• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How to reduce teen pregnancy

Loren Pechtel

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2000
Messages
51,588
Location
Nevada
Gender
Yes
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/s...-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html?_r=0

Provide free long-acting contraception. 40% drop.

Of course that leaves the fundies without a bunch of bad girls to hold up as examples, it's not going to get funded even though it's a no-brainer from the financial standpoint. (It's a hell of a lot cheaper than welfare.)

Is it cheaper than religious war? Baptists rise up and erase that traitor and baby killer Loren Pechtel.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/s...-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html?_r=0

Provide free long-acting contraception. 40% drop.

Of course that leaves the fundies without a bunch of bad girls to hold up as examples, it's not going to get funded even though it's a no-brainer from the financial standpoint. (It's a hell of a lot cheaper than welfare.)

Not too many people take risks and play Russian Roulette with a loaded gun, but we look on sex in a different way. Whilst these contraceptives are more efficient at preventing babies, there is still the risk of sexually transmitted disease. Once a woman consents to sex in a relationship, they have a greater emotional involvement, when these relationships break down, people are often left emotionally scarred.

Whilst I agree with you, that it is good to reduce unwanted pregnancies, I also believe it is better for a women to consent to sex only when there is consent for a long term relationship, preferably marriage.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/s...-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html?_r=0

Provide free long-acting contraception. 40% drop.

Of course that leaves the fundies without a bunch of bad girls to hold up as examples, it's not going to get funded even though it's a no-brainer from the financial standpoint. (It's a hell of a lot cheaper than welfare.)

Not too many people take risks and play Russian Roulette with a loaded gun, but we look on sex in a different way. Whilst these contraceptives are more efficient at preventing babies, there is still the risk of sexually transmitted disease. Once a woman consents to sex in a relationship, they have a greater emotional involvement, when these relationships break down, people are often left emotionally scarred.

Whilst I agree with you, that it is good to reduce unwanted pregnancies, I also believe it is better for a women to consent to sex only when there is consent for a long term relationship, preferably marriage.
We aren't talking about women, we are talking about teenagers.
 
Not too many people take risks and play Russian Roulette with a loaded gun, but we look on sex in a different way. Whilst these contraceptives are more efficient at preventing babies, there is still the risk of sexually transmitted disease. Once a woman consents to sex in a relationship, they have a greater emotional involvement, when these relationships break down, people are often left emotionally scarred.

Whilst I agree with you, that it is good to reduce unwanted pregnancies, I also believe it is better for a women to consent to sex only when there is consent for a long term relationship, preferably marriage.
We aren't talking about women, we are talking about teenagers.
also we're talking about the real world, not whatever deluded fantasy eric is living in if he thinks that load of bullshit he posted even remotely resembles anything in reality for most people.
 
I am always thrilled whenever men try to solve the issue of young girls and women and unwanted pregnancy by suggesting something girls and women need to do to reduce the inconvenience of unintended early pregnancies which has the added benefit of requiring zero effort or thought or inconvenience for men and leaves the girls and women available for sex with men. Especially when the same men also argue against free birth control for women.


Two things that also work or have the potential to work:

1. Help girls envision a future fore themselves that includes education and economic security.
2. Develope long acting birth control for males, and make it readily available.

Birth control for either or both genders does not eliminate the risk of STDs nor does it mitigate the negative consequences of early sexual involvement.
 
I am helping to reduce teen pregnancy by: 1) not fucking teens and 2) having a vasectomy just in case.
 
I am helping to reduce teen pregnancy by: 1) not fucking teens and 2) having a vasectomy just in case.
and if you were a teenager, that might mean... anything. but you're not, so congratulations on contributing nothing to the solution.

IMO, mandatory vasectomies for all males in their early-mid teens would be the way to go.
getting one was just about the greatest and most liberating thing i've ever done in my life, and it would pretty much solve 99.9% of the unwanted pregnancy problem: you can't forget to take your vasectomy that day, you don't have to put it on for it to be effective, and it works even if you're raping somebody!
 
Written in paint marker on a condom machine in a bathroom I saw once: "Use of these will solve almost all the world's problems".


img03.jpg
 
We aren't talking about women, we are talking about teenagers.
also we're talking about the real world, not whatever deluded fantasy eric is living in if he thinks that load of bullshit he posted even remotely resembles anything in reality for most people.

Ahh... That pesky reality rears its ugly head once again.
 
I am helping to reduce teen pregnancy by: 1) not fucking teens and 2) having a vasectomy just in case.
and if you were a teenager, that might mean... anything. but you're not, so congratulations on contributing nothing to the solution.
ksen was being sarcastic.

IMO, mandatory vasectomies for all males in their early-mid teens would be the way to go.
getting one was just about the greatest and most liberating thing i've ever done in my life, and it would pretty much solve 99.9% of the unwanted pregnancy problem: you can't forget to take your vasectomy that day, you don't have to put it on for it to be effective, and it works even if you're raping somebody!
Getting a vasectomy however reduces the glorious opportunity to accidentally get the wife pregnant at 38 when your kids are in high school.

The solution to this problem is simple, "less government".
 
and if you were a teenager, that might mean... anything. but you're not, so congratulations on contributing nothing to the solution.
ksen was being sarcastic.

IMO, mandatory vasectomies for all males in their early-mid teens would be the way to go.
getting one was just about the greatest and most liberating thing i've ever done in my life, and it would pretty much solve 99.9% of the unwanted pregnancy problem: you can't forget to take your vasectomy that day, you don't have to put it on for it to be effective, and it works even if you're raping somebody!
Getting a vasectomy however reduces the glorious opportunity to accidentally get the wife pregnant at 38 when your kids are in high school.

The solution to this problem is simple, "less government".

Well, it certainly isn't 'stop fucking teenagers.'
 
Well, it certainly isn't 'stop fucking teenagers.'

As a 40-something year old man I probably shouldn't be fucking teenagers anyway . . . or should I? :hmmm:

As long as they're 18 years and 1 day old, you're fine. If they're 17 years, 11 months and 29 days old then you're a fucking monster and we'll need to burn you alive. :mad:
 
and if you were a teenager, that might mean... anything. but you're not, so congratulations on contributing nothing to the solution.
ksen was being sarcastic.

IMO, mandatory vasectomies for all males in their early-mid teens would be the way to go.
getting one was just about the greatest and most liberating thing i've ever done in my life, and it would pretty much solve 99.9% of the unwanted pregnancy problem: you can't forget to take your vasectomy that day, you don't have to put it on for it to be effective, and it works even if you're raping somebody!
Getting a vasectomy however reduces the glorious opportunity to accidentally get the wife pregnant at 38 when your kids are in high school.
The solution to this problem is simple, "less government."

Do you mean less law and order? I really think our government needs to redefine itself...and become a champion of human rights instead of this terribly dependent and demanding thing it has become at the bidding of outfits like Monsanto and Chevron and Boeing. We have to acknowledge that the sex practices of a great many people are not aligned with Biblical notions of marriage and godliness. We need to assure that their ACTUAL PRACTICES are as safe as possible and produce as few unintended consequences as possible. We should not allow government the power to dictate to people they have to marry or not marry. Proper education is really at the bottom of this problem....people need to be informed in order to protect themselves from life events completely beyond their control. Things like unwanted pregnancy in a land where abortion is illegal. Things like AIDS. A truly humanistic government would concern itself with these issues and stop focusing on personal preferences of individuals. So I say Yeah! Less government and More government at the same time!:thinking:
 
As a 40-something year old man I probably shouldn't be fucking teenagers anyway . . . or should I? :hmmm:

As long as they're 18 years and 1 day old, you're fine. If they're 17 years, 11 months and 29 days old then you're a fucking monster and we'll need to burn you alive. :mad:

Is that the OFFICIAL CANADIAN POSITION?
 
As long as they're 18 years and 1 day old, you're fine. If they're 17 years, 11 months and 29 days old then you're a fucking monster and we'll need to burn you alive. :mad:

Is that the OFFICIAL CANADIAN POSITION?

Yes. We'll politely set you on fire and apologize profusely for the inconvenience while we're doing it but we will burn you.
 
Back
Top Bottom