Democrats really need to hang the actions of senators around their necks like an albatross. 2020 should have the most straightforward election ads ever made. "This cunt voted for and supported corruption and cover ups for the executive branch like it's no big deal. Literally vote for anyone else."
What do you have against vaginas? Why do you think it's a legitimately derogatory term? Just add "bleeding" as an adjective, and you're in exactly the same territory as Trump.
There are plenty of short scabrous insulting nouns that are not gender specific, and thus would more accurately cover both the men and women Republican senators who will vote to acquit grabby flabby Don. Why didn't one of those nouns come to mind?
It's cultural, not good, just cultural.
Not so long ago you needed a penis to vote. A vagina would not do. And just before that happened you had to have a white penis. A man could have a beautiful red or yellow or black penis, and a lot bigger than a white penis but it didn't matter because your penis had to be a white penis.
And it had to be a rich white penis. A wrinkly white penis that was wealthy could vote but not a healthy, stout poor penis. You had to have a penis, a white penis, and a wealthy white penis. That was just the law.
But even having a wealthy white penis wasn't enough because it had to be a Jesus penis, you know, a penis that belonged to the Church of England. Even a wealthy white penis wasn't enough if your penis wasn't a Jesus penis.
I could explain further but that's kinda how we got to cunts as derogatory.
/derail
