You've got a prime example of how a cultist thinks. Look in a mirror.
-
Features
The effects of warming: Kilodeaths
- Thread starter Loren Pechtel
- Start date
You've got a prime example of how a cultist thinks. Look in a mirror.
angelo
Deleted
If further proof was needed that Michael Mann et all was a climate shyster.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_defendants_costs.html#.XZTLPeY2j20.facebook
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_defendants_costs.html#.XZTLPeY2j20.facebook
DBT
Contributor
It's the overall evidence that counts....not Joe Brown says this or Jack Smith says that.
As far as I can tell, this is what happened:
1. Ball called Mann a fraud.
2. Mann sued Ball for libel.
3. Judge dismissed case due to delays.
The court did not agree with Ball's claim that Mann is a fraud, and has nothing to say on the science.
angelo
Deleted
Another supreme court judge in the UK ordered prophet Al Gore to delete bullshit claims in his mocumentary An Inconvenient Truth.
Around in the same decade, there was the embarrassing Climategate episode. But just like any other cult, it didn't matter to the alarmists and climate scammers! It was just like water off a ducks back!
Around in the same decade, there was the embarrassing Climategate episode. But just like any other cult, it didn't matter to the alarmists and climate scammers! It was just like water off a ducks back!
Jokodo
Veteran Member
Would that be the judge who called the film overall accurate and well researched and recommended it for screening in schools but also said it should be presented along with accompanying materials discussing some of the small points where it's not entirely accurate? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/2007/oct/11/climatechange
There is fraud alright, but the fraudsters ate the ones twisting out of context sentences into meaning something they never meant, and you fell for them.
We are still where we were--he lost on the grounds that the allegations were so nutty that they wouldn't be taken seriously. The judge erred, it's obvious a lot of people did take it seriously.
angelo
Deleted
Ah so! The judge erred? Of course this judge would probably be a Nobel Prize nominee had he found against Prof Tim Ball and Mark Steyn.
You're still not getting it. The defense was that the claims were ludicrous. You're treating the "win" as if they were correct.
angelo
Deleted
Shyster Michael Mann could not prove his Hockey Stitch was not tampered with, therefore a fraud!
Jokodo
Veteran Member
You aren't reading what Loren says: The court case wasn't about Mann's data, it was about whether Ball's lie was damaging enough not to be protected as free speech.
Reads like a Trump tweet.
Trump's tweets are full of ridiculous claims and name-calling because he is an ill-tempered buffoon who continually finds himself at odds with the facts, and his instinctive response is to lash out.
Something for you to reflect on, like a layer of greenhouse gases or a high albedo ice sheet.
angelo
Deleted
Ball's Lie? Are you sure about that? Doesn't that make the Supreme court a lame duck?
angelo
Deleted
Do you mean those " ice sheets" that were supposed to have melted 2 decades ago?
Jokodo
Veteran Member
No, it just means there are strict rules for when knowingly stating a falsehood becomes punishable - in most cases, unless substantial damage can be demonstrated, free speech takes precedence. You should know this, you'd go to jail for the rest if your days if this weren't so.
Just more bullshit from a self-confessed "dumb arse".
Tell us again how the greenhouse effect isn't real. That's my favourite so far.
angelo
Deleted
FMD................it's bullshit that the ice sheets were predicted to have long ago melted and are still there? And in as many cases actually grew is bullshit! One can't make this stuff up, it can only come from the blind faith based cult of GW/CC/CD.
Earth has had an atmosphere for billions of years, and " greenhouse effect" is part of what makes life possible on this planet. Were there no greenhouse, there would be no plant or animal life. CO2 makes up less than 3% of this atmosphere. I've posted a list of elements that make up Earth's atmosphere before. By far the biggest contributor to Earth's climate is water vapor, not CO2 which is a plant food!
Earth has had an atmosphere for billions of years, and " greenhouse effect" is part of what makes life possible on this planet. Were there no greenhouse, there would be no plant or animal life. CO2 makes up less than 3% of this atmosphere. I've posted a list of elements that make up Earth's atmosphere before. By far the biggest contributor to Earth's climate is water vapor, not CO2 which is a plant food!
lpetrich
Contributor
angelo, I suggest visiting planet Venus some time. It has plenty of CO2 in its atmosphere, CO2 that gives it a super greenhouse effect.
angelo
Deleted
I had to read that statement twice. Are you finally admitting the sun has influence on a planet's climate? Do pray tell, How did Venus acquire so much CO2 when there are no humans there burning fossil fuels?
lpetrich
Contributor
Trump axed a rule that would help protect coastal properties like Mar-a-Lago from flooding - Vox - his beloved estate would be drowned by a sea-level rise of 3 m / 10 ft.
Sea level review Science 2010.pdf - Sea-Level Rise and its Impact on Coastal Zones
2019 Global Temperatures Through June: Among Top 5 Hottest on Record | Climate Central
Mann et al 2008, Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia
The Medieval Warm Period was about as warm as it is was back in 1950, and the Earth declined in temperature since then, reaching a low point in the 19th cy., Then the temperature started going up very fast.
Paleoclimatic Data for the Last 2,000 Years | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) formerly known as National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) - around 1 CE, it was as warm as 1900, then in 1000 CE, as warm as 1950, then a decline that bottomed out around 1700 and then stayed flat - the "Little Ice Age". I'm eyeballing the graphs, so there is a bit of discrepancy between my description of this one and the previous one.
The Medieval Warm Period had lots of strong Atlantic hurricanes and droughts in the US West, and these hurricanes and droughts seem to be returning.
Sea level review Science 2010.pdf - Sea-Level Rise and its Impact on Coastal Zones
2019 Global Temperatures Through June: Among Top 5 Hottest on Record | Climate Central
Mann et al 2008, Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia
The Medieval Warm Period was about as warm as it is was back in 1950, and the Earth declined in temperature since then, reaching a low point in the 19th cy., Then the temperature started going up very fast.
Paleoclimatic Data for the Last 2,000 Years | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) formerly known as National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) - around 1 CE, it was as warm as 1900, then in 1000 CE, as warm as 1950, then a decline that bottomed out around 1700 and then stayed flat - the "Little Ice Age". I'm eyeballing the graphs, so there is a bit of discrepancy between my description of this one and the previous one.
The Medieval Warm Period had lots of strong Atlantic hurricanes and droughts in the US West, and these hurricanes and droughts seem to be returning.