Jarhyn said:
It's interesting that you find so much time and effort and energy caring to obfuscate that evidence exists of hundreds of unmarked graves, as documented and linked to, so much that you call it false.
It's interesting that you make damaging accusations against me that are false and you should know they are false on the basis of the evidence available to you, and yet you are sincere.
First, what I call "false" is your statement:
Jarhyn said:
Reality: the remains of 215 children, some as young as 3 years old, were found buried on the site of what was once Canada’s largest Indigenous residential school near Kamloops, British Columbia.
I call the statement false because it is false. Now, I get why you would have been mistaken at first, after all major news websites repeated that false statement in the past. However, by the time this thread was started, there was readily available conclusive evidence that it was false.
Second, remember, you used that statement to say that
Jarhyn said:
To utter one statement to cover up another statement when it is known to cover the first statement is fucked up and evil behavior.
making false and disparaging accusations against either Metaphor or me or both. Of course, no one was trying to cover up your statement "Reality: the remains of 215 children, some as young as 3 years old, were found buried on the site of what was once Canada’s largest Indigenous residential school near Kamloops, British Columbia.", since it was obviously false by the time this thread was started, so even if any of us were a caricature villain wanting to engage in fucked up and evil behavior just for the pure pleasure of it, we would not choose to try to cover up that which never happened.
Third, again, I usually post to reply when there is some
disagreement, not when there isn't.
Jarhyn said:
They were just not found by excavating dirt.
They were found in the same way the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy, or the planets of distant stars are found: through observation of their effects on nature, using imaging technologies.
We do not have to exhume a corpse to know it is in the ground.
We have found the bodies, we just have not dug them up and looked at them.
No, they were not found in the same way the supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy, or the planets of distant stars are found.
To be more precise, they were found in the same way that the unmarked graves at Camsell Hospital site were found: using ground-penetrating radar and interpreting some spots as unmarked graves. In the case of Camsell Hospital, some people actually decided to dig up the bodies and look at them. However, it turned out they found
zero bodies. That sort of makes the case for the other 215 bodies much, much weaker, on the basis of the evidence available to a reasonable reader, so unless you have some inside evidence on the investigation - which you have not shown at all -, it is not epistemically rational on your part to assess that those 215 bodies have in fact been found, or that they exist in the first place. How about we wait and see what happens if someone chooses to dig, instead of jumping to the conclusion that 215 bodies were found?