Elixir
Made in America
Wikipedia does have bias problems but it's with what they choose to include, not with the facts presented.
Really? From what I've seen and heard from them, they constantly reach out for more inclusions. It would kinda defeat the purpose if they were to do the opposite.
But the salient point bearing on RVonse's inability to find any confidence in anything, is that Wikipedia's material is extensively footnoted, sources are identified and often linked, and points of possible contention are often notated with requests for more information. I find Wiki extremely valuable in making quick determinations as to whether a question is worth pursuing. As far as factual matters, it's only good for simple facts of the variety that SIRI or ALEXA could answer.
Or in other words, Wikipedia makes a great hub for referential cross-linking.
It can be a lot more; as an investigative tool it can lead to obscure but relevant documents that would otherwise be hard to find. Even as an entertainment portal, it’s an impressive edifice.