Political Humor Image Discussion

[Rhea]

View attachment 16881

I'm confused about your voterID jokes. The Democrats are rightly concerned about people being illegally removed from voter rolls. They are concerned about hackers removing legal voters from the rolls.

Why would it be funny to claim Dems want voter ID laws?

 

[repoman]

If you need to have ID to vote for this...

 

[angelo]

View attachment 16881

I'm confused about your voterID jokes. The Democrats are rightly concerned about people being illegally removed from voter rolls. They are concerned about hackers removing legal voters from the rolls.

Why would it be funny to claim Dems want voter ID laws?

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

 

[Rhea]

View attachment 16881

I'm confused about your voterID jokes. The Democrats are rightly concerned about people being illegally removed from voter rolls. They are concerned about hackers removing legal voters from the rolls.

Why would it be funny to claim Dems want voter ID laws?

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

What makes you think you “know” that many illegal immigrants vote dem?

And why on earth do you think the Dems want to illegally remove the right of under educated people to vote?

 

[Patooka]

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

What the fuck do they put in the water in WA? It makes the stereotype of FNQ look tame in comparison.

 

[Underseer]

View attachment 16881

I'm confused about your voterID jokes. The Democrats are rightly concerned about people being illegally removed from voter rolls. They are concerned about hackers removing legal voters from the rolls.

Why would it be funny to claim Dems want voter ID laws?

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

Many illegal migrants vote?

Do tell. How many?

Cite your source.

As for the uneducated, whites without college degrees are the most reliable Republican voters. So that argument's a fail also.

 

[repoman]

Golly, this is obviously a trolling joke of an image which is why I posted it in that thread. Serves the purpose of trying to push people to want voter ID which is against the interest of Dems in the US and/or make fun of that type of election trolling that happened a lot in 2016.

 

[angelo]

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

Many illegal migrants vote?

Do tell. How many?

Cite your source.

As for the uneducated, whites without college degrees are the most reliable Republican voters. So that argument's a fail also.

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

 

[angelo]

http://www.people-press.org/2016/09/13/2-party-affiliation-among-voters-1992-2016/

 

[ZiprHead]

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

Many illegal migrants vote?

Do tell. How many?

Cite your source.

As for the uneducated, whites without college degrees are the most reliable Republican voters. So that argument's a fail also.

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

Other than in your propaganda induced fantasies, where is this happening?

 

[angelo]

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

Other than in your propaganda induced fantasies, where is this happening?

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

 

[ZiprHead]

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

Other than in your propaganda induced fantasies, where is this happening?

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

 

[angelo]

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

 

[ZiprHead]

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

That's easy. Because they are shown so readily to be liars and frauds while the Times is a well respect, truthful and fact-based source of journalism.

The real question you should ask yourself is, why do you believe these liars and fraudsters? Could it be your own entrenched bias?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

What makes you think you “know” that many illegal immigrants vote dem?

And why on earth do you think the Dems want to illegally remove the right of under educated people to vote?

Most don't vote at all.

However, if they did vote he's probably right--they are in a demographic that generally votes D.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Many illegal migrants and under educated people tend to vote Dem.

Many illegal migrants vote?

Do tell. How many?

Cite your source.

As for the uneducated, whites without college degrees are the most reliable Republican voters. So that argument's a fail also.

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

Yup, stops the in-person train:


but does nothing about the absentee ballot train:


That's why we are opposed to it--the benefit is almost zero, the cost (both financial and in voter suppression) is considerable. It's just the absentee ballots tend R so the GOP isn't interested in addressing the issue.

- - - Updated - - -

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

We call Vertias fraudsters because they have been exposed as fraudsters.

 

[bilby]

Why do you think Dems think it's a bad idea for voter ID if not because it's unfavorable for them? I'd think the same if the GOP were against it. Voter ID would stop voter fraud in it's tracks. It would eliminate voters been bused around an electorate to vote for certain candidates or a party.

It would also eliminate dead people voting!

Yup, stops the in-person train:
View attachment 16980

but does nothing about the absentee ballot train:
View attachment 16981

That's why we are opposed to it--the benefit is almost zero, the cost (both financial and in voter suppression) is considerable. It's just the absentee ballots tend R so the GOP isn't interested in addressing the issue.

- - - Updated - - -

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

We call Vertias fraudsters because they have been exposed as fraudsters.

It appears that reality has a liberal bias.

Fortunately, reality doesn't give a flying fuck about our politics, and remains real no matter how many right-wingnuts wail and gnash their teeth about their lies not being given the same status as facts.

 

[Patooka]

Not 100% proof, but controversial anyway. The saying where there's smoke there's fire may apply here.
https://www.news.com.au/finance/eco...s/news-story/43f961f945efb1922dd95a985bfb0650

I don't believe anything from Project Veritas. They are inveterate liars and fraudsters and tape editors. If it's smoke from them, you can bet money it's coming from out of their asses.

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how voter systems in the United States work, even without voter ID.

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

I don't think the was a general attack on any media without a left wing bias, the argument is the Project Veritas has consistently been proven to be completely full of shit. It's as reliable as Gateway Pundit or World Net Daily. None of which, for that matter, hold their own reporting to even a fraction of the scrutiny the NY times does for their stories.

 

[angelo]

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

That's easy. Because they are shown so readily to be liars and frauds while the Times is a well respect, truthful and fact-based source of journalism.

The real question you should ask yourself is, why do you believe these liars and fraudsters? Could it be your own entrenched bias?

Reporting the islamic roots of the London, Paris etc terrorist attacks are lies? I suppose they are lies to the blinkered leftists loonies.

 

[ZiprHead]

Why is it that any org that exposes the entrenched left bias, or criticism of islam are fraudsters and charlatans while something like The New York Times etc are given credibility?

That's easy. Because they are shown so readily to be liars and frauds while the Times is a well respect, truthful and fact-based source of journalism.

The real question you should ask yourself is, why do you believe these liars and fraudsters? Could it be your own entrenched bias?

Reporting the islamic roots of the London, Paris etc terrorist attacks are lies? I suppose they are lies to the blinkered leftists loonies.

Bullshit. That's not the subject of this discussion and you know it. -10 points for deflection.