Shadowy Man
Contributor
Jokes referring to the same person, yes?
Jokes referring to the same person, yes?
1. There are a lot fewer CEOs of port companies than there are dockworkers.Strange how Derek never complains about the greed of the CEO class whose income would make the income of the dock workers look like a pittance.
How dare people joke about the president of the United States!Jokes referring to the same person, yes?
Is that supposed to be a response to my question? Bizarre…How dare people joke about the president of the United States!Jokes referring to the same person, yes?
Don't people know that this is only "woke" when cracking jokes about Republican presidents?
Won't somebody please think of the children!
Biden administration Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su was an important administration liaison working with both the union and port ownership group to reach a deal at meetings held in New Jersey on Thursday, according to a source familiar with the talks.
“The collective bargaining process really worked,” said Su in an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Friday morning. “We’ve been saying it all along. When workers have a real voice at the table and when they can help to determine the conditions of their jobs, we’re seeing really historic gains for working people, and we’re also seeing it because we have such a strong economy. ... Companies that are making record profits are realizing that when they do right by their workers, it’s better not just for working people, it’s better for their industries, it’s better for their future.”
That was never going to happen. Biden/Harris/Walz is firmly on the side of Big Labor, even when they have completely unreasonable demands.The strike has been quietly resolved. It was a mistake for the USMX to try and play hardball without recruiting meaningful political support first.
Which is why Biden should have invoked Taft-Hartley.I meant in reality. But yes, they were probably doomed to lose this fight. The government has every reason to want the ports to be open,
Nobody is saying they should not get paid. But they are already very well paid. They want ridiculous amount more (70% pay increase) and no automation in ports, and are using extortion, monopoly power of their union, and an unreasonably friendly White House to get their way.and the workers have every right to demand payment for their work.
I was being polite - it is actually ignorant. The ILA has locals - does that mean it is not "big labor". There are simply two parties negotiating to set wages, benefits and working conditions. If the ILA is a monopoly then the UMEX is a monopsony.It's not nitpicking. Monopolistic power of big labor is an important factor in their ability to extort exorbitant pay and ban on automation.Nitpicking - there are two parties to the negotiations.
Why? It is not as if US ports compete for the business in the Europe or Asia.Yes, I did. So did TV&CC.You offered no relevant background.
When the issue is that the Union is making US ports be less efficient through lack of automation, comparison with other major ports in Europe and Asia is very much relevant.How ports operate in Europe have nothing to do with the port operations in the USA.
Wrong.As always, reading comprehension fail.Post #3 contains no relevant background as to the profitability or the issues and positions in negotiations.
But they are unbalanced negotiations because of the monopoly power of the Union.Yes, the port operators wish to introduce labor saving devices and methods. And the union is against that. Which is one of the reasons there are negotiations.
Ms. Harris doesn't have to be neutral - she is a politician. Your claim about President Biden was factually incorrect.It's just how Maya Rudolph's Kamala Harris pronounces his name. It's a joke.I have no idea who the fuck JaBiden is.
Kamala Harris' statements were anything but neutral on the matter.President Biden is letting the two parties try to work things out. at this point. Refusing to get in the middle is the opposite of support.
Harris hails striking dockworkers, swipes at Trump’s record
They are. Using monopolistic power against monopsonistic power is also a very different thing. As is eating ice cream or walking dogs are very different things. Did you have a point?Wanting more and using monopolistic power to extort more by shutting down ports are very different things.The horror, the absolute horror that someone wants MORE!!!! Really, what's is the world coming to? How the fuck dare anyone in the USA to want or expect more?
Good for them. For someone who appears to be a supporter of capitalism, you sure throw around leftist rhetoric like "exorbitant compensation".And they got 60% more money on top of already exorbitant compensation.Anyway, those greedy dockworkers have settled (at least until Jan. 15). So the US economy is safe for now from those ungrateful rapacious workers.
And US ports are still decades behind the rest of the world.
So one should only make reasonable demands, you would argue? You would be a terrible labor organizer. Or CEO, for that matter. Read the "Art of the Deal" sometime, you might learn something useful. Or the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition.Which is why Biden should have invoked Taft-Hartley.I meant in reality. But yes, they were probably doomed to lose this fight. The government has every reason to want the ports to be open,
Nobody is saying they should not get paid. But they are already very well paid. They want ridiculous amount more (70% pay increase) and no automation in ports, and are using extortion, monopoly power of their union, and an unreasonably friendly White House to get their way.and the workers have every right to demand payment for their work.
What does a Dock Worker do?
Dockworkers load and unload cargo and prepare docks for incoming ships. They moor and unmoor ships upon their arrival and departure and maintain accurate records of damaged or misplaced cargo. They follow loading and unloading plans and participate in all company training programs. They install gangways to receive incoming ships and ensure the ship’s spill containment boom is in proper working order. They safely load and unload cargo using suitable material handling equipment, including forklifts, hand trucks, pallet jacks, cranes, and grain trimmers.
