- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 41,307
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
You know what would solve all these issues? Not doing these dumb caucuses and just voting like normal people and then having Iowa take it's turn at the back of the line for several decades.
This is it in a nutshell. Caucuses leave a great many people without the ability to make their choice heard. People who have to work that night, the old, infirm, or disabled, no absentee ballot.
But I will say this also. I'm against open primaries. Why should people who are not members of the club get a say in who runs the club?
But people are attracted to the Iowa Caucuses because they're so much like a soap opera.
Underway for almost an hour. First results (pre-realignment) due soon.
I think the final ranking will be
Bernie
Biden
Buttigieg
Klobuchar
Warren
Yang
Of course I will probably not get it all right, but I hope to be in the ballpark. Especially Klobuchar is a wildcard as to where she will end up.
This just proves how insane it is to continue to use an extremely outdated method of voting. Only a tiny number of people actually showed up for the caucus vote and most of them were white. I hope that Iowa comes into the 21st Century and votes like normal people do. I also hope this will be the last year that Iowa goes first. And, not everyone who has won in Iowa went on to win the nomination. Tom Harkin had 76% of the delegates when he was running for president. Tom who? Iowa should be considered irrelevant. Why not have a large, diverse state go first or have all the states vote on or near Super Tuesday. Less money would be wasted and no small state would have an outsized influence in the race.
The conspiracy theories are nuts as to what happened in Iowa. They simply had a very bad plan, and it was known very early on Monday morning that there were major problems with the App. Hey Iowa! You fucked up royally.
The Bernie Bros will need a bit more to tie this "conspiracy" together than the Iowa caucuses failing for the first time in history due to a software company whose CEO supports the candidate who blitzed the media to declare victory before the votes were in.
The app, according to several news reports, was developed by the secretive for-profit tech firm Shadow Inc., which has ties to and receives funding from ACRONYM, a Democratic digital non-profit organization. Shadow's CEO is Gerard Niemira, who worked on Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.
"State campaign finance records indicate the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow... more than $60,000 for 'website development' over two installments in November and December of last year," HuffPost reported late Monday. "A Democratic source with knowledge of the process said those payments were for the app that caucus site leaders were supposed to use to upload the results at their locales."
Shadow has also been paid for services by the Nevada Democratic Party and the presidential campaigns of former Vice President Joe Biden and former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
When I saw this when I woke up, all I could think was that the Sanders supporters here are going to be livid.
And generally, everyone should be livid in the sense that the Democrat Party apparently screwed the pooch with this new system.
You know what would solve all these issues? Not doing these dumb caucuses and just voting like normal people and then having Iowa take it's turn at the back of the line for several decades.
You know what would solve all these issues? Not doing these dumb caucuses and just voting like normal people and then having Iowa take it's turn at the back of the line for several decades.
I disagree. There is no reason why party nomination process should mimic the actual election - i.e. primaries.
Caucuses are participatory democracy and allow less known candidates and those not backed by the party machine to be competitive.
Without caucuses, Hillary would have lost to McCain in 2008.
It's really too bad we can't come up with a better system than 1,700 separate meetings in different cafeterias where people who like the same candidate stand in close proximity to one another
It's really too bad we can't come up with a better system than 1,700 separate meetings in different cafeterias where people who like the same candidate stand in close proximity to one another
Wait for more cases of the coronavirus to be spread to the US. Nobody will want to stand in close proximity to anyone and you can switch everything to e-voting, which can be more efficiently run from the Kremlin offices as opposed to needing to funnel money to immoral companies such as Facebook.
Because it's faster and because it simplifies the task of data entry.Why did they need a special app for this? Can’t just call / email the results? They’ve got a paper trail, right? Dumb.
Corrupt, perhaps, more than dumb. Expect similar delays and electronic system problems in the actual Presidential vote tally.Why did they need a special app for this? Can’t just call / email the results? They’ve got a paper trail, right? Dumb.
Why did they need a special app for this? Can’t just call / email the results? They’ve got a paper trail, right? Dumb.
Effectively, the DNC is demonstrating they are at best incompetent and unable to manage basic functions of civic participation, and at worst, shady and duplicitous in their outsourcing of such functions to a private corporation with ties to at least two candidates in the race. If there is such an overlap between incompetence and malice that the outcome is consistent with either explanation, the end result is an erosion of trust in the Dems' ability to function, let alone govern. This may actually help the outsider candidates like Sanders, Gabbard, and Yang.
The Dums could have put up any idiot, buffoon, or blowhard, say like a Dotard...and still won against the Republican (McCain) nominee in 2008.You know what would solve all these issues? Not doing these dumb caucuses and just voting like normal people and then having Iowa take it's turn at the back of the line for several decades.
I disagree. There is no reason why party nomination process should mimic the actual election - i.e. primaries.
Caucuses are participatory democracy and allow less known candidates and those not backed by the party machine to be competitive.
Without caucuses, Hillary would have lost to McCain in 2008.