Race faker Rachel Dolezal

[TSwizzle]

She is on some sort of book tour;

Now Dolezal is giving interviews to promote her new book, insisting she is a transracial woman in a white body, and stirring new kinds of outrage in the transgender community. In an interview with Salon last week, Dolezal compared herself to Caitlyn Jenner — an Olympic athlete turned transgender icon. “There was a time when we did call transgender, or even gay and bisexual, people crazy,” she said. “That still perpetuates, to a degree, but there’s more acceptance for gender fluidity than there is race fluidity right now.”

“Maybe we will evolve and grow and racial fluidity will become a thing in 20 years?” she said. “I don’t know.”

WaPO

I'm surprised that the thought police have not taken her side. I wonder if Rachel had been black and was faking she was white if things would have been viewed differently.

 

[J842P]

Wow. This reads almost like a satire.

 

[Angry Floof]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

 

[laughing dog]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

It is spring time, so expect more alt snowflakes to melt.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

She was fired by the NCAAP so that's hardly F*/;$%$ right wing followers. Some Loony Tune religious fanatic as you say caused the death of 2 children due to medical neglect. This does not seem to relate with Rachel.

There's a section in wiki about her.

 

[Angry Floof]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

She was fired by the NCAAP so that's hardly F*/;$%$ right wing followers. Some Loony Tune religious fanatic as you say caused the death of 2 children due to medical neglect. This does not seem to relate with Rachel.

There's a section in wiki about her.

I didn't call her a right wing authoritarian follower. I was referring to the people who gawk at these irrelevancies and post them here in full snowflake hysteria in some kind of pigeon chess idea that it means anything or proves anything in their hatred for everything liberal. She's an individual who has hurt no one and holds no influence over our country or its laws or its attitudes. She's an easy target for lazy, empathy-challenged, right wing authoritarian follower minds.

Meanfuckingwhile, organized confusions such as Christianity, scientology, and right wing political ideology fight for social dominance with real human beings suffering for it. Not that you would notice.

 

[dismal]

I, for one, can't accept this idea of "racial fluidity" until someone can square it with the C. Thomas Howell lesson from Soul Man, the famous documentary about a guy who pretends to be Black to get a scholarship to Harvard Law:

[YOUTUBE]cbKyDCuuLms/YOUTUBE]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbKyDCuuLms

 

[fromderinside]

I, for one, can't accept this idea of "racial fluidity" until someone can square it with the C. Thomas Howell lesson from Soul Man, the famous documentary about a guy who pretends to be Black to get a scholarship to Harvard Law:

[YOUTUBE]cbKyDCuuLms/YOUTUBE]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbKyDCuuLms

Let me pose this question to you then. Europeans and now Americans are accepting the idea of human sexual fluidity. If you agree with those majorities then why do you reject racial fluidity when it is evident there is no genetic evidence that race exists in humans.

 

[untermensche]

If good white folk can go and pretend they's a negra then negras can go and pretend they is one of us.

We can't be havin any of that.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

This is hilarious. I say let her consider herself black if she wants to be black. Why the outrage?

Is she demanding by penalty of law that we all call her black too? And what would that entail? At least there are no black racial pronouns she'll demand to be addressed as. Maybe she will want the perks of affirmative action for black people?

I say she can call herself whatever she wants and we can do the same. Same goes for the transgender people. And if you decide you are now a horse, that's cool too. Just don't expect us to all agree you are one.

 

[thebeave]

I hear she has some pretty serious financial problems these days, so maybe she's holding out for some possible slave reparations in the future.

Cha Ching!

 

[Derec]

I'm surprised that the thought police have not taken her side. I wonder if Rachel had been black and was faking she was white if things would have been viewed differently.

 

[thebeave]

I wonder if what we used to call "Blacks without Soul" is really just blacks feeling transracially white. Maybe we have a new protected class to add to our ever growing list?!

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZRePZ1OqQE[/YOUTUBE]

 

[Juma]

This "identity by skin color" discussion is ridiculous.
I identify with all with shoesize 37. I identify with all with small noses. Or big noses. Or footsize 42.

We are humans individuals. What group you identifies with is noones business.

 

[Angry Floof]

I wonder if what we used to call "Blacks without Soul" is really just blacks feeling transracially white. Maybe we have a new protected class to add to our ever growing list?!

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZRePZ1OqQE[/YOUTUBE]

Yep, a new class, solely for the purpose of triggering the insecurities of poor, set upon white men.

 

[Harry Bosch]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

I totally agree with your post. She decided to live her life a certain way. She wanted to emulate her children. She made a mistake. She's apologized to everyone. She's paid a terrible price. I'd just let her be. She's bankrupt. She's been shamed. What more do people want from her? Why is her crime such a big deal?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Who cares? You guys are the tabloids of TFT.

There's a couple who killed both of their children by medical neglect due to psychotic religious belief. There's something to dredge up to expose the inhumane nature of a currently popular belief system.

But no, you choose to gawk at irrelevancies. That woman may be nuts, but she's not hurting anyone. Thanks for yet again demonstrating that right wing faux outrage has nothing to do with principles or actual suffering of actual human beings, but rather a focused need to feel like you're correct in your inhumane beliefs and willingness to gawk at the possibly mentally ill to do it.

Fucking right wing authoritarian followers.

I totally agree with your post. She decided to live her life a certain way. She wanted to emulate her children. She made a mistake. She's apologized to everyone. She's paid a terrible price. I'd just let her be. She's bankrupt. She's been shamed. What more do people want from her? Why is her crime such a big deal?

Well, the SJW's here need something to be "outraged" over.

 

[thebeave]

I think the only people who have been "outraged" by Rachel Dolezal since the get go are some black people, particularly the ones in the NAACP where was in charge. The word you're looking for for everyone else's reaction is not "outrage" its, "laughing our asses off". Excepting of course, the far left diversity-obsessed nutters, where she is now a legend and a hero.

 

[whichphilosophy]

She was fired by the NCAAP so that's hardly F*/;$%$ right wing followers. Some Loony Tune religious fanatic as you say caused the death of 2 children due to medical neglect. This does not seem to relate with Rachel.

There's a section in wiki about her.

I didn't call her a right wing authoritarian follower. I was referring to the people who gawk at these irrelevancies and post them here in full snowflake hysteria in some kind of pigeon chess idea that it means anything or proves anything in their hatred for everything liberal. She's an individual who has hurt no one and holds no influence over our country or its laws or its attitudes. She's an easy target for lazy, empathy-challenged, right wing authoritarian follower minds.

Meanfuckingwhile, organized confusions such as Christianity, scientology, and right wing political ideology fight for social dominance with real human beings suffering for it. Not that you would notice.

My only point is she was fired by the NCAAP because you referred to the (extreme) right wing. I also think that it is unfortunate that she feels she had to pretend she is of colour to work with people of colour. I don't think targeting her would most likely backfire as she is an unemployed mother and not a celebrity flowing in cash.

 

[Angry Floof]

. I also think

I also think anyone harping on this woman or "analyzing" the story for any reason is a fucking idiot. Doing so only serves lazy brains and malformed beliefs about human beings. It's gratuitous hatred from unaware people and serves no purpose in any topic in this forum. There is nothing useful to say about this story except to call out such idiots.