Underseer
Contributor
I started reading the gulag archipelago at Jordan Peterson's recommendation because it perhaps gives one some insight into how he views things.("You need to read it if you want to understand what's happening." Roughly his words) I'm not even 100 pages in and I'm already sick with exhaustion. That said I have noted some interesting points:
-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn attributes a large amount of the arrests in the soviet republics to the system of government quotas for arrests. It's actually one of the first things he points out.
-The USSR immediately began the business of destroying their political opposition in the aftermath of the revolution. There wasn't much of a "Step by step..." things definitely got worse as time went on but it parallels Hitler perfectly in that they didn't wait for their opposition to consolidate power and do much organizing.
-The USSR made a point to destroy its prisoners slowly and as secretively as possible, such that the entire scope of their crimes could never be brought to light, contrasting with the holocaust which Eisenhower meticulously documented but could only do so as a result of prevailing in armed conflict with the third reich.
-Part of the way the USSR maintained control was to pit the cities against the country and visa versa and to feed their outrage against so-called parasites. In this regard they're not much different from modern conservatives!
-Another way was by creating an atmosphere of paranoia. "Who can we trust? Who's an informant?" It speaks to the efficacy of the USSR's ability to paralyze the creation of new political opposition (Though small movements seem to have persisted regardless)
-The soviet union did not care for socialists because they threatened the power of the totalitarian state and made efforts to hunt them down, also not much different from hitler funnily enough.
I'll maybe go further in depth if/when I finish the book but I am finding it a good read so far.
If America ever tries socialism, there will be no Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
Not sure if full on socialism is a good idea, but as things get tighter and tighter for the average working joe in this country, I'm starting to wonder if America just can't handle capitalism without fucking everyone over. Believe me, there are days when the bread lines sound good.
The problem with the Soviet system wasn't economics. We can argue that was a failure (bread lines), but it was the political structure that was a complete failure, and their political structure was a Dictatorship of the Proletariat, which should have been obvious bullshit to anyone who read Marx even before the Soviet Union existed.
Marx was really good at identifying the problem, but equally terrible at suggesting solutions.