• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Hurricane Breonna

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Jan 31, 2001
Messages
50,630
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
So we await the findings from the Republican Attorney General on charges regarding the killing of a US civilian by law officers who fucked up, wait no... who "choked" when executing a no-knock narcotics warrant.

Luckily, thanks to being in the 21st century, there is no body cam footage of the events to help to provide possibly definitive evidence to support the claims of the officers.

The police... well, they are going to support the police.
article said:
"This man violently attacked our officers, and was charged with attempted murder after shooting a sergeant!" The union wrote in a Facebook post March 27, two weeks after the incident. "Not only is he a threat to the men and women of law enforcement, but he also poses a significant danger to the community we protect!"
The police? Well, they are definitely benefiting from lying if things went down poorly. And the trouble is, we have no mechanisms to be able to trust anyone in this case. The Police don't police the Police. And generally, police officers have to act so egregiously wrongly in the field to ever get fired (and rarely held accountible).

No drugs were found at the apartment and questions about packages being received there were already addressed. It seems like waiting to check a package being sent to her place for Glover could have resolved whether drugs were going to that apartment.

It is a tough job, and the situation likely was intense, but without an actual mechanism to hold officers responsible for poor decisions within the existing systems of internal Police oversight and the criminal justice system, the issue of justice will never seem to be fulfilled. And we await a bunch of frustration to be exerted as no one in the apartment had drug related issues or charges, but a high risk no-knock warrant was given anyway, and that created the chaos necessary to get people shot and/or killed. There seems to be so much wrong with this case that I can understand the frustration of people who might act as if they perceive their lives simply don't matter to change any of it.
 
So we await the findings from the Republican Attorney General on charges regarding the killing of a US civilian by law officers who fucked up, wait no... who "choked" when executing a no-knock narcotics warrant.

Luckily, thanks to being in the 21st century, there is no body cam footage of the events to help to provide possibly definitive evidence to support the claims of the officers.

The police... well, they are going to support the police.
article said:
"This man violently attacked our officers, and was charged with attempted murder after shooting a sergeant!" The union wrote in a Facebook post March 27, two weeks after the incident. "Not only is he a threat to the men and women of law enforcement, but he also poses a significant danger to the community we protect!"
The police? Well, they are definitely benefiting from lying if things went down poorly. And the trouble is, we have no mechanisms to be able to trust anyone in this case. The Police don't police the Police. And generally, police officers have to act so egregiously wrongly in the field to ever get fired (and rarely held accountible).

No drugs were found at the apartment and questions about packages being received there were already addressed. It seems like waiting to check a package being sent to her place for Glover could have resolved whether drugs were going to that apartment.

It is a tough job, and the situation likely was intense, but without an actual mechanism to hold officers responsible for poor decisions within the existing systems of internal Police oversight and the criminal justice system, the issue of justice will never seem to be fulfilled. And we await a bunch of frustration to be exerted as no one in the apartment had drug related issues or charges, but a high risk no-knock warrant was given anyway, and that created the chaos necessary to get people shot and/or killed. There seems to be so much wrong with this case that I can understand the frustration of people who might act as if they perceive their lives simply don't matter to change any of it.

I am inclined to assign a great deal of responsibility for whoever was responsible for dispatching the police officers to that address on a knockless warrant in the first place. If one takes at face value that the officers were told that this was a drug house, they would naturally expect bad guys behind the door so when they were fired upon (by someone who thought their home was being invaded by criminals), one can understand how shots were fired. I don't let them off the hook completely but the real responsibility lays with whoever was responsible for sending them there--and whoever provided misinformation that led them to believe that they were going to be apprehending drug drug dealers who would likely be armed. That is where the case gets interesting.
 
So we await the findings from the Republican Attorney General on charges regarding the killing of a US civilian by law officers who fucked up, wait no... who "choked" when executing a no-knock narcotics warrant.

Luckily, thanks to being in the 21st century, there is no body cam footage of the events to help to provide possibly definitive evidence to support the claims of the officers.

