Learner
Veteran Member
There is no equivalence between sconce and religion. It is a weak argument by theists. The idea being faith is supported by the equivalent of scientific analysis.
Your faith and accepting the reality of the bible and JC and resurrection And god is not subject to revision or debate. Christians view faith as absolute with an absolute normality.
If you are a Christian you may comet accept as some sects have that evolution may be part of god's plan. The Vatican has said this. But you can never refute god created everything.
Faith is absolute. Science is not. That is the difference. Science is based on unambiguous physical definitions not subject to interpretation, Systems International. Religion is entirely subjective experience. Religion is about deriving a sense of one's place in the universe,. Science is about objective definitions of how the universe works.
There really is no conflict between science and religion, they address different aspects of human existence.
God and faith are not subject to objective scientific proof. As such religion can not use science as some kind of proof and scirnce can not objectively refute god.
I sort of agree with you here, If ... you were to see it from the angle that ; no equivalence means they're not actually opposing arguments i.e. not a "science V creation" debate. Its not at all about theists claiming to having faith as an equivalent to scientific analysis etc.. The equivalence claim by theists is a wrong notion. Its about whether the faith and the theology is either true or not true. The debates are generally more about the methodology of the science used, when one is trying to determine whats true or whats not true.