I don't see him providing any evidence. As for me, I remember starting a thread about how one of the member of the opposition was dropping (privately) the Clinton's name. It's way more evidence than Mueller have on Trump&Co
I know, you honestly believe your shit. Does not make it reality though.
Well, you are right that the official vote count was not narrow, but there were two major problems with that argument. The first was that most of his competitors were simply kept off the ballot on technicalities over qualifying petitions, so that voters did not really have any genuine alternative. The second was that about a third of the voting precincts reported irregularities, particularly so-called
carousel voting (карусели), a very popular vote-rigging method in Russia. (Carousel voting was also used to help get Yanukovych elected in Ukraine.) Putin is likely correct that he would have won anyway, since that was a foregone conclusion brought about by eliminating viable ballot competitors. It is no wonder that the Communist Party (his only remaining serious competitor) refused to accept the results of the election, and tens of thousands gathered in a protest rally on the Arbat several days after his election victory.
I think Carousel voting is an invented excuse of the losers (West). Arbat is not not whole country. It's a known fact that Moscow is against Putin.Well, you are right that the official vote count was not narrow, but there were two major problems with that argument. The first was that most of his competitors were simply kept off the ballot on technicalities over qualifying petitions, so that voters did not really have any genuine alternative. The second was that about a third of the voting precincts reported irregularities, particularly so-called
You and your suppositions against my facts. Yes, Putin hates Clinton for her baseless criticism and support of opposition.
It started long before that. Russia warned US against meddling in Ukraine/Georgia in spring of 2008, before Georgian war.
How is that consistent with Obama's famous "russian economy in tatters" speech?
Yes, It's a standard and meaningless propaganda.
I understand in Russia you can still pay opposition but the government demands disclosure, same as in US. The mere fact of of being labeled as recipients of western money puts you at serious electoral disadvantage.
Can you verify these reports are 100% or even 10% accurate? In some cases people on the buses were workers from plants with working schedules which makes voting difficult. And even if these reports are true, scale of the fraud is limited, my understanding is that local authorities (not Putin directly) are behind all that. And again amount of fraud is most likely limited. Popularity of different parties and Putin himself is measured by a number of independent polling agencies and is consistent with election results. So fraud is limited.
The general consensus is that Mueller had them leaked. These haven't been given to the Trump Admin yet.
What I see being said is that these aren't actually Mueller's questions. They're not in 'lawyerese,' for one thing.
Sekulow is the TV face lawyer, he is still there. Sekulow is big in the fight against tyranny against the poor Christian majority in America. If there is a tree on Public Right-Of-Way that is being denied Xmas lights, he'll be there. That the Christian Right has adopted Trump is one of the more bizarre and morally bankrupt things done in the past several decades.