The police... well, they are going to support the police.
article said:
"This man violently attacked our officers, and was charged with attempted murder after shooting a sergeant!" The union wrote in a Facebook post March 27, two weeks after the incident. "Not only is he a threat to the men and women of law enforcement, but he also poses a significant danger to the community we protect!"
The police? Well, they are definitely benefiting from lying if things went down poorly. And the trouble is, we have no mechanisms to be able to trust anyone in this case. The Police don't police the Police. And generally, police officers have to act so egregiously wrongly in the field to ever get fired (and rarely held accountible).

No drugs were found at the apartment and questions about packages being received there were already addressed. It seems like waiting to check a package being sent to her place for Glover could have resolved whether drugs were going to that apartment.

It is a tough job, and the situation likely was intense, but without an actual mechanism to hold officers responsible for poor decisions within the existing systems of internal Police oversight and the criminal justice system, the issue of justice will never seem to be fulfilled. And we await a bunch of frustration to be exerted as no one in the apartment had drug related issues or charges, but a high risk no-knock warrant was given anyway, and that created the chaos necessary to get people shot and/or killed. There seems to be so much wrong with this case that I can understand the frustration of people who might act as if they perceive their lives simply don't matter to change any of it.

I am inclined to assign a great deal of responsibility for whoever was responsible for dispatching the police officers to that address on a knockless warrant in the first place. If one takes at face value that the officers were told that this was a drug house, they would naturally expect bad guys behind the door so when they were fired upon (by someone who thought their home was being invaded by criminals), one can understand how shots were fired. I don't let them off the hook completely but the real responsibility lays with whoever was responsible for sending them there--and whoever provided misinformation that led them to believe that they were going to be apprehending drug drug dealers who would likely be armed. That is where the case gets interesting.

No body cams recording their announcement that they were police?? Hmmm.
 
I am inclined to assign a great deal of responsibility for whoever was responsible for dispatching the police officers to that address on a knockless warrant in the first place. If one takes at face value that the officers were told that this was a drug house, they would naturally expect bad guys behind the door so when they were fired upon (by someone who thought their home was being invaded by criminals), one can understand how shots were fired. I don't let them off the hook completely but the real responsibility lays with whoever was responsible for sending them there--and whoever provided misinformation that led them to believe that they were going to be apprehending drug drug dealers who would likely be armed. That is where the case gets interesting.
From what I've read, a drug dealer who was in a relationship at one time with Breonna had packages sent there. The claim was it was legit stuff that Glover was afraid would be stolen by others. This claim seems pretty to test! And the police even looked into the package thing and came up with nothing. Add that no one in that apartment had any connection with drugs and we are left with a warrant with virtually no viable basis for existing, forget a no-knock warrant.
 
One officer indicted for wanton violence. Nothing for the other two.
 
Does anyone know the answer to the following questions, because I could not find the answers to them.

1) The police opened fire on the boyfriend. Was the boyfriend actually injured by the police? If not, those officers are incompetent.

2) Related to the 1st question is, did the bullets that injured or killed Ms Taylor pass through the boyfriend or a wall? If not, those officers are really incompetent.

At some point, proficiency and technical competency should be expected on the part of all professionals, including police officers. Hitting your target is your responsibility. Letting officers off because of their incompetency provides little incentive for competency and proficiency.
 
Does anyone know the answer to the following questions, because I could not find the answers to them.

1) The police opened fire on the boyfriend. Was the boyfriend actually injured by the police? If not, those officers are incompetent.

2) Related to the 1st question is, did the bullets that injured or killed Ms Taylor pass through the boyfriend or a wall? If not, those officers are really incompetent.

At some point, proficiency and technical competency should be expected on the part of all professionals, including police officers. Hitting your target is your responsibility. Letting officers off because of their incompetency provides little incentive for competency and proficiency.
I don't have the answers directly, but based on the charge of wanton violence, the answer would seem to indicate that the Grand Jury agrees, gross incompetence.
 
It appears the Committee to Re-Elect the President has an event in Louisville. Smashing good time.
 
