Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

[Keith&Co.]

Suppose, just suppose, the Republicans change their mind and want to call witnesses. Should his name be revealed if they try to call him to the stand?

What can the whistleblower contribute that we don't already have?

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

 

[Half-Life]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

If he made the whole thing up, that would be important, right?

 

[Keith&Co.]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

If he made the whole thing up, that would be important, right?

He (or she) said, 'I heard some disturbing things that people should investigate.'
They investigated.
They found disturbing things. Reported same to committee, who gathered testimony and submitted that to the House.

If he made the whole thing up, it would be an amazing coincidence that they found shit RIGHT where he imagined they should look. Imagine the look on his face.

Like if we had found WMDs where some lying liar said they were at...

 

[Keith&Co.]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

If he made the whole thing up, that would be important, right?

Actually, since the current defense, and the babbling of the GOP, is that Trump did do the thing, but the thing should be tolerated, then if he DID make it all up, he is psychic, and you have to admit it.
Why still try to attack the whistleblower?

 

[Half-Life]

If he made the whole thing up, that would be important, right?

He (or she) said, 'I heard some disturbing things that people should investigate.'
They investigated.
They found disturbing things. Reported same to committee, who gathered testimony and submitted that to the House.

If he made the whole thing up, it would be an amazing coincidence that they found shit RIGHT where he imagined they should look. Imagine the look on his face.

Like if we had found WMDs where some lying liar said they were at...

They found some stuff that wasn't grounds for Trump's removal.

Also, the idea that Saddam had WMD's wasn't very far fetched. A terrorist nation who hates the West might want to use WMD's to kill us all? I'm glad we investigated. It's better than not investigating and then they attack us and then you guys go, "You idiots! Why didn't you at least go check if they had them?!?!?"

As an old saying goes, "Better to be on the toilet and not have to crap than be off the toilet and have to crap."

 

[Keith&Co.]

If he made the whole thing up, that would be important, right?

He (or she) said, 'I heard some disturbing things that people should investigate.'
They investigated.
They found disturbing things. Reported same to committee, who gathered testimony and submitted that to the House.

If he made the whole thing up, it would be an amazing coincidence that they found shit RIGHT where he imagined they should look. Imagine the look on his face.

Like if we had found WMDs where some lying liar said they were at...

They found some stuff that wasn't grounds for Trump's removal.

yeah, that's the GOP take. But is there anything in the whistleblower's complaint that was not supported by someone or something in the investigation?

Also, the idea that Saddam had WMD's wasn't very far fetched.

but still, it was presented as a fact, not a possibility.
So, a lie.

A terrorist nation who hates the West might want to use WMD's to kill us all? I'm glad we investigated.

once more, we did not investigate.
We invaded.
And we're still fighting there. The endless war Trump said he'd end, when? Within first 100 days, wasn't it?

It's better than not investigating and then they attack us and then you guys go, "You idiots! Why didn't you at least go check if they had them?!?!?"

yeah. Lies that turn out well are okay, aren't they?
But they're still lies.

This would be comparable if they had gone straight from the WB to impeachment, and 20 years later called it 'an investigation.'

 

[Ford]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

They don't want him to testify. They want him publicly identified so they can get about the business of making his life a living hell. Or ending it, if possible.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

And this changes things, how? Is there something missing in the investigation of his complaint?

They don't want him to testify. They want him publicly identified so they can get about the business of making his life a living hell. Or ending it, if possible.

...and discouraging any others.

 

[ZiprHead]

Suppose, just suppose, the Republicans change their mind and want to call witnesses. Should his name be revealed if they try to call him to the stand?

What can the whistleblower contribute that we don't already have?

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

By being an official whistleblower, he's already done that.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Having everything he says be officially stated on the record.

By being an official whistleblower, he's already done that.

And his claims were already cooberated.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

I'd rather they were corroborated.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Wow, got nothing so resorting to grammar retorts.

 

[Jayjay]

Wow, got nothing so resorting to grammar retorts.

Actually a spelling retort.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Wow, got nothing so resorting to grammar retorts.

Actually a spelling retort.

I’ll that one to the English majors, like Michelle Malkin, to decide.

So, did Jason have anymore herring to serve up?

 

[Elixir]

Suppose, just suppose, the Republicans change their mind and want to call witnesses

Aw shucks, let's just suppose Democrats change their minds and apologize for making up some quid pro quo crap about Trump and then ask the DOJ to arrest Biden.

 

[Ford]

Suppose, just suppose, the Republicans change their mind and want to call witnesses

Aw shucks, let's just suppose Democrats change their minds and apologize for making up some quid pro quo crap about Trump and then ask the DOJ to arrest Biden.

Hey, remember...the Republicans wanted to call witnesses who were actually on the infamous phone call.

You know, like Hunter Biden.

 

[Elixir]

Wow, got nothing so resorting to grammar retorts.

Actually a spelling retort.

I’ll that one to the English majors, like Michelle Malkin, to decide.

So, did Jason have anymore herring to serve up?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

You Democrats need to get angrier than grammar. We need to keep talking treason. Because that's what this is.

Now Libertarians who aren't talking about tyrant's blood feeding the Tree of Liberty are complicit and partisan. We don't need distractions from Libertarians. We need to know how you will help us stop the maniac in office.

 

[lpetrich]

The quotation: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure."

Source: The tree of liberty... (Quotation) | Thomas Jefferson's Monticello

 

[Arctish]

Suppose, just suppose, the Republicans change their mind and want to call witnesses

Aw shucks, let's just suppose Democrats change their minds and apologize for making up some quid pro quo crap about Trump and then ask the DOJ to arrest Biden.

Hey, remember...the Republicans wanted to call witnesses who were actually on the infamous phone call.

You know, like Hunter Biden.

They were for witnesses before they were against them.

Before John Bolton said he'd testify before the Senate, that is.