Is white genocide in our future?

[laughing dog]

WTF are you babbling about?
That is total bs. Intelligence, in dogs or humans, is multifaceted. Border collie's are very easy trainable, but that is not the only definition of intelligence.

Are you more likely to run away if you see a loose pitbull running down the street or a loose border collie running down the street?

That has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. Really, is this babble intentional or simply genetically driven?

 

[Half-Life]

WTF are you babbling about?
That is total bs. Intelligence, in dogs or humans, is multifaceted. Border collie's are very easy trainable, but that is not the only definition of intelligence.

Are you more likely to run away if you see a loose pitbull running down the street or a loose border collie running down the street?

Neither. When faced with the possibility of an aggressive dog, you make yourself look as large as possible, and possibly run at them, unless they are foaming at the mouth like a white supremecist...

I am far from a white supremacist. What I am pointing out is that we can point to many instances in nature where certain animals are more aggressive than other animals and some animals are smarter than other animals. But, when I use this exact same logic toward races of people, it is considered racism.

When I point out that blacks are 13% of the population and commit 50% of murders, people say that is racist. But, how is a fact racist? Am I trying to make blacks look bad with that stat? No! It's just the facts! But, then I show you that Asians are 6% of the U.S. population and commit 1% of murders. Does this mean I am trying to make Asians look good? No! These are just the facts!

Suppose we were in a country where 71% of people were black and 13% were white and that 13% of whites committed 50% of all murders. Would the blacks not have a right to complain about the "violent whites?"

 

[Patooka]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Half-Life]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Translation: "He's making great points. I can't think of a rebuttal."

But yes, I am not a white supremacist. I am also not a self-hating white. But, self-hating whites accuse not self-hating whites of being white supremacists.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

There is no such thing as a “self-hating white.” If that were true, it would necessarily mean that the person being referred to hates the fact that they have little to no melanin in their skin.

Is that what you were referring to? Careful, it’s a trick question.

 

[Half-Life]

There is no such thing as a “self-hating white.” If that were true, it would necessarily mean that the person being referred to hates the fact that they have little to no melanin in their skin.

Is that what you were referring to? Careful, it’s a trick question.

The self-hating whites who say stuff like, "my race is a disgrace" or "I don't care if the white race goes extinct" or "don't fight for the white race"

It's funny really. Blacks who want to associate more with blacks are called "sticking together." Whites who want to associate more with whites are called "racists." THAT is self-hating: thinking only blacks can stick together and whites can not.

 

[marc]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

There have been a number of examples of people saying extremely racists things, and denying they are racist. I think that some (if they honestly don’t believe they are racist) maybe we’re exposed to racist propaganda/bullshit at a young age and it taints their thinking. Like they hear ‘blacks are more violent’, they never question it, or try to find out if it is true. It just sits in the back of their mind as a ‘fact’ that everyone knows is true. So when they repeat racist bullshit they think they are just telling the truth that some don’t like to hear. Maybe they think racism is actively hating some group, and since they don’t hate that group, they are just telling the ‘truth’ about them, therefore they are not racist.

Just a thought.

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

 

[Keith&Co.]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Translation: "He's making great points. I can't think of a rebuttal."

wow.
Halfie interprets a 'leftist' behavior, but substitutes a self-serving fiction.

Never would have seen that one coming, it's so out of character for halfie...

But yes, I am not a white supremacist. I am also not a self-hating white. But, self-hating whites accuse not self-hating whites of being white supremacists.

All the 'self-hating whites' you think you have identified on this forum are a fiction you tell yourself by misconstruing and flat-out lying about other oeople's posts.

And, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[Keith&Co.]

The self-hating whites who say stuff like, "my race is a disgrace"

The whole race? Or is the comment more ygat some whites havrr done disgraceful things?
Who, here, is wnhite and condemns the entire white race?
Betcha cannot find two posts to support this.

or "I don't care if the white race goes extinct"

how is that self-hating?

or "don't fight for the white race"

how is that self-hating?

See, if you ARE racist, then these race matters are very important to you, sure.
I cannot see a non-racist reason to 'fight for the white race,' though.

Don't get me wrong, several of my most favorite Playmates are white girls. #1, #s 5-7. But it's not an issue i think deserves legislation to preserve.

