Tristan Scott
Senior Member
I'm thinking redundant.I'm thinking it's not"Neoliberal leftists?"
Isn't that an oxymoron?
I'm thinking redundant.I'm thinking it's not"Neoliberal leftists?"
Isn't that an oxymoron?
Yeah, I'll go with that. Good answer.I'm thinking redundant.I'm thinking it's not
No clue (about the Koch brothers).So the avatars of Neoliberalism, the Koch brothers, are flagrant liberals?
No clue (about the Koch brothers).So the avatars of Neoliberalism, the Koch brothers, are flagrant liberals?
I don't suppose every instance of a liberal is an instance of one that's flagrant, but I do suppose that Neoliberalism better falls under the umbrella of Liberalism than it does conservatism.
Then what would be the difference between a neoliberal and a neoconservative?No clue (about the Koch brothers).
I don't suppose every instance of a liberal is an instance of one that's flagrant, but I do suppose that Neoliberalism better falls under the umbrella of Liberalism than it does conservatism.
You would be wrong. Dick Cheyney and George W. Bush were avatars of Neoliberalism. The Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute are neoliberal thinktanks. Neoliberals have been the establishment in the Republican party for more than 40 years starting around Nixon and Ford.
As I understand he wants to control illegal immigration and does not oppose the current laws on legal immigration unless I am wrong on the last point.
As hard as it to believe, I think the President has very large latitude on immigration as the law and constitution currently stands.