She is uncaring of her offspring generating quantity, most of which she kills off. If all life is her children, eating plants is eating distant cousins. Eating fish, fowl and beast is eating closer and closer cousins. Individual lives by the billions (most microscopic) destroyed each second of each day.
That’s an example of uncaring or harshness?
Looks like
exuberance to me.
There’s a kinda
manichean dualism in the split between the Nice and the Mean, the Mother and the Bitch.
But is there even a bad side at all? What’s the split introduced into it for?
Deer, elephants, people… they all need some variety of being kept in check or life’s diversity, its flourishing, is diminished. Too much of one species means too few of others, and earth's features get barren, less exuberant, whenever one species "wins" out over others. Death is a big part of how life flourishes. Which means it’s not the dismal or horrible stand-in for a manichean Dark Side after all.
They put wolves back into Yellowstone. Bad news for the deer? I guess, in the eyes of those with a very fragmented, reductive viewpoint. But life of all kinds bloomed around the deer. The whole regional entity or organ[ism], the ecosystem, became much healthier: its diversity flourished.
How does life flourish? Partly because Mother Nature kills a lot of it! Which is just an alternate way of saying she nourishes it.
[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysa5OBhXz-Q&feature=youtu.be[/YOUTUBE]