Is white genocide in our future?

[RVonse]

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/16/is-white-genocide-in-our-future/

PCR makes a very good point about the white farmers in South Africa who are now under attack by the current black South African government. Some will say these are probably "just deserts" for past sins whites have done in that part of the world. All I can say about that situation, is that if I were I white person in South Africa, I sure would not be waiting around to see what happens next, Id be moving far away.

But then PCR compares that to the fake media attacks on the Trump deplorables.
Like how it is now politcally permissible to say its ok to cut Trumps head off or to shoot a deplorable. Yet saying the same thing about any other race would be not permissible.

The more I think this through, I think PCR has a point. For whatever reason, whites in the US are now under attack by the global elite and they better wake up. And soon.

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

But then PCR compares that to the fake media attacks on the Trump deplorables.
Like how it is now politcally permissible to say its ok to cut Trumps head off or to shoot a deplorable. Yet saying the same thing about any other race would be not permissible.

Which politician said those things?

Which media outlet said those things?

 

[Ford]

But then PCR compares that to the fake media attacks on the Trump deplorables.
Like how it is now politcally permissible to say its ok to cut Trumps head off or to shoot a deplorable. Yet saying the same thing about any other race would be not permissible.

Which politician said those things?

Which media outlet said those things?

Paul Craig Roberts, that's who!

He also said this regarding 9/11, so make sure your salt grinder is set to "coarse":

The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency) reports on the twin towers and building 7 are fraudulent. Witnesses at the Toronto Hearings proved that building 7 was a standard controlled demolition and that incendiaries and explosives brought down the twin towers. There is no doubt whatsoever about this. Anyone who declares the contrary has no scientific basis upon which to stand.

 

[laughing dog]

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/16/is-white-genocide-in-our-future/

PCR makes a very good point about the white farmers in South Africa who are now under attack by the current black South African government. Some will say these are probably "just deserts" for past sins whites have done in that part of the world. All I can say about that situation, is that if I were I white person in South Africa, I sure would not be waiting around to see what happens next, Id be moving far away.

But then PCR compares that to the fake media attacks on the Trump deplorables.
Like how it is now politcally permissible to say its ok to cut Trumps head off or to shoot a deplorable. Yet saying the same thing about any other race would be not permissible.

The more I think this through, I think PCR has a point. For whatever reason, whites in the US are now under attack by the global elite and they better wake up. And soon.

If Because the history and culture of South Africa is so similar to that of the USA, PCR (who lost touch with reality years ago) has finally got something correct. I'd say sell all your stuff and move to some other country where white people are safe from the global elitists who use identity politics to foment white genocide.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I do agree about South Africa. What was going to happen was obvious even though so many on the left pretended it would be all Kumbaya.

However, I don't see anything like it likely to happen here. The "threat" that scares the white supremists is "genocide" by interbreeding.

 

[Rhea]

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/08/16/is-white-genocide-in-our-future/

The more I think this through, I think PCR has a point. For whatever reason, whites in the US are now under attack by the global elite and they better wake up. And soon.

So you call it “genocide” when you discuss the voluntary selection of mates and the fact that recessive traits of very fair skin color are less likely to manifest in the offspring? You call that genocide?

And this fabricated tale without citation of “someone” saying it was okay to, what, get out the guillotine? For a corrupt tyrant”. And this somehow plays into this “genocide-by-voluntary-mate-selection”. But not citation so that’s fabricated anyway?

That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard. What’s wrong with you?

 

[bilby]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines

Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no".

The article referenced by the OP, and indeed this entire thread, is a perfect example of Betteridge's law in action.

The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bullshit, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it.

 

[repoman]

Are people subconsciously running the numbers about overpopulation and resources (in addition to global warming devastating farmland like a knife to the heart) OR running on old autopilot programs about various tribes near each other and potential violence?

Will being part of the much LARGER group (genetic or religion...) In times of severe, massive fatality producing downturn make your chance of survival higher that the smaller group?

Will an ethnically etc... mostly uniform nation or region spend more time producing better decisions and less time backbiting between factions?

Are blacks and white in the USA still gonna be talking about slavery Jim Crow reparations when all the ancient aquifers are bone dry and the bread basket heads toward megadrought?

People are selfish and take care of there family and tribe and now race first many of the times. I think this is sensible about half of the time.

 

[Jarhyn]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

 

[Half-Life]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying, "I hate SA doing apartheid, but since the victims are whites I'll let it slide." This is the exact same logic used by the Jim Crow Democrats on blacks.

You have become what you hate.

 

[Patooka]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying, "I hate SA doing apartheid, but since the victims are whites I'll let it slide." This is the exact same logic used by the Jim Crow Democrats on blacks.

