steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
I read fine.
You are trying to justify a belief in many worlds.
A lot of your threads on philosophy are excursions into fantasy. Nothing particularly wrong with escapism, it just is not science.
Again you use 'philosophy is this or does that'. Ethics and logic came from individuals not categorizes and labels.
You are defending a word 'philosophy' wihjout definition,. the senseless of philosophical debate. Debate over abstractions.
Ethics? Science gave us weapons of mass destruction and technology that lead to climate change.
End of diversion. Go to last post here.
You are trying to justify a belief in many worlds.
A lot of your threads on philosophy are excursions into fantasy. Nothing particularly wrong with escapism, it just is not science.
Again you use 'philosophy is this or does that'. Ethics and logic came from individuals not categorizes and labels.
You are defending a word 'philosophy' wihjout definition,. the senseless of philosophical debate. Debate over abstractions.
Ethics? Science gave us weapons of mass destruction and technology that lead to climate change.
End of diversion. Go to last post here.
"Love of wisdom" would be a better translation than "love of knowledge". A love of knowledge would be philognosis, philepisteme or some such construction. So, love of wisdom. And as I do love the pursuit of wisdom, I see no need to dress that turkey in further verbiage, it's fine the way it is. I love science, also. Enough so that I dedicated my life's work to teaching a branch or two of it! But, that does not contradict my wider experience of loving knowledge, and learning, for their own sakes. Science is my favorite methodology for seeking wisdom from the material world, not...
Last edited: