So they all get together and rape each other (presumably on private property)?
To be clear, they don't advocate raping people.
They claim that making rape legal in private property would be the way to pretty much put an end to rapes in private property - and to nearly all rapes -, because potential victims would take sufficient precautions. Not that that makes any sense, but it's a different kind of nonsense.
Source:
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
I'm undecided on that.To be clear, they don't advocate raping people.
They claim that making rape legal in private property would be the way to pretty much put an end to rapes in private property - and to nearly all rapes -, because potential victims would take sufficient precautions. Not that that makes any sense, but it's a different kind of nonsense.
Source:
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
I think it's a satire piece. It's sure to get the feminazis into a rage, 10 out of 10.
They won't feel as such when the guy next to him is shoving himself up his butt. Because he is there on private property. Therefore... consent!So they all get together and rape each other (presumably on private property)?
To be clear, they don't advocate raping people.
Are you under the impression that rapists don't know that they shouldn't rape?HOW TO STOP RAPE
Teach potential rapists not to rape.
The end.
They won't feel as such when the guy next to him is shoving himself up his butt. Because he is there on private property. Therefore... consent!To be clear, they don't advocate raping people.
Or does this only apply to heterosexuals?
They won't feel as such when the guy next to him is shoving himself up his butt. Because he is there on private property. Therefore... consent!To be clear, they don't advocate raping people.
Or does this only apply to heterosexuals?
Are you under the impression that rapists don't know that they shouldn't rape?HOW TO STOP RAPE
Teach potential rapists not to rape.
The end.
Are you under the impression that rapists don't know that they shouldn't rape?
No.
But knowing you shouldn't do something is not the same as having been taught the discipline not to do it.
Surprisingly I know of zero adult/elderly males who engaged in this "rite of passage".Years ago, it was almost an American right of passage for young men to get in a car, drive to gay parts of various cities an "roll queers".
Was the wave a response to 'rolling queers'?Then there was teh wave a concealed carry bills passed in many states.
Reportedly.So there was formed an organization, the Pink Pistols. That was made up of gay men who bought guns and went to gun ranges, practiced their marksmanship and got concealed carry licenses. Reportedly, as soon as word spread, in many cities, rolling queers incidents dropped off markedly.
Thriving Rape Culture?Perhaps what is needed is a new organization for these times in which it seems rape cultue is thriving.
Actually it seems that all 'we' need to do is 'not' change the law to allow legal rape. I cannot more strongly disagree with the philosophy of making everything legal and handing out guns to all parties and see how it all plays out. This is America, not Thunderdome.Something "Armed Feminists of America". Boy would that idea make the surly SOBs scream.
I'm undecided on that.I think it's a satire piece. It's sure to get the feminazis into a rage, 10 out of 10.
It's very difficult sometimes to tell the difference between true absurd beliefs and satire.
What I’ve gathered from the words of these future Pulitzer Prize winners is that women are not getting raped by violent offenders while taking a jog in the park or walking through a dark street—they are getting raped by men they already know, especially at college. I learned that if a man and a woman both drink at a party and have sex, she was in all likelihood raped since she could not give full legal consent. This made me confused because a woman who drinks and has sex is not responsible for her actions, but if that same woman gets into a car and drives it into someone else, causing a loss of life, she would be prosecuted and sent to jail. I couldn’t find an explanation for this inconsistency.
By attempting to teach men not to rape, what we have actually done is teach women not to care about being raped, not to protect themselves from easily preventable acts, and not to take responsibility for their actions. At the same time, we don’t hesitate to blame men for bad things that happen to them (if right now you walked into a dangerous ghetto and got robbed, you would be called an idiot and no one would say “teach ghetto kids not to steal”). It was obvious to me that the advice of our esteemed establishment writers and critics wasn’t stopping the problem, and since rape was already on the law books with severe penalties, additional laws or flyers posted on dormitory doors won’t stop this rape culture either.
Which do you have more power over, yourself and circumstances you put yourself in or other people and their actions? What is the best way to allocate limited time and resources for education?Are you under the impression that rapists don't know that they shouldn't rape?
No.
But knowing you shouldn't do something is not the same as having been taught the discipline not to do it.
I don't believe you can't tell if it's satire. It is so obviously satire.I'm undecided on that.I think it's a satire piece. It's sure to get the feminazis into a rage, 10 out of 10.
It's very difficult sometimes to tell the difference between true absurd beliefs and satire.
FFS it so obviously satire that I don't believe anyone with half a brain could miss that.Supporters of a website led by a man who says rape should be legalised on private property are set to meet up in cities around Australia, sparking a backlash on social media.
You're wrong about me, and I don't know whether you're right about the piece.I don't believe you can't tell if it's satire. It is so obviously satire.I'm undecided on that.
It's very difficult sometimes to tell the difference between true absurd beliefs and satire.