You have become what you hate.

This has to be one of the more idiotic interpretations I have ever read. There is literally nothing in Jarhyn's post that's blase or cavalier towards the plight of whites in South Africa. That you could reach that conclusion requires an almost mythical amount of cognitive dissonance.

 

[Jarhyn]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying, "I hate SA doing apartheid, but since the victims are whites I'll let it slide." This is the exact same logic used by the Jim Crow Democrats on blacks.

You have become what you hate.

This has to be one of the more idiotic interpretations I have ever read. There is literally nothing in Jarhyn's post that's blase or cavalier towards the plight of whites in South Africa. That you could reach that conclusion requires an almost mythical amount of cognitive dissonance.

IKR?

One violent asshole child torments another child. That child then eventually "turns the tables" and tortures the other. That other person seeks revenge, and the cycle continues.

If either of these sides were adults they would simply say "no, this torture and revenge is wrong. Blood does not beget blood, and an eye for an eye leaves all eyeless."

At some point, the group in power has to be better and say NO, and offer equality and an end to racism and it's a long, painful road. The first Apartheid state was capable of it: educated and in a position to just stop doing it.

The poor, uneducated, underclass that took over isn't in a similar position, as the newly empowered and still freshly wounded supporters of that faction are expected to cry for blood. It's still fucking wrong, but it's also unfortunately human nature to do so. And they were taught to do so.

It is the cycle of abuse on a massive scale.

It only ends when a child says "I shall not be my father/enemy"

 

[Keith&Co.]

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying,

Halie, whenever YOU say this, what you really mean is that you are going to make crazy shit up.
Every time.

Because you either cannot understand whst people are saying, or you want to troll.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying,

Halie, whenever YOU say this, what you really mean is that you are going to make crazy shit up.
Every time.

Because you either cannot understand whst people are saying, or you want to troll.

That is usually the case when anyone says this. Its Cathy Newman Syndrome.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying,

Halie, whenever YOU say this, what you really mean is that you are going to make crazy shit up.
Every time.

Because you either cannot understand whst people are saying, or you want to troll.

That is usually the case when anyone says this. Its Cathy Newman Syndrome.

I would say that's true, but most people using the phrase are actually TRYING to summarize the content, they just suck at it.

Halfie us so bad it only makes sense if he's trying to write fanfiction of the quote...

 

[laughing dog]

IMO, Half-Life's OP and responses do the opposite of his intent - they promote the appeal of white genocide.

 

[Horatio Parker]

I stopped reading PCR years ago when he insisted Reagan was a friend not an enemy of the Russians.

This one is even more off the wall.

 

[repoman]

If we can root out this influence of our fellow whites:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliyah

Gets Aliyah and does this? Wow, so non hypocritical.

 

[Half-Life]

First, I find it absolutely fucking deplorable that people in SA are engaging in Apartheid again, no matter who is pulling that garbage and no matter who is getting oppressed. I don't think it is to the level of genocide yet; it doesn't need to be a death camp to be a concentration camp though; so there's still that.

That said, there has been a pretty bad issue of racial disparity in South Africa, where much of the money and power has been bound up in the hands of a demographic that has been incredibly racist in their own right. The actions taken now are bad, to be sure, though I think something did need to be done to reset the balance. This is what happens when racist policies play out: there is a day of reconning rather than a day of reconciliation. Apartheid should have ended with an acquiescence of wealth and land and power rather than a twist of arm... Or never happened at all. But no. People couldn't just split the wealth between populations and now things are getting revenge shaped.

But I don't expect certain people who don't even understand how genetic diversity and trait retention/warehousing works (and thus why intermarrying between "races" is a net positive for everyone) to understand the complexities of why forcing a coup leads to a cycle of revenge and conflict.

Absolutely sick. You are essentially saying, "I hate SA doing apartheid, but since the victims are whites I'll let it slide." This is the exact same logic used by the Jim Crow Democrats on blacks.

You have become what you hate.

This has to be one of the more idiotic interpretations I have ever read. There is literally nothing in Jarhyn's post that's blase or cavalier towards the plight of whites in South Africa. That you could reach that conclusion requires an almost mythical amount of cognitive dissonance.

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

 

[Rhea]

Please read the part I bolded. That is essentially saying, "If a few whites have to die today because they were racist in the past, then so be it."

Please enlighten me as to the correct interpretation since I seem to be "missing it."

It totally does not say that. “Something needed to be done” does not require “civilians needed to be targeted to die.”
That is ridiculous and absurd.

What is wrong with you?



The answer was clearly given that the “something” should have been planning re-equalization of wealth to undo the vast damage done. How does that equal white people dying? Pathetic level of snowflake.