I am inclined to assign a great deal of responsibility for whoever was responsible for dispatching the police officers to that address on a knockless warrant in the first place. If one takes at face value that the officers were told that this was a drug house, they would naturally expect bad guys behind the door so when they were fired upon (by someone who thought their home was being invaded by criminals), one can understand how shots were fired. I don't let them off the hook completely but the real responsibility lays with whoever was responsible for sending them there--and whoever provided misinformation that led them to believe that they were going to be apprehending drug drug dealers who would likely be armed. That is where the case gets interesting.
From what I've read, a drug dealer who was in a relationship at one time with Breonna had packages sent there. The claim was it was legit stuff that Glover was afraid would be stolen by others. This claim seems pretty to test! And the police even looked into the package thing and came up with nothing. Add that no one in that apartment had any connection with drugs and we are left with a warrant with virtually no viable basis for existing, forget a no-knock warrant.

Add that no one in that apartment had any connection with drugs and we are left with a warrant with virtually no viable basis for existing

If you’ve not read the search warrant, then how could possibly know what you’ve alleged to be accurate?

A search warrant may still have probable cause despite false information in the warrant, where probable cause still exists elsewhere in the warrant.
In addition, erroneous or mistaken information is not necessarily fatal, so long as probable cause is established by the other information in the search warrant.


https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Breonna-Taylor-search-warrants.pdf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Does anyone know the answer to the following questions, because I could not find the answers to them.

1) The police opened fire on the boyfriend. Was the boyfriend actually injured by the police? If not, those officers are incompetent.

2) Related to the 1st question is, did the bullets that injured or killed Ms Taylor pass through the boyfriend or a wall? If not, those officers are really incompetent.

At some point, proficiency and technical competency should be expected on the part of all professionals, including police officers. Hitting your target is your responsibility. Letting officers off because of their incompetency provides little incentive for competency and proficiency.
I don't have the answers directly, but based on the charge of wanton violence, the answer would seem to indicate that the Grand Jury agrees, gross incompetence.
Well, the drywall got some justice, I guess.
 
So we await the findings from the Republican Attorney General on charges regarding the killing of a US civilian by law officers who fucked up, wait no... who "choked" when executing a no-knock narcotics warrant.

Luckily, thanks to being in the 21st century, there is no body cam footage of the events to help to provide possibly definitive evidence to support the claims of the officers.

The police... well, they are going to support the police.
article said:
"This man violently attacked our officers, and was charged with attempted murder after shooting a sergeant!" The union wrote in a Facebook post March 27, two weeks after the incident. "Not only is he a threat to the men and women of law enforcement, but he also poses a significant danger to the community we protect!"
The police? Well, they are definitely benefiting from lying if things went down poorly. And the trouble is, we have no mechanisms to be able to trust anyone in this case. The Police don't police the Police. And generally, police officers have to act so egregiously wrongly in the field to ever get fired (and rarely held accountible).

No drugs were found at the apartment and questions about packages being received there were already addressed. It seems like waiting to check a package being sent to her place for Glover could have resolved whether drugs were going to that apartment.

It is a tough job, and the situation likely was intense, but without an actual mechanism to hold officers responsible for poor decisions within the existing systems of internal Police oversight and the criminal justice system, the issue of justice will never seem to be fulfilled. And we await a bunch of frustration to be exerted as no one in the apartment had drug related issues or charges, but a high risk no-knock warrant was given anyway, and that created the chaos necessary to get people shot and/or killed. There seems to be so much wrong with this case that I can understand the frustration of people who might act as if they perceive their lives simply don't matter to change any of it.

I am inclined to assign a great deal of responsibility for whoever was responsible for dispatching the police officers to that address on a knockless warrant in the first place. If one takes at face value that the officers were told that this was a drug house, they would naturally expect bad guys behind the door so when they were fired upon (by someone who thought their home was being invaded by criminals), one can understand how shots were fired. I don't let them off the hook completely but the real responsibility lays with whoever was responsible for sending them there--and whoever provided misinformation that led them to believe that they were going to be apprehending drug drug dealers who would likely be armed. That is where the case gets interesting.
I essentially share your assessment.

From what I can gather, Kenneth Walker actually thought that it was the the ex-boyfriend, Glover, who was entering the house.
 
