lpetrich
Contributor
Peace for our time? Often misquoted as "Peace in our time". That is what Neville Chamberlain called his peace deal with Adolf Hitler, a deal that involved giving him the Sudetenland areas of Czechoslovakia, areas with a lot of ethnic Germans in them, ethnic Germans that were allegedly being mistreated by the Czechs there. Hitler claimed that that was all he wanted, and Chamberlain believed him.
Trump-Kim summit: what it means and what comes next - Vox
Trump-Kim summit: what it means and what comes next - Vox
Vipin Narang, interviewed in that article:President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un just signed an agreement committing to work together to “build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.”
The agreement, while a positive sign, offers little proof that North Korea will follow up on its promises to “work toward the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.” North Korea has made similar promises to the previous three US administrations, and each time they have reneged.
And in a lot of ways, Kim ends up the winner, because he has extracted a freeze on US-South Korean military exercises as long as the dialogue continues, and as long as North Korea continues to freeze its development of nukes.
...
China looks like a big winner. Their ultimate goal is a nuclear North Korea that doesn’t provoke a war on the Korean Peninsula, so that there’s a buffer between South Korea, US forces, and China. So China and North Korea are unambiguous winners here. The US comes out mostly even, having gained a nice photo op. South Korea, depending on how it reacts, can still gain from this. Japan appears to be the immediate loser.