I don't care enough about her case to even click a link because it is irrelevant. I'm also sure that what little information is available is more agenda driven than accurate and complete
How comforting (and time saving!) it must be to simply assume that one knows, rather than actually knowing. How
easy to dismiss the lives and struggles of others when you know very little about them, and avoid learning more.
That's some more bullshit, of the vague mischaracterization variety.
I don't claim to know. I said that. I don't find the one irrelevant case important enough to bother wading through a bunch of agenda driven "reporting".
Tell me. Why did the rich Connecticut drug dealer get mentioned in the first place? How is that case relevant to the OP?
I think I know. But I'm curious about your opinion.
Tom