Two police officers were shot during "peaceful protests" in Louisville.

Arrest citation details charges against Larynzo Johnson, suspect accused in LMPD shooting
Courier Journal said:
Louisville Metro Police Department officials have identified the man in custody who they say shot and injured two officers Wednesday night amid protests across the city.

Larynzo Johnson, 26, was arrested at 8:40 p.m., according to his citation, which stated he would face multiple charges of first-degree assault of a police officer and first-degree wanton endangerment. LMPD interim Chief Ronert Schroeder said Thursday that the suspect will be charged with two counts of assault and 14 counts of wanton endangerment, "all directed against police officers."
Assault? Why not attempted murder?

Anyway, this is the guy.
larynzo-johnson-mug-lmdc.jpg

As you can see, it's obviously a white supremacist Proud Boi just trying to make #BLM look bad. :rolleyes:
 
Well, the drywall got some justice, I guess.
I don't think one can really fault the police officers for returning fire when they found themselves getting shot at by Breanna's boyfriend. One of the officers was even wounded in the leg.
 
Well, the drywall got some justice, I guess.
I don't think one can really fault the police officers for returning fire when they found themselves getting shot at by Breanna's boyfriend. One of the officers was even wounded in the leg.

But it was only a flesh wound. Police should not be allowed to return fire until one is shot in the head. Apparently.
 
The violent thugs protesters were out in force in Hollywood last night, demanding justice or something;


The protests in Hollywood were part of larger nationwide social justice demonstrations against police violence that were renewed following a Louisville grand jury indicting a fired cop for shooting a wall instead of for the killing of Breonna Taylor.

The overheard footage showed the Prius approaching an intersection and attempting to turn right, which just happened to be mostly blocked by a group of protesters marching peacefully. (LOL !) It was apparent the protesters did not want the car to proceed, but it did. And in doing so, it hit several protesters, prompting others to run up and knock on the car’s windows. The Prius ultimately drove away and cruised to the next street block as the news helicopter continued to record.

That’s when a pickup truck sped up to the Prius, passed it and turned into its path, forcing the Prius to stop. People then got out of the pickup truck and confronted the driver of the Prius, who reversed into another vehicle directly behind it as other protesters — apparently from the earlier collision at the intersection — also approached the car. They all began hitting the car before the Prius’ driver sped off; this time for good.

Watch the video below.

Twatter
 
The violent thugs protesters were out in force in Hollywood last night, demanding justice or something;


The protests in Hollywood were part of larger nationwide social justice demonstrations against police violence that were renewed following a Louisville grand jury indicting a fired cop for shooting a wall instead of for the killing of Breonna Taylor.

The overheard footage showed the Prius approaching an intersection and attempting to turn right, which just happened to be mostly blocked by a group of protesters marching peacefully. (LOL !) It was apparent the protesters did not want the car to proceed, but it did. And in doing so, it hit several protesters, prompting others to run up and knock on the car’s windows. The Prius ultimately drove away and cruised to the next street block as the news helicopter continued to record.

That’s when a pickup truck sped up to the Prius, passed it and turned into its path, forcing the Prius to stop. People then got out of the pickup truck and confronted the driver of the Prius, who reversed into another vehicle directly behind it as other protesters — apparently from the earlier collision at the intersection — also approached the car. They all began hitting the car before the Prius’ driver sped off; this time for good.

Watch the video below.

Twatter

Keep in mind when watching this, the mob that tried to Reginald Denny the guy in the Prius would rule over us. The police, which they want to defund, are at present stopping them from doing that.
 
Well, the drywall got some justice, I guess.
I don't think one can really fault the police officers for returning fire when they found themselves getting shot at by Breanna's boyfriend. One of the officers was even wounded in the leg.
One can fault them for not hitting their target and for killing a noncombatant.
 
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_kGPbCjU2s[/youtube]

The US has a cop problem. The US also has cheerleaders for fascism like worthless cunts Charlie Kirk. It's depressing people like Trausti et al value scum like Charlie Kirk.
 
Back
Top Bottom