It's funny really. Blacks who want to associate more with blacks are called "sticking together." Whites who want to associate more with whites are called "racists." THAT is self-hating: thinking only blacks can stick together and whites can not.

No, this is not thinking that whites cannot stick together.
This is thinking that whites who make a point of sticking with other whites are being racists.

And again, you show your terrible concern with what the other races are getting away with, that you feel you are denied.

 

[Keith&Co.]

In the military, at any command, people in a given department hang out together. Engineering with engineering, weapons with weapons, cooks with cooks.
If any such collective was all white, or all black, or all Philippine, no one blinked. Or if a division was multiracial, not one blink at the group. Just looked at them, recognized 'A-gang' or 'seamen gang' and not another thought.
Also, everyone on the softball team hung out together, no matter their department, no one cared if it happened that everyone on the team was or was not white.
The officers hung together, but they were the O-gang anyway.
The goats (chief petty officers) hung out.
The video gamers, the D&D gang, the Christains, both Mormons, and the people with a shared interest in the Amazon Woman Porn hung out in the E&E space and no one looked too closely.

Group after group after group had one or more shared interests or backgrounds or duties or told really really specialized jokes (only FTBs, for example, laughed at my joke with the punchline 'he thought it was in the SSPINST 9100!' ), and no one examined it closely.

For some reason, the submaine community does not attract many black volunteers. So, i have made patrols where there were as few as six blacks in the entire crew.
They often hung out together.
I noticed, figured an interest or background i did not share, never thought much about it, same as a group of sonarmen, or Baptists, or chiefs.
But, yeah, some people got quite uncomfortable at the thought that some five or six guys were on the mess decks, talking, and the only connection the viewer could percieve was color.

No one EVER said there could not be a white group, or thatall-white groups were racist. Because with 6 black crew, and 18 divisions on board, we couldn't even have conducted divisional training for most of the ship.


Now, if someone tried to start a WHITES ONLY group, that would have been different. That would have racist.
But just a group of friends hanging out? I think most people don't give a fuck. Until you make a point of who your group excludes.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

Until you make a point of who your group excludes.

And that's it in a nut. It's about exclusion. That's why it's so disingenuous for the David Dukes of the world to try to flip that and claim it isn't about that at all when in fact that is its sole purpose. That's precisely how a cult forms. ALL ARE WELCOME! False. None are welcome, but the specially targeted ones. The rest will be weeded out summarily, but there is a purpose--an intent--involved that the sheep joining aren't privy to and/or are lied to about.

Exclusivity is what is being sold, it's just being sold in the guise of inclusivity. We aren't excluding anyone. They can have their own clubs. This is OUR club.

I was in a comedy show in the 90s called The Whitey Show. It was a live show--LONG before Colbert Report--that parodied "talk" shows like the Morton Downey Jr. show. One of the gags was a guest author on the show--a white guy, dressed like Nixon--who wrote a book about the Republican "tent" and how large a tent it was and how wonderful and diverse the tent was and how this new Republican tent has changed from the old. The punchline:

Host: What's the name of your book?
Author: "Keep the Jews Out of the Tent."

 

[laughing dog]

But yes, I am not a white supremacist. I am also not a self-hating white. But, self-hating whites accuse not self-hating whites of being white supremacists.

Let me play this game.

White supremacists accuse self-hating whites of accusing not-self hating whites of being white supremacists.

 

[Half-Life]

I am far from a white supremacist.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

EDIT: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

There have been a number of examples of people saying extremely racists things, and denying they are racist. I think that some (if they honestly don’t believe they are racist) maybe we’re exposed to racist propaganda/bullshit at a young age and it taints their thinking. Like they hear ‘blacks are more violent’, they never question it, or try to find out if it is true. It just sits in the back of their mind as a ‘fact’ that everyone knows is true. So when they repeat racist bullshit they think they are just telling the truth that some don’t like to hear. Maybe they think racism is actively hating some group, and since they don’t hate that group, they are just telling the ‘truth’ about them, therefore they are not racist.

Just a thought.

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

Already addressed and went unrefuted in post #142

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Obviously this doesn't mean I see a black person and go, "OMG! He's a murderer because blacks are 13% and commit 50%!"

But overall, that number is very scary.

 

[Koyaanisqatsi]

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

No, it would not. It would qualify that you don't understand how such statistics work or what they mean, but it most definitely would not qualify as an imaginary and random "grouping" of people being more or less violent than some other imaginary and random grouping of people.

For example, 100% of all serial murderers have skin. You have skin, therefore you are a serial murderer.

See how incredibly stupid that reasoning is? Now apply.

 

[Half-Life]

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

No, it would not. It would qualify that you don't understand how such statistics work or what they mean, but it most definitely would not qualify as an imaginary and random "grouping" of people being more or less violent than some other imaginary and random grouping of people.

For example, 100% of all serial murderers have skin. You have skin, therefore you are a serial murderer.

See how incredibly stupid that reasoning is? Now apply.

But for comparison, I showed you that Asians are 6% of the U.S. population and commit 1% of murders.

Are you going to say these stats do not prove that Asian Americans are, on average, less violent?

 

[repoman]

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

No, it would not. It would qualify that you don't understand how such statistics work or what they mean, but it most definitely would not qualify as an imaginary and random "grouping" of people being more or less violent than some other imaginary and random grouping of people.

For example, 100% of all serial murderers have skin. You have skin, therefore you are a serial murderer.

See how incredibly stupid that reasoning is? Now apply.

But for comparison, I showed you that Asians are 6% of the U.S. population and commit 1% of murders.

Are you going to say these stats do not prove that Asian Americans are, on average, less violent?

This is an example of white people only being allowed to indirectly advocate for their self interest via a proxy of another racial group. White privilege?

So whites are using Asians getting hurt by affirmative action because it is RACIST to talk sbout it hurting whites. Any talk of it is white supremacy, even thinking about it...

 

[marc]

you are totally ignoring my actual question:

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Been reading up on How to lie with statistics?

Exactly how was that %50 determined? Do I need to pull up the news of the sherif that would just have random black people arrested whenever there was a crime in his area without a clear suspect? Is that number pulled from convictions, but ignores cases where the person was later exonerated? (Central Park 5, plenty of death row inmates, etc). It probably ignores the murders that happen by people ‘standing their ground’

 

[Half-Life]

you are totally ignoring my actual question:

Hey Halfie, how do you define actual racism?

Blacks are 13% of the U.S. population and commit 50% of the murders. Wouldn't that qualify as more violent?

Been reading up on How to lie with statistics?

Exactly how was that %50 determined? Do I need to pull up the news of the sherif that would just have random black people arrested whenever there was a crime in his area without a clear suspect? Is that number pulled from convictions, but ignores cases where the person was later exonerated? (Central Park 5, plenty of death row inmates, etc). It probably ignores the murders that happen by people ‘standing their ground’

Go look it up. How come you aren't scrambling to make excuses for the Asian stat?

 

[Half-Life]

But for comparison, I showed you that Asians are 6% of the U.S. population and commit 1% of murders.

Are you going to say these stats do not prove that Asian Americans are, on average, less violent?

This is an example of white people only being allowed to indirectly advocate for their self interest via a proxy of another racial group. White privilege?

So whites are using Asians getting hurt by affirmative action because it is RACIST to talk sbout it hurting whites. Any talk of it is white supremacy, even thinking about it...

Asians are talking about Asians getting hurt by affirmative action. They are suing some schools over it.

 

[RVonse]

What are you talking about? People who go to a coffee shop with a MAGA hat are not looking to oppress anyone. They just want coffee.

Are you confused?

Let's put it this way. Suppose you are working the counter at a Starbucks. A man comes in wearing a MAGA hat. Are you telling me it is rational to immediately start yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs "get out!" like a 5 year old?

I'm sure that would look real good to right-wingers and undecided voters.

MAGA hats are basically symbols of a desire to oppress. They're like KKK robes minus the anonymity.

Really? How did that come to past? You do know that MAGA stands for "make America great again" right? Kind of like Obama's slogan "Ready for Change" or the pink pussy caps that stand for female sex harrasment.

How come those other political slogans which were messages far outside of just making America great again didnt get miss-interpreted and dog whistled the same way?

Is it because the Democrats are more clever then the deplorables?