• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Panderer in chief

hillary-blm-2015-08-11.jpg


Wow, look how she panders to Black lives.

Next she's going to be pandering to Trayvon Martin's family.
trayvonweb27n-3-web.jpg


Or Will Smith:
will-smith-image2.jpg


Or that guy from the Old Spice commercials:
c30.jpg


Or that other guy from the Old Spice commercials:
maxresdefault.jpg
 
I notice you like to lump Dem candidates together so neatly and also have no idea what pandering is.
Why don't you enlighten us oh great arkirk?
Your position has a name. That is Nativist, and could also be considered chicken littleism or Xenophobia on steroids.
Wrong. I do not advocate ending all immigration, not even from Latin America. But immigration should be legal, based on our ability to absorb the immigrant and our needs. Also people from diverse countries should be given opportunity to immigrate rather than it being so heavily slanted toward Hispanics due to illegal influx.
For all those reasons, I oppose illegal immigration. Why should illegals be treated better than those who want to come to the US the right way?

Something you do not seem to understand about human events...especially migrations...is that they have never been controlled or even slowed by raids and deportations and punishments.
I understand that mass migration has never benefited the host society. Thus it needs to be resisted. US (like Europe) can not reasonably accommodate all who want to come here. Hence restrictions on immigration. Saying that there should be no illegal immigration and reasonable restrictions on legal immigration does not make one anti-immigration. Much less "xenophobic" or "nativist".
The immigrant is there as a natural human response to harsh events in the countries of origin.
US cannot absorb all those fleeing harsh conditions in their countries of origin.
So often, these immigrants are running from actions corporate America has taken in their country of origin.
Yepp, go-to statement by the far left. Blame US for everything.
This is particularly true in central American countries and would also be true for Arab countries if America were geographically contiguous with that area.
I see the mess in Cuba for example being chiefly due to a band of thugs supported by the USSR bloodily taking over power and installing a communist dictatorship.
Immigrants are poor people who don't have anything but the desire to live a good life.
Yes, but that does not mean US should accept all those who want to come here. That'd quickly overwhelm US.
Along comes Trump and perhaps you and turns them into rapists, thieves and murderers. That my friend is xenophobia on steroids.
Well many illegals are also engaging in other crimes.

Hillary is politicking on these issues, not pandering.
What's the difference?
We must always attempt to encompass the entire human race with our ideas of civilization and stop trying to reinvent the "nigger."
That does not mean we should allow the entire human race to illegally immigrate here.

- - - Updated - - -

That's great! I think that people who are threatened by immigrants who can't speak the language and have a 4th grade education need to look at the mirror.
Perhaps I want a driver who understand what I am talking about? Or a gardener who can read the instructions on the bottle of weed killer.

And again, I have nothing against immigration per se. But illegal immigration is quite another thing.
 
Wow, look how she panders to Black lives.
Unfortunately they all are. O'Malley even apologized that he said that all lives matter. :rolleyes:

Next she's going to be pandering to Trayvon Martin's family.
Did you hear? Trayvon's mother endorsed Hillary.

Or that guy from the Old Spice commercials:
Or that other guy from the Old Spice commercials:
Other than homoerotic imagery do these two have a point?
 
Wrong. I do not advocate ending all immigration, not even from Latin America. But immigration should be legal, based on our ability to absorb the immigrant and our needs.
So you are saying that the government is better able to decide what the nation needs than a free market?

Well said, comrade.

:innocent1:
 
Other than homoerotic imagery do these two have a point?

Interesting, whenever you see a picture of a well-muscled black man, you think it's homoerotic.

Do you also think this is homoerotic?

Simeon-Panda-sexy-black-men.jpg


Do you really think that Hillary is pandering to him or maybe that you are fixated on fear of him?
 
Interesting, whenever you see a picture of a well-muscled black man, you think it's homoerotic.
Black has nothing to do with it. Any picture of a "well-muscled" almost naked man posted by another man would qualify as homoerotic. Not that there is anything wrong with it, whatever turns you on, it just would be a better fit in the Lounge.

- - - Updated - - -

So you are saying that the government is better able to decide what the nation needs than a free market?
In this case yes, unless the government is pro-illegals.
Well said, comrade.
Not being a free market absolutist does not make one a commie you know. Besides, American left-wingers tend to be into accepting millions of Latin American illegals.
 
Black has nothing to do with it. Any picture of a "well-muscled" almost naked man posted by another man would qualify as homoerotic.

Much like any art, erotica is in the eye of the beholder. Identifying an image posted by another person as erotica says as much, or more, about the person making the identification than it does about the person posting it (especially if the person posting it does so with no reference to erotica or sexuality).
 
Black has nothing to do with it. Any picture of a "well-muscled" almost naked man posted by another man would qualify as homoerotic. Not that there is anything wrong with it, whatever turns you on, it just would be a better fit in the Lounge.

So am I right to think that you also consider pictures of scantily-clad, well-formed women as being homoerotic?

Listen, just because the pics above give you certain stirrings doesn't make them homoerotic.
 
So am I right to think that you also consider pictures of scantily-clad, well-formed women as being homoerotic?
Only if posted by women. ;)
Listen, just because the pics above give you certain stirrings doesn't make them homoerotic.
They stir nothing but I am wondering why Don is so obsessed with posting them.
 
Back
Top Bottom