Russia on the horizon.
Looking for a nuclear war?
I do not know about them. I have read that Trump is friendly with Putin, Xi and Kim Jong.
Just like NATO, China is playing a similar game, helping Russia to fight in Ukraine.
That will be surrender of the territory currently occupied by Russia. Is that any different from surrender?
www.kyivpost.com
Well, it's not their land!! However, are you trying to say that they only way for Russia to keep the land that they've stolen is to continue to push forward and steal more land? I actually think that Ukraine might be forced into some kind of plan to trade land for peace. I don't think that they'll be able to push Russia out of the land its stolen. But this should be decided by Ukraine. And there can be no chance of this unless there is a peace that can be offered to Ukraine! No reasonable person would trust Russia. The only way for a long-term peace to come to the region is for a strong Ukraine with substantial arms that can defend itself against a very large bully country on it's border. If you disagree, just reduce Indian defenses on your border with Pakistan; what do you think would happen?
Putin has stated for years that Ukraine is part of Russia. There is no way for Ukraine to avoid delusional thinking by a demented autocrat.
So, the only way for Ukraine is to surrender the occupied territory. Then what for they are fighting all along for? NATO?
Think whatever you want of Putin. It matters little.
True of everything in this thread. At least my thoughts are tethered to reality.
Yeah, that is my reading of the conflict. Perhaps Russia did not want Ukraine to bend, but just be aware of its susceptibilities. They could have elected a moderate President in place of Yanukovich or Poroshenko.
Reality is difficult to understand with prejudices which exist.
The only ones who deserves arrest warrants are KyivPost scumbags who came out with this laughable garbage.Hopefully they will be able to identify all those who deserve arrest warrants.Russian Pilot Betrays Colleagues Who Attacked Ohmatdyt Children’s Hospital in Kyiv
The pilot forwarded documents to Ukraine related to the activities of his military unit as well as private photos of the command staff of the 22nd Heavy Bombing Aviation Division, HUR said.
As your posts assuredly demonstrate.
Looks like they vastly overestimated that susceptibility, as we head toward year four of their three day “military exercise”/invasion. And they’re STILL nowhere near Kyiv.