Dockworkers inspect unloaded cargo for damages or irregularities and track the unloaded shipment by inputting information using spreadsheets and documents required by management. They communicate with colleagues to ensure the safe loading and unloading of cargo continues and ensure the dock areas are clean and free of debris to prevent accidents or injury. Dockworkers need a high-school diploma or equivalency including the GED and a valid forklift license as well as an ability to operate heavy machinery.
What responsibilities are common for Dock Worker jobs?
What are the typical qualifications for Dock Worker jobs?
- Oversee and be responsible for all paperwork associated with the dock to ensure it is handled timely and correctly by employees.
- Prepare receipts to help separate freight by SKU #.
- Determine work procedures, prepare work schedules, and expedite workflow.
- Provide training for dock personnel and close monitoring of safety procedures and policies.
- Help manage the inbound/outbound dock operation.
- Ensure that boaters observe all marina rules and regulations.
- Organize and maintain file systems, file correspondence and other records.
- Operate a forklift or order selector to transport parts in and about warehouse.
- Communicate and monitor workflow in support of manage loading/unloading of freight
- Associate's Degree or higher in computer science or engineering.
- Knowledgeable about loading procedures, including drop and hook routines.
- Able to work in hazardous and physically challenging conditions.
- Demonstrated strong time management, leadership, and problem solving skills.
- Proficient with Microsoft Office Suite.
First time I've heard collective bargaining referenced to as extortion.Which is why Biden should have invoked Taft-Hartley.I meant in reality. But yes, they were probably doomed to lose this fight. The government has every reason to want the ports to be open,
Nobody is saying they should not get paid. But they are already very well paid. They want ridiculous amount more (70% pay increase) and no automation in ports, and are using extortion, monopoly power of their union, and an unreasonably friendly White House to get their way.and the workers have every right to demand payment for their work.
And... ?1. There are a lot fewer CEOs of port companies than there are dockworkers.Strange how Derek never complains about the greed of the CEO class whose income would make the income of the dock workers look like a pittance.
The importance of those people to the nation's economy should be reflected in their pay. Don't you think?2. CEOs don't shut down the economy to extort higher pay.
Why not? The entire management team could go on vacation for a week and no one would notice. The dock workers strike for a couple days and all hell ensues. It's easy to identify who is more important and therefore more valuable to the nation's economy.3. CEOs do not fight to make their companies less efficient and technologically decades behind companies in the rest of the world.
That said, CEO compensation is often exorbitant too, but that has nothing to do with this thread. So why the whataboutism?
I note no attempt to rebut it.This is relevant to the stalled negotiations because..,,,1) Look at the article. The union is severely hampering automation and making US ports inefficient.Labor negotiations are just that - both sides make demands and concessions until there is an agreement. A strike is a last ditch effort by a union to get management to make more concessions. Without knowing the full context of the work environment, the profitability of the concern, and the actual back and forth of negotiations, I think picking a side in the dark is simply reflecting an ideological bias.
Ideological claptrap.Loren Pechtel said:2) Big unions always harm their employers. That's why there are few left--they've generally destroyed their employers. Only the ones where that can't realistically happen still exist.
Then fix your ears. It most certainly is extortion.First time I've heard collective bargaining referenced to as extortion.Which is why Biden should have invoked Taft-Hartley.I meant in reality. But yes, they were probably doomed to lose this fight. The government has every reason to want the ports to be open,
Nobody is saying they should not get paid. But they are already very well paid. They want ridiculous amount more (70% pay increase) and no automation in ports, and are using extortion, monopoly power of their union, and an unreasonably friendly White House to get their way.and the workers have every right to demand payment for their work.
Or the companies knew they weren't going to get any help and caving to the union was their best option. A cost which hits your competition equally to hitting you doesn't do much harm to your business, it just causes the price of the goods to go up. We are the ones that pay, not the companies.I'm old fashioned, but I go by a simple rule that if a strike opens and the business immediately throws out a pay increase 50%, maybe there is more to this than the workers are "greedy". Greed is often viewed as a one-way street.
I note no attempt to respond.This is relevant to the stalled negotiations because..,,,1) Look at the article. The union is severely hampering automation and making US ports inefficient.Labor negotiations are just that - both sides make demands and concessions until there is an agreement. A strike is a last ditch effort by a union to get management to make more concessions. Without knowing the full context of the work environment, the profitability of the concern, and the actual back and forth of negotiations, I think picking a side in the dark is simply reflecting an ideological bias.
I note you offered no evidence to support your opinion.I note no attempt to rebut it.Ideological claptrap.Loren Pechtel said:2) Big unions always harm their employers. That's why there are few left--they've generally destroyed their employers. Only the ones where that can't realistically happen still exist.
So?Unions basically exist only where there is minimal if any ability to have non-union competition.