barbos
Contributor
Yes it did.No, it didn't; And no, it isn't.
Yes it did.No, it didn't; And no, it isn't.
No, it absolutely does not.However, real-money GDP makes most sense for comparison of which economy is bigger.
Preemptive self Defense against US aggression.So you are denying that Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022?Yep.What? US aggression against Russia? And Europe too?
No, it absolutely does not.
Kinda like when Germany preemptively invaded Poland after preemptively invading Czechoslovakia?Preemptive self Defense against US aggression.
Yes it did.
No, not like that.Kinda like when Germany preemptively invaded Poland after preemptively invading Czechoslovakia?
So what is a better way to compare national economies?No, it absolutely does not.However, real-money GDP makes most sense for comparison of which economy is bigger.
Kinda what I was thinking - a veritable rogues' gallery of fucked up gummintz and shithole nations.All in all, they were all just BRICS in the wall...
What you are missing is conflicting interests. What's of value to the people isn't always what's of value to the leaders. The western approach is to try to help the people--but that is in conflict with the leader's desire to loot.Founding members are not busket cases. South Africa has some troubles. But BRIC part of BRICS are progressing rather well. I am little worried about speed with which some busket cases get in, though.Many, if not most, of the BRICS countries are basket cases economically and politically.
To me this is all a demonstration of unhappiness of the 3rd world with the US/West.
I'm talking about what has actually been happening.This is a western colonial projection.China wants to foreclose, they don't actually care if the country gets it's act together.
I already told you - PPP GDP.So what is a better way to compare national economies?No, it absolutely does not.However, real-money GDP makes most sense for comparison of which economy is bigger.
Western approach is to help their own oligarchs, helping people (western ones at that) is purely accidental.What you are missing is conflicting interests. What's of value to the people isn't always what's of value to the leaders. The western approach is to try to help the people--but that is in conflict with the leader's desire to loot.Founding members are not busket cases. South Africa has some troubles. But BRIC part of BRICS are progressing rather well. I am little worried about speed with which some busket cases get in, though.Many, if not most, of the BRICS countries are basket cases economically and politically.
To me this is all a demonstration of unhappiness of the 3rd world with the US/West.
No, you are not. You are talking about what you heard in western media.I'm talking about what has actually been happening.This is a western colonial projection.China wants to foreclose, they don't actually care if the country gets it's act together.
Literally years ago and I made a point of that. He was part of TYT when he spat at Jones' face (he has since denied saying he did it when he is on shows like Tim Pool or Russel Brand). In the last 6 years he has promoted Covid conspiracy theories, Tucker Carlsonesque Jan6 misinformation and wall to wall Biden bashing. Jimmy Dore is about as left wing as Alan Dershowitz or Dave Rubin (another TYT in case you're wondering).What exactly makes Dore "right wing"? He seems to be a so-called "progressive". He supported Bernie, he was part of the far-left "The Young Turks" show ...
Now that this thread has reached its second page, do you get now why I say BRICS is more often than not (but not solely) being used as a dog whistle for pro-Putin propaganda?I've been hearing about them since mid-2000s, from various sources, including news media. New rising economies, end of dollar hegemony, blah blah. Things died down a few years later as their economies started facing difficulties. Now we are hearing more about them again.
Market rate GDP is better for comparing sizes of economies since they are using the same metric to compare them - usually the US dollar - and not an adjusted metric that is different in each country. PPP has its uses, but not for this.I already told you - PPP GDP.
So you keep claiming, but have not provided any links to any evidence.And according to that Russia surpassed Germany and became the largest economy in Europe (World Bank).
I know that some leftists are opposed to surrogacy as they view it as "exploitation" of women. What does that have to do with BRICS?When they did that, some of their audience was outraged, but DR blamed their outrage on "the left", as though left-wingers are somehow to blame for many right-wingers' narrow definitions of "family".
As such GDP (PPP) fails to measure the relative sizes of economies as it measures economies using different yardsticks. Market-price GDP uses the same yardstick.Purchasing power parity (PPP) is the most common method for comparing GDP of countries since it adjusts for different price levels.
Per-capita GDP (PPP) gives you a measure of well-being inside a country, yes. Per-capita GDP (MP) gives you a measure of well-being when trying to buy something on the international market. Say a Russian and a German want to buy some groceries, of a meal at a restaurant or a hair-cut in their country. PPP is appropriate here. But say both want to go to a vacation in Greece? Market price matters here, not PPP.Per capita PPP GDP is the accepted way of comparing economic well being between countries.
IMF said:Germany 5.72 thousand
Russian Federation 5.23 thousand