• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Police Takedown in the USA

none

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
3,330
Location
outside
Basic Beliefs
atheist/ignostic
Can't the police takedown move where they body slam people be replaced with "get on the ground or I will tazer you"?
Some woman got the takedown move somewhere around Denver
She was tall thin blonde, then a semi conscious perp
 
I wonder how much this traumatic head injury is going to cost the department.
Any links to what took place?
 
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2017/04/09/csu-michaela-surat-fort-collins-old-town/
...
The video, which was taken outside Bondi Beach Bar in Old Town, shows 22-year-old Michaela Surat being thrown to the ground by a Fort Collins Police Services officer.
...
Police said the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control.”

Surat was taken to the Larimer County Jail where she was charged with third-degree assault and obstructing a peace officer.

CBS4 reached out to Surat for comment, and an explanation of her side of the story. Request for comment via phone calls and texts were not returned.
Not sure if there is any other video that could give more context if such a thing exists
 
i think she got lucky and most of the impact was on her shoulder. Still, that cop needs a new line of work.
 
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2017/04/09/csu-michaela-surat-fort-collins-old-town/
...
The video, which was taken outside Bondi Beach Bar in Old Town, shows 22-year-old Michaela Surat being thrown to the ground by a Fort Collins Police Services officer.
...
Police said the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control.”

Surat was taken to the Larimer County Jail where she was charged with third-degree assault and obstructing a peace officer.

CBS4 reached out to Surat for comment, and an explanation of her side of the story. Request for comment via phone calls and texts were not returned.
Not sure if there is any other video that could give more context if such a thing exists

I love the way they say the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control”, as though that made everything OK.

If that's not true, then clearly the officer should be in deep shit for using non-standard and violent techniques when arresting people.

But if it IS true, then clearly the ENTIRE DEPARTMENT should be in deep shit for making violent techniques their standard when arresting people.

Hiding behind standard operating procedure simply doesn't work - if SOP is immoral, then that might allow the discredited Nuremberg defence to be available to individual cops, but only at the cost of exposing the entire department as immoral.

"Why did you commit an unnecessary and unprovoked assault on a citizen?"
"Oh, it's OK; We do that all the time".​

What clown thought that that was a good defence?
 
In the past couple of decades or more, the Shock and Awe technique has moved from the military to the police. The over-the-top, hyperaggressiveness is supposed to shock a suspect into indecisiveness and facilitate arrest and handling. This aggressiveness can be problematic, though, and is often misapplied.
 
So what has she done in the first place?

i think she got lucky and most of the impact was on her shoulder. Still, that cop needs a new line of work.

She is also lucky that she didn't get a boot in the head.
 
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2017/04/09/csu-michaela-surat-fort-collins-old-town/

Not sure if there is any other video that could give more context if such a thing exists

I love the way they say the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control”, as though that made everything OK.

If that's not true, then clearly the officer should be in deep shit for using non-standard and violent techniques when arresting people.

But if it IS true, then clearly the ENTIRE DEPARTMENT should be in deep shit for making violent techniques their standard when arresting people.

Hiding behind standard operating procedure simply doesn't work - if SOP is immoral, then that might allow the discredited Nuremberg defence to be available to individual cops, but only at the cost of exposing the entire department as immoral.

"Why did you commit an unnecessary and unprovoked assault on a citizen?"
"Oh, it's OK; We do that all the time".​

What clown thought that that was a good defence?

Throwing her down ends the resistance before it has a chance to escalate. That's why it's done.
 
I love the way they say the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control”, as though that made everything OK.

If that's not true, then clearly the officer should be in deep shit for using non-standard and violent techniques when arresting people.

But if it IS true, then clearly the ENTIRE DEPARTMENT should be in deep shit for making violent techniques their standard when arresting people.

Hiding behind standard operating procedure simply doesn't work - if SOP is immoral, then that might allow the discredited Nuremberg defence to be available to individual cops, but only at the cost of exposing the entire department as immoral.

"Why did you commit an unnecessary and unprovoked assault on a citizen?"
"Oh, it's OK; We do that all the time".​

What clown thought that that was a good defence?

Throwing her down ends the resistance before it has a chance to escalate.
So does shooting her in the head.
That's why it's done.
I know that's why it's done. The question is why it's considered acceptable to do it.
 
[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOgx6I14sRI[/YOUTUBE]
 
I love the way they say the technique used to take Surat down was “standard arrest control”, as though that made everything OK.

If that's not true, then clearly the officer should be in deep shit for using non-standard and violent techniques when arresting people.

But if it IS true, then clearly the ENTIRE DEPARTMENT should be in deep shit for making violent techniques their standard when arresting people.

Hiding behind standard operating procedure simply doesn't work - if SOP is immoral, then that might allow the discredited Nuremberg defence to be available to individual cops, but only at the cost of exposing the entire department as immoral.

"Why did you commit an unnecessary and unprovoked assault on a citizen?"
"Oh, it's OK; We do that all the time".​

What clown thought that that was a good defence?

Throwing her down ends the resistance before it has a chance to escalate. That's why it's done.

Why can't they use a Mandt hold, rather than violence?
http://www.mandtsystem.com/
 
Can't the police takedown move where they body slam people be replaced with "get on the ground or I will tazer you"?
Some woman got the takedown move somewhere around Denver
She was tall thin blonde, then a semi conscious perp


No wonder cops get shot at. Thugs in uniform.
 
Can't the police takedown move where they body slam people be replaced with "get on the ground or I will tazer you"?
Some woman got the takedown move somewhere around Denver
She was tall thin blonde, then a semi conscious perp


No wonder cops get shot at. Thugs in uniform.


Some of them definitely. Or are you still assuming that all cops are the same regardless of where they work?

Thasracis...
 
If they'd been less forceful, it would have given her the opportunity to run over and grab one of those chairs and bash the cops' heads in with it. This was a good call on the part of the police and they deserve commendations while the thug should be thrown in prison for attempted murder.
 
If they'd been less forceful, it would have given her the opportunity to run over and grab one of those chairs and bash the cops' heads in with it. This was a good call on the part of the police and they deserve commendations while the thug should be thrown in prison for attempted murder.

Izzat you, Loren?
 
Back
Top